March 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Day March 2, 2011

Uganda Political Parties Should have an official ‘Tranfer Window’ as it is in Football


Abbey Semuwemba

Now that the Uganda presidential elections are over, I suggest that we probably create a ‘Transfer Window’ which is almost similar to that in football in January and June/July every year, due to increased bribery among politicians and crossing of voters. With a ‘trasfer window’ closed, political ‘players’ will not be allowed to move to another party till when the next ‘window’ opens.Seriously,this is something the 9th parliament should think about to avoid the problems we have witnessed in the current elections. Fraudulent elections are the signature of governments run by bribery, partisan state institutions, and dominated by secrecy, zealots, party fanatics and corporate thugs. If fraud is the decider of a national election, it is far more serious, and chances are that the one who does it most usually wins the elections in Africa.

Transfer of players in both football and politics is simply a money grab. Everything else its proponents say is just window-dressing. It mainly involves the transfer of wealth from the superrich to underclass. For instance, the Fernando Torres joined Chelsea at £50m in this year’s January Transfer window because he was given a better contract than he had at Liverpool. He also claimed that he wanted to win trophies, and he is probably right though this made him look like a ‘Judas Iscariot’ to Liverpool fans. Similarly, some Ugandans have recently moved from other parties without an official ‘transfer window’ to join mainly NRM and FDC. Historically,when UPC was formed in the 1960s, it took a big chunk of DP and Kabaka Yekka(KY) members. In 1980 UPC also lost a big chunk of its members to DP. Some of these included: Dr. Martin Aliker, Professor Yoweri Kyesimira, Dr.Kazungu, Dr.Muzira, Wilson Lutaya, Matia Ngobi, James Kahigiriza,Nekyon, Alex Waibale, and many others who had abandoned the sinking ship with driven by late Captain Dr.Obote.

Fernando Torres

Wayne Rooney wanted to leave Manchester United last year because of United’s lack of clout in attracting more top players to the club, but he later turned around and signed a new contract with them. Similarly, FDC’s Mubarak Kirunda, the chairman LC3 Jinja Central Division, FDC vice chairman for Busoga region, was also reportedly planning to cross to NRM after a shs.1b bribe from Salim Saleh, but he later assured the party that he could not leave because of Shs1 billion. FDC’s Atugonza also reportedly resisted the bribe of shs.1.5b to join NRM. Atugonza behaved like Liverpool’s Stephen Gerald who resisted joining Chelsea FC for £30m some years back despite the astronomical wages he had been promised at Chelsea. The Kampala mayoral elections have been reportedly suspended due to ballot stuffing in favour of NRM’s Peter Ssematimba.Ballot stuffing was also reported during the presidential and parliamentary elections though the elections were generally peaceful compared to 2001 and 2006 elections.

In this election, we have watched some of the veteran politicians in UPC crossing to NRM. For example, I would never have imagined that men like Henry Mayiga, Chris Rwakasisi and Badru Wegulo would be campaigning for Museveni in these elections, but it happened. We also noted large numbers of supporters crossing between FDC and NRM from other political parties because the duos are now looked at as the political giants in Uganda. They are more like Chelsea,Manchestry City and Manchester United in the Premiership.I have intentionally not included Arsenal FC despite their success on the pitch, because they normally don’t spend big money on world-class players. Arsenal are usually a ‘buy 1, get 1 free’ team.Nevertheless, I think most of the crossover vote to NRM is people sick of a fragmented opposition where DP looks at IPC or FDC as enemies rather than people working towards the same goal.It can also be because voters look at FDC and NRM as more successful than other parties as in USA where the Indians have recently found that joining a tribe owning a successful casino is one of the pathways out of poverty.

I note that the voting among the crossovers has favored NRM and president Museveni in the elections more than anybody else. It seems to me that voters in the Uganda act very differently to voters here in the UK where I currently live.Over here someone may vote Labour in the local elections, Conservative in the general elections and Liberal Democrat in the European elections, for example. People swap and change all the time from one party to another depending on who has the best policies for the job at hand. In USA, Crossover voting has always been common in primary elections though a significant number of voters do crossover in the presidential elections. In Canada there are no bullshit elections. You mark an x in the circle you like it goes in a box and the totals are there and the box can be opened if there is any dispute. The cost is pencil and paper.

What a party like FDC needs now as the ‘transfer window’ remains open indefinitely or unofficially is more diversity so that it stops being perceived as a bunch of mostly westerners. They need to target brilliant young minds in all regions in the country as they have been slowly trying to do since 2004. Instead of having some old lame duck for the next 5 years, a rising star in the party should get a running start in any of the top party positions. For example, one of the reasons why Chelsea FC may not win the league this season is because they have got a lot of old players in their first team. Young people should be recruited for the right reasons and not just to use them to fight unnecessary political battles as NRM is doing. NRM are predators, who lie to young people and manipulate their economic situation in order to drag them away from the things they have grown up knowing, such as their belief in Kabakaship or other traditions.

However, with the current wave of people power or empowerment that started in Tunisia and Egypt, and now in Libya,Yemen and Bahrain, the NRM belief that they were going to be in power till when Jesus comes back is thankfully coming to an end. Everybody all over the world has started to realize that oppressing the masses is not an indefinite sustainable formula to staying in power. These protests are from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a person stands up for an idea, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, s/he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope among the population. It started with those men who fought for African independence and it is continuing with men who are now standing against the current African dictators.

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba
United Kingdom

When people are sufficiently angry and brave, change can’t be stopped


There is overwhelming evidence that sufficient frustration and anger alone are unlikely to bring about major changes. Frustration and anger must be combined with bravery for change to occur. England’s 1381 peasant revolt, France’s 1789 peasants and Parisian mobs, Tunisian and Egyptian youth uprisings were successful because frustration and anger were combined with bravery.

When vans and fire trucks ran over some demonstrators and men on horses charged into other peaceful demonstrators there were fatalities and injuries. But the Egyptians who survived did not run away. Instead they gathered courage, picked up stones and fought back. Their bravery encouraged other compatriots to join them while others at home and abroad cheered them to continue until their goal was realized. Hosni Mubarak saw the writing on the wall when demonstrated defied security forces and peacefully camped outside the presidential palace. He stepped down, packed his bags and left the presidential palace.

When Tutsi youth assaulted a Hutu local administrative chief in 1959, the Hutu population concluded that they had had enough. Spontaneously, they gathered courage and decided to defend themselves against well armed Batutsi. And the result was the social revolution that chased away Tutsi, abolished the monarchy and achieved independence in 1962. Hutus had all along been considered passive and docile who would never have the courage to even chase away a ‘fly’! They are now down, not out.

Starting in the 1940s, educated Bairu of southwest Uganda began to get good jobs, good incomes and to begin to live normal lives. In the 1950s they entered politics as Uganda prepared for independence and did well because of their numerical superiority over Bahororo and Bahima. The social programs launched by Obote in the 1960s pushed Bairu closer to the standard of living enjoyed by Bahororo and Bahima who had controlled the politics of the area and benefited economically.

Museveni and his friends gathered together in 1965 and began to prepare for war against Obote who had helped Bairu to make such fast progress. The idea was that once Obote was removed Bairu would revert to poverty and marginalization as they had lived since pre-colonial times. So, Museveni’s war was primarily aimed at Bairu. He succeeded because frustration and anger at Obote were combined with bravery to wage a guerrilla war. In March 1992 Bahororo from Ntungamo and Rukungiri districts met in Museveni’s house at Rwakitura to plot how to keep Bairu down permanently, among other things. The point being made here is that Museveni succeeded because he combined anger with bravery.

On the advice of the World Bank and IMF, the government of Bolivia privatized water promising consumers that services and prices would be better than before. What they ended up with were un-payable water bills and water was cut off. Frustration and anger combined with bravery Bolivian consumers organized for action. An unprecedented alliance among factory workers, farmers using water for irrigation, coca growers and marginalized urban population of Villa Pagado launched protests in the streets of Cochabamba against the terms of the social and economic relationship between people and water contract with Aguas del Tunari.

The protestors blocked roads. The army stepped in and some people were killed, serving only to increase resistance. The water battles led to intensification of other grievances. In October 2003, a popular revolt led by Indians brought down the government of Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada. Two years later Evo Morales, leader of the coca growers union, won presidential elections. It was deep-seated and long-held grievances combined with bravery that removed a government from power.

Museveni has angered Ugandans more than enough. He has deprived them of much of their natural rights such as education, food, jobs, health care and most recently the right to choose their own leaders. This was the worst election fraud in Uganda’s history and Ugandans are bitter. All the ingredients for a revolt and removal of Museveni from power are in place except one. Are Ugandans brave enough to mount peaceful demonstrations consistently until Museveni steps down? The world is watching. If we don’t act, Museveni will be proved right – Ugandans are indeed cowards.

There is good news! Museveni has been warned by major western powers that he cannot use force against peaceful demonstrators. That is why there was no bloodshed during the elections that have just ended because Museveni was warned not to use force. So Ugandans should not use the pretext of being killed by Museveni forces to avoid peaceful demonstrations. Failure to do so will be for other reasons including cowardice.

Museveni and his chiefs of police and army have also been reminded that if they do not control their staff and hurt citizen of Uganda during peaceful demonstrations the bosses will be individually responsible and liable for punishment by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Any soldier or police that commits a crime will also be individually responsible and liable for punishment. Pleading that you were ordered to kill or injure a fellow Ugandan will not get you off the hook! We urge all Uganda security forces to read the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to understand their responsibility and accountability.

We appeal to Ugandans to take pictures and get names of any officer anywhere in the country that violates the rights of Ugandans as well as the picture, name and location of the person assaulted. Send all that information to us. We shall use it to bring charges against the officers involved at an appropriate time. We must put an end to police and military brutality in Uganda. Security forces are hired and paid for by Uganda tax payers to protect and not kill Uganda citizens or anyone else.

Eric Kashambuzi
Working with United Nations in NewYork

The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Ugandan At Heart(UAH).” To also have your views published, please submit them to: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,588 other followers

%d bloggers like this: