BACKGROUND CHECKS IN UGANDA: We aren’t like Britain where there is 1 CCTV for every 13 members of the population, the highest CCTV density in the world


1/11 This question of background checks is related to many other questions that we have debated here on UAH, including that of the tribulations of Uganda Police, the ubiquity of violence in Ugandan society, and broader questions related to our general capabilities across the board. Even when you look closely at the debate on political participation, the autocratic propensties of leadership/political elites at every level of society (not just in the state, a point we often refuse to acknowledge), the question of the capabilities of a pre-industrial, mediaeval society always catch up with us.

2/11 Now, background checks: what are these? What do they entail? Me, myself, Corporal Otto: I was born in a banana plantation at the back of our kitchen. My illiterate grandmother was the midwife. My dining table, the placenta, for the 9 month intrauterine phase of my life was eaten by our dog, Popi. There are no records anywhere in Uganda that I was ever born. In places where they carry out background checks, things start from there: you are born in a hospital, your DNA is harvested, your blood group is established, bottom line, you get onto some database. You are registered with a general practitioner in places where there is a national health system, and every ailment you get is placed somehwere on a database.

3/11 You will go to school and this is compulsory, lest your parents end up in jail, and that means you will end up on the national educational system database. You will be mistreated by your booze-loving Mzee and end up on the vulnerable children’s database. Your parents will be entitled to child benefits, that will place you on the revenue services database. Your parents may get you a passport, and you will end up on the Home Affairs database. Every trip you make abroad will be logged somewhere, right from your infancy. And they will automatically have your finger prints.

4/11 As soon as you clock 16 years, you will see a card coming through the post, telling you that you have a social security number (SSN) or national insurance (NI) number depending on the country. Because all your correspondence comes to you by post, it means that your physical address is known, by post code or zipcode. You don’t live at “ekikkilira, kumpi nekiyinja, noyita kumuyembe, kumpi nakavule”. No! If you are Otto, yours will be, 117 Coffin Grove; Death side, Warwickshire; CV40 10QT; United Kingdom. In other words, you are on some one’s radar.

5/11 As you advance in your education, you will be entitled to a student’s loan. You will open a bank account where monthly instalments of the loan will be deposited. Every time, and whereever you draw cash, and where ever you do shopping, that is logged somewhere on a database. You will take bus/train rides using a students swipe card. Where ever you swipe it, someone knows already which city or town you are visiting. You will own a mobile phone, and not pay-as-you-go, but contractual. Whenever and where ever you make or receive a call, that is logged somewhere by GPS.

6/11 You will have a login to use the computers in your local library or your campus. When ever you use those computers, that is logged somewhere. You will have an email address. What ever you do with that address and whenever you log in, that is captured somewhere. Some camera will even have already recorded some of your biomentrics like the character of your iris…without your knowledge.

7/11 If you live in a country like Britain, which has 1 CCTV for every 13 members of the population, the highest CCTV density in the world, everywhere you walk, you are advised to smile, because you are on camera, being recorded somewhere. If you acquire a driving permit, you are already on the database of the agency that licences drivers and vehicle owners, by address etc.

8/11 In other words, where ever you are, you are leaving a massive electronic footprint, and that is the real content of your “back ground” in that “back ground check” that you are wondering about in the Ugandan context. In countries where individuals have such a huge electronic footprint, by the time police come to you to arrest you, you know they have their data: you just ask with a smile, for the handcuffs to be put on your wrists, because in your heart, you know they have the data: wamenikamata, bankutte, bangemye!

9/11 The other day we were talking about safe houses and torture and so on. Where people undergo subtle surveillance like I have tried to describe above, there is not torture. It is not because of democracy, as some of us argue here simplistically, it is because you do not have to whip some one to get information from him. You have it by just one push of the button. In Uganda, you lack that background information, whether on criminals, prospective judges ( I heard of a Senior Justice Kalanda who was found to have used some one else’s papers to advance his education), MPs, presidents, let alone military recruits.

10/11 So, let us get real and understand what makes things work or fail to work, instead of spending all our time ridiculing ourselves, wishing that we were like others, and generally cursing the dark without ever lighting any candle.

11/11 The lack of such infrastructure as I describe above accounts for such proverbs as “Ente endhirugavu enakuleta”, in other words, I can’t catch you now but when darkness sets in, you will come back to roost……I think that is Lusoga, your language. In other settings, whether it is shining or not, they will get you. Why?

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Otto Patrick

Bahima were/are part and parcel of Buganda history as they have given Buganda Kabakas and chiefs


Mr & Mrs Ham & Hannah Mukasa. Robert & Dorothy Sebuliba. 1901. At Mengo outside his father's House near the post office in mengo

Mr & Mrs Ham & Hannah Mukasa. Robert & Dorothy Sebuliba. 1901. At Mengo outside his father’s House near the post office in mengo

The Ham Mukasa's and the Mulyanti's family. The photo well could be in de 1930's or even before,co'z u see de kabaka Mutesa en to de left is Mr.Ham Mukasa Sekibobo.This picture was taken in Mengo- Kewerimidde house in the back yard. I am almost sure about that

The Ham Mukasa’s and the Mulyanti’s family. The photo well could be in de 1930′s or even before,co’z u see de kabaka Mutesa en to de left is Mr.Ham Mukasa Sekibobo.This picture was taken in Mengo- Kewerimidde house in the back yard. I am almost sure about that

Folks,
Bahima particularly Maama Nyakazaana, have given Buganda Kabakas and Chiefs. The prominent Nyakazaana is of the Bahinda clan of the Royal family of Nkore (“Ankole”).

Nyakazaana was the wife of Zachary Kiwanuka Sensalire, and together, they were the parents of Ham Mukasa Rwamujonjoza (1871-1956), one of the greatest sons of Buganda. Ham Mukasa as you know was the Sekibobo of Buganda (i.e., the Chief of Kyaggwe), the longest serving chief in the history of Buganda. Zakariya Kiwanuka Sensalire was himself a descendant of a long line of Sensalires, i.e. heads of the balalo clan of Njovu who are known to have gained prominence right from the days of Kabaka Kintu as the official balaalo. Up to now, it remains the duty of the Njovu clan to educate every new Kabaka on the art of bulaalo (herding). Like other balaalo, Sensalire married from among his fellow Bahima, hence the Nyakazaana that you are now vilifying.

Nyakazaana, a Muhima, was the mother of Ham Mukasa as we have seen. Ham Mukasa, with his first wife Anna Mawemuko, then went ahead to father Victoria Sarah Nalwanga (b. 1910). Nalwanga was the mother of the two Kisosonkoles, Sarah and Damali, the wives of Kabaka Edward Mutesa II.

Sarah Kisosonkole, (the great grand daughter of Nyakazana), was Kabaka Mutebi’s mother. The Kiganda version of the Hima name, Nakazana has stuck around up to now. Kabaka Mutebi’s first Namasole was known as Edith Nakazana. She passed away recently in London, I think on 02 Sep 2008, and you may have even attended her funeral service!

Tracing the ancestry of Nyakazaana was not an end in itself but a means of shedding light on the basic facts that we disregard when we are stoking antipathy against certain groups. Key here is the extent to which groups have intermingled over time, and in case of Buganda, the extent to which it is indeed a bundle of bundles, one of which bundles are Bahima. One could almost argue that Buganda is a bundle of Bahima and balaalo.

Look at this: the mother of Kabaka Mutebi I, Wanyana, was the daughter of Mugalula Buyonga, the founder of the Nseenene (conjugated from Nswa enene) clan. Mugalula, originally called Mugarra, a Muhima from Busongora and a mulaalo, moved with others from Busongora, with their herds of cattle and settled in Bweera via Buddu, then eventually moving to Nakanoni village in Gomba and on to Kisozi.

One of Mugalula’s brothers, Kalyebala (whose Kiganda’s corruption is “Kalibbala) became the chief mulaalo of Chwa I, Kabaka Kintu’s successor, was to be promoted to the chieftainship of Kayima or Kaima (in Runyakitara, part of which Rusongora is, Kahuma or Kahima, the cattle keeper or mulaalo). The Kayima or Kaima is still the title of the Chief of the Ssaza of Mawokoto (just like we have the Mugema of Busiro, the Kasujju of Busujju, the Katambala of Butambala; the Pokino of Buddu, the Sekibobo of Kyaggwe etc). All those were Bahima. I am sure you know that, those of Nsenene clan that lost their herds of cattle to rinderpest in the 1880s and resorted to crop rearing are now called Baima abatasunda, that is, the “Bahima that no longer churn milk”.

Mutesa I’s mother, Ndwaddewazziba, was a Muhima; Prince Badru Kakungulu’s mother was a Muhima, Prince John Kintu Wassajja’s mother was a Muhima, Princess Teyeggala’s mother was a Muhima, and as we have shown you here at UAH, Prince Jjunju Suna Kiwewa’s mother is a Mututsi, the Muhima equivalent of Rwanda-Burundi. The whole process of the arrival on the scene of your likely next Kabaka has been a process of concentrating Hima/Tutsi blood at Mmengo. You do not have to hate or love the fact. That is how it is.

If you can, look up the history of the Nsenene clan of Buganda, and ask them why the title of the Ssaza Chief of Mawokota (one of the three core counties of Buganda) is “Kaima” up to now. Ask them about the first Kaima that was to be aloocated a large estate in North Mawokota, the only known grazing grounds in the Mawokota-Kyaddondo-Busiro heartland of the nascent Buganda. Kaima means Kahima or Kahuma, “the Hamite”.

As you try to “dig dip” the history of Bahima and balaalo in Buganda, I will refer you to some readings that might give you some basic facts. These might also be of some use for others that champion Buganda exclusionism and the anti-Hima and anti-Tutsi invective that abounds on this forum:

1.Reid, Richard J (2002), Political Power in Precolonial Buganda (Kampala: Fountain)…also available from James Currey and Ohio University Press.
2.Kaggwa, Apollo Sir (1934), The customs of Buganda (New York: New York)
3.Ashe, RP (1889), Two Kings of Buganda (London).
4.Roscoe, J (1911), The Baganda: An Account of their Naive Customs and Beliefs (London).

And on some people’s conviction that Baganda are pygymoid, I refer you to:

Mukasa, Ham (1904), Uganda ‘s Katikiro in England ; being the official account of his visit to the coronation of His Majesty King Edward VII ( London : Hutchinson ).

In Sir HH Johnston’s introduction to that book on page xvii, we read that, Apolo Kaggwa is “…a very tall and muscular man about 6ft 3in and of absolutely unmixed Negro race.”

And on the view that my reference to Bahima being part and parcel of Buganda history is contraband, on that same page of that book I quote above we read that Ham Mukasa is

“…somewhat lighter in colour and has about him a slight element of the aristocratic caste in Uganda (read Buganda) known as the Bayima or Bahima”

That corroborates the information you discounted as “smuggling” Bahima and Balaalo into Buganda history. And of course, you did not justify your use of the term “smuggling”: the best way to justify it would have been with counterevidence on the ethnicity and origins of Ham Mukasa’s mother, the Muhima lady Nyakazaana.

Note that Ham Mukasa was baptised the name “Ham”…that looks obvious. Do you wan to know why? Please let me if you want to know why.

If you want a copy of that last book I have quote, go to this link: http://www.archive.org/details/ugandaskatikiroi00mukaiala. It is a good 328 pages.

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Otto Patrick

STATEMENT BY HON. MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, H. ONEK ON THE SEARCH OF THE PREMISES OF THE DAILY MONITOR PUBLICATIONS AND THE RED PEPPER PUBLICATIONS


1) The on-going search by the Police of premises of the Daily Monitor publications and the Red Pepper publications is part of Police investigations into the letter that appeared in the Daily Monitor dated 7th May 2013, purportedly written by Gen. Sejusa to the Director General, Internal Security Organization, (ISO), and copied to a number of senior security officers, as well as investigation of documents, purportedly originating from Gen. Sejusa, that were published by the Red Pepper.

We wish to state from the outset, that in conducting this search, indeed, in carrying out this investigation, the Police have acted professionally, and within the law.

2) On Daily Monitor publications, the interest of the Police, and other sister agencies is to get the letter published by the Daily Monitor, and, given its security classification, investigate how the Daily Monitor got it, and possible violations of the law that may have been committed, especially, in respect of the Official Secrets Act, and the UPDF Act.

Logically, at the beginning of the investigation, the interest of the Police was to establish the authenticity of the letter published by the Daily Monitor. Police inquired from the Director General, ISO who stated that he never received the letter. The Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) as well as the Director General, External Security Organization (ESO), to whom the letter was supposed to have been copied to, also, did not receive their copies.

Evidently, at that stage, it was only the Daily Monitor, who was in possession of the letter. Accordingly, the CID then summoned the Managing Editor of Daily Monitor publications, and the journalist who authored the story in which the letter was published, to assist in getting the letter as well as disclose the source of the letter. They refused to cooperate with the CID.

Subsequently, the CID applied, and got a court order under sec.38 of the Press and Journalist Act, to compel them to cooperate. In addition, the CID got information that the Daily Monitor publications, was in possession of other documents in relation to the contents of the letter, which they intended to publish. They, then, in addition, sought and got, from court, a search warrant to search the premises of the Daily Monitor publications. The search warrant was served and, duly acknowledged by the management of the Daily Monitor.

The search began on Monday, 20th May 2013, and, is, still on-going. I wish to clarify that Daily Monitor publications, KFM, and Dembe FM have not been closed. They have been asked to halt operations to facilitate the search and investigations on their premises. Indeed, from the moment the search began, the premises were declared a scene of crime under the custody of the Police. Consequently, Monitor Publications, KFM and Dembe FM (which are on the premises) had to be asked to temporarily stop operations so that routine activities and traffic in the premises associated with their business do not interfere with Police work. The search will go on until the letter and those other documents relating to the letter are found. Police have asked the management of the Daily Monitor to cooperate so that they expedite the exercise. Indeed, the duration of the search depends on whether or not the Daily Monitor cooperates with the Police in their investigations. Todate, they have declined to cooperate.

3) We should point out that this is not the first time Police is carrying out a search. In the course of investigations, Police sometimes finds it necessary, as in this case, to carry out searches. Incidentally, even in this particular case, Police, earlier, carried out a search of the offices of Gen Sejusa in the presence of his lawyers without any incident, and the premises remain a scene of crime. It is, therefore, surprising that anybody should make issue of this routine procedure in investigations when it comes to searching media houses. Are media houses governed by laws other than those that the rest of society are governed?!

4) On the Red Pepper publications, the Police has initiated investigations into publication of documents, purportedly originating from Gen Sejusa, and published in successive stories in the Red Pepper for possible violation of criminal laws. Similar to the case of the Daily Monitor, the Police sought and got a search warrant to look for these and other related documents as well as stories which violate the laws of Uganda.

5) Noteworthy, while the Press and Journalist Act, sec. 2 gives the right to publish a newspaper, that right is not absolute. It is qualified by sec.3 of the Act, which provides that the right does not absolve any person from complying with other laws. Even without that section, the right to publish a newspaper cannot mean that journalists and publishers, in doing so, are free to commit crimes.

The Police is committed to the rule of law and to respect the rights and freedoms of the media, as well as other persons and groups. However, at the same time, we have a constitutional mandate to ensure that the laws of Uganda are respected and upheld.

6) In conclusion, let me emphasize and assure all of you that the Daily Monitor publications, KFM, Dembe FM, as well as the Red Pepper have not been closed.

Safe Houses:When the oppressed bite each other, instead of biting their oppressor or the cage trapping them, that is horizontal violence.


Interpersonal and intergroup group violence is so pervasive in Uganda that, what we see as torture in safe houses is just an aspect, if not a secondary or even tertiary symptom of a much bigger disease.

Those so-called state agents are not imported from mars. They are brought up in homes where spouses barter their partners. Many of those characters have seen their mothers being tortured by their fathers. Many have had their lips scalded by mothers when two grains of sugar were seen there….’abye sukali wange’. Many have grown up in homes where the husbands/dads are terrorist beasts, who, when they return in the evening after their war gin (waragi)/tekwe/foot-and-mouth drink (mwenge bigere) sessions, every body hides under their beds. Even the geckos and mice of the home scamper for cover because they know the husband is back.

The head teachers of the schools behave exactly the same way as those husbands…terrorists who cane the lights out of their pupils. Even the parish priests/sheikhs behave in the same way: they abuse and torture their flock…we have seen some in the news that sodomise young men in their flock. The nurses in dispensaries will whip the kid that is scared of the quinine injection, or scared of the pain of having a fracture set without anaesthetic…torture in itself.

So torture is all around! One of the modes of correcting wrong doers in Uganda is by killing them. You have 5 instances on your law books in which you reform wrong doers by killing them.. Every now and then you hear people saying: kill defilers, kill child sacrificers, kill embezzlers, kill reckless drivers, kill witch ‘doctors’. Civilians kill each other daily in frenzies of mob justice…they kill even the goats and chicken and banana plantations of victims of lynchings. If you are so liberal with “Kill”, why can’t you torture? When you torture you are being nice, in fact.

What we are experiencing is what psychologists call “horizontal violence”. When mice are trapped in a cage and they fail to find a way out, they start biting each others’ tails and ears off. By the time they are freed, they are even too weak to run away. When the oppressed bite each other, instead of biting their oppressor or the cage trapping them, that is horizontal violence. When they bite the cage in order to free themselves, that is called vertical violence…liberation. Ugandans, like all entrapped organisms have opted for horizontal attacks on each other….Kony cutting off ears of fellow Acholis in order to overthrow YK Museveni (and then a genius like one UPC supporter from Canada….. rationalizing or white washing Kony’s action by saying it is Kabaka Mutebi doing that)…all that is horizontal violence.

When you recruit someone from such a social context into the armed forces, what you have is someone who knows only one mode of interpersonal interaction: inflicting pain. Such a person will not disappoint. As they say, when the only tool one knows is the hammer, everything starts to look like a nail…even politicians will use the hammer as their campaigning symbol….Ssenyondo!

Bottom line, Uganda is a pervasively violent society, and the security agencies are just a perfect mirror image.Is there something called legal torture? Do state agents torture in order to find some use for the safe houses, which would otherwise stand idle? Are there types of houses that are specially constructed to be used as safe houses? Won’t you set caves on fire also?

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Otto Patrick

Abu Mayanja has never been a cabinet or other minister in any Obote regimes


In this photo:Abubakar Mayanja (C), Badru Kakungulu (2R), K. Nakibinge (R).(Courtesy of the Daily Monitor)

In this photo:Abubakar Mayanja (C), Badru Kakungulu (2R), K. Nakibinge (R).(Courtesy of the Daily Monitor)

For record purposes, Abu Mayanja has never been a cabinet or other minister in any Obote regimes. Despite the fact that he was a founder UNC Secretary General in UNC, and a founder member of UPC in 1960 when he was a Kabaka’s minister for Education, he became an MP in 1964, and was one of the KY members crossed to UPC on orders of Sir Edward Muteesa, to fight Obote from within, was detained without trial for criticizing the regime in ”Transition” magazine, was appointed Labour and later Education Minister by Idi Amin until he was dropped in 1974, and was DP MP representing Mityana from 1980 to 1982 before he went into exile.

Abu never served Obote as minister, for Obote feared him too much. He later served as Legal Advisor to Interim NRM Chairman, Yoweri Museveni during Nairobi Peace talks, became Information Minister, Third Deputy Premier, Minister of Justice / Attorney General, until he was dropped in 1994. He was however a French Talleyrand who served almost all regimes of the French Revolution, Napoleonic Era and Post Napoleon.

Buganda has many enemies but the arch enemy is some of the Baganda’s autocratic rulers. They have not learnt a lesson for 1953 Kabaka’s crisis and 1966 Uganda Crisis.

The politics of Museveni-dynasty arguably started when term limits were dropped from the constitution. So, Ugandans just opening their eyes now because Tinyefunza has spoken as just that: a bit blind, sometimes!

AHMED KATEREGA

These leaders carried so much hope for their nations in 1960s but they let us down. And Obote wasn’t a fuckin nationalist!


These leaders carried so much hope for their nations in 1960s but they let us down

These leaders carried so much hope for their nations in 1960s but they let us down

These leaders carried so much hope for their nations in 1960s but they let us down, and that’s why Africa is having all these problems. In the photo, recognize Mwalimu Nyere,Milton Obote,Jomo Kenyatta,Haile sailasie. Behind between Kenyatta is Kaunda,one with A hat is Mobutu,near Haile Sailasie is Bokasa.

As for AM Obote your so called nationalist, his words in the Uganda Herald of 24th April 1952 might help you to show his true credentials. He, the ”nationalist”, was reacting to formation of the UNC. Here went AM Obote the your nationalist:

“I shall be highly obliged if you would allow me space….to express the feelings of young enlightened Semi-Hamites and Nilotes about some of the aims of the congress. Not long ago, Mr Fenner Brockway, MP came to Uganda and concentrated his activities in and around Kampala. He returned to England and gave his version of the “Unification of all tribes in Uganda”….his version is a direct negation of the established traditions of the Semi-Hamites and the Norsemen (Nilotes) and…we are worried about it. It will, therefore, be of great interest to us if the Uganda National Congress will point out exactly what they mean by the “Unification of all tribes in Uganda”….Co-operation with the government is also recommended but we Semi-Hamites and Norsemen of Uganda feel that the congress is aiming at “Self-Government in Uganda,” is hastening and thereby leaving us behind. Because of our present inability to aim so high….it must be pointed out to the congress here and now that with us [Semi-Hamites and Norsemen], the question of questions lies in education and rapid development of African Local Governments…..the height of folly [on Musaazi's part] is the apparent omission ….of a definite aim to the slogan of “immediate Local Sel-Government in Uganda”

Those are the words of AM Obote, the great nationalist, the father of the nation. As you can see, national self government was none of AM Obote’s business. His was African Local governments! To the Doctor, independence was IK Musaazi’s folly.

You will recall that on 3rd February 1960 British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan made the declaration that, “The wind of change is blowing through this continent. Whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact.”

By that time, colonial powers had settled for the fact that they had to let go of the colonies. With or without people like AM Obote, the decision had already been reached. But listen to the UPC claiming that Uganda may never have become independent without Mr Obote’s sacrifices!

UPC’s is like the opportunism of a house girl whose tenure as the yaya coincides with the growth phase of the baby when it starts standing. Such a clueless house girl then hollers on and on that if she had not sang the song, “Butengenene, omwana ayimilidde” the baby would never ever have stood!….es[ecially when the baby eventually turns out to be Obama.

Typical housegirlish opportunism is what makes them think that they had a part to play in Uganda’s reversion to the current pseudoliberalism.

OTTO PATRICK

Obote with late Indira Gandhi.His party was also called congress and Indira Gandhi gave him a lot of material support.


oboteasiansObote with late Indira Gandhi.His party was also called congress and Indira Gandhi gave him a lot of material support.In 1980,the party got a lot of textiles from indi which it used during the campaigns! The Uganda Asian problems was not an Indian problem.The Asians were brought to Uganda by the British through the aegis of the IBEA Company as coolies to work on the Railways. When they reached Uganda,these Asians saw themselves as British subjects.Infact most of them had cut off their relations with India.

Now after Independence,the workforce in Uganda was to be representative of the Ugandan population. The British-Asians like all non indigenous Ugandan African were asked to take up Ugandan citizenship.A good number of them did,others opted to remain British-Asians and held on to their British passports.

Mwalimu,Gandhi and Obote.this is the Singapore Conference, that DR. Milton Obotte attended, in 1971, when General Idi Amin took full advantage, and became the President of Uganda, and later after about a year threw all ASIANS out of Uganda, with a 90 day Notice

Mwalimu,Gandhi and Obote.this is the Singapore Conference, that DR. Milton Obotte attended, in 1971, when General Idi Amin took full advantage, and became the President of Uganda, and later after about a year threw all ASIANS out of Uganda, with a 90 day Notice

When the nationalization program started,that is when their orderly repatriation to other British commonwealth countries began.This was around 1968. However when Idi Amin came,he decided to have a precipititious exodus and caused a lot of problems for the British government.Infact the majority of those British-Asians from Uganda were resettled in Canada.They still proudly call themselves Ugandans.

As regards to Obote and Indira’ party having contacts,it is more based on the ideology of the two parties.So,you can see why UPC and Congress I in India remained friends.

Dr.Awor Kipenji

Paulo Muwanga was anti Buganda establishment and he ‘stole’ the 1980 elections. He may not have been anti Baganda.


That white beauty dancing with Obote is actually the late Princess Margaret, the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.

That white beauty dancing with Obote is actually the late Princess Margaret, the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.

I think we need to be a little inhibited in our attempts to whitewash the shortcomings of the UPC and its key operatives like Mr Muwanga. These chaps were wicked and they knew it! It becomes a problem when we go to all lengths to rehabilitate them, even to the point of economising the truth.

Paul Muwanga was anti Buganda establishment or at Mmengo. He may not have been anti Baganda. I think he was pro-Baganda who are only UPCs. One of his victims was his brother the late Kafuuma, who was working with Masaka Cooperative Union, who died in Masaka barracks, even when Muwanga was defence minister. His crime was refusal to join UPC.Muwanga was a killer. As Vice President and Defence Minister. Over a half a million people were killed in a state inspired violence in Luwero Triangle and West Nile . He sided with killers like Milton Obote and Bazilio Olara Okello.

Paula Muwanga was the only Uganda ’s Vice President who had a wide ranger of powers other than appointing and sacking ministers. He at one time said that he had powers of live and death. He released a detainee and ordered the killing of another to demonstrate those powers. Muwanga was very powerful. In Masaka there was a UPC Haji, Kateregga, who had been convicted of an offense by the Magistrate’s court. He jetted in , summoned the Chief Magistrate and the District Commissioner and ordered the release of Kateregga with immediate effect. Muwanga was powerful, very powerful, as Vice President and Defence Minister. It is due to Obote’s weakness that Muwanga, with the Okellos, undermined Obote and cause the 1985 Saturday July 27th coup having met Ssemogerere and Museveni in Germany early that byear.

On the clampdown that was contained in Mr Muwanga’s proclamation of PM Thursaday 11 December 1980,The fact is that, each returning officer was to communicate results only to Paulo Muwanga himself and to provide him with a confidential report on “various aspects” of the poll.the Chairman of the Electoral Commission was knocked out of the reporting channels.

Remember that, Paul Muwanga’s proclamation was retrospective, and it gave him the power to declare the poll in individual constituencies invalid, as happened in the case of Mugwiisa/Sebuliba, Nakendo/Mwonda, Katama/Kitariko and Luwuliza/Wangola. It is horrible to be banned from celebrating; but even worse to be told that what you celebrated yesterday was rubbish.muwanga

In the 90s, I remember reading the report of the observers and I think under para. 140, must have been page 31, it was indicated that Mr Muwanga’s justification for giving himself extraordinary powers was something to do with the alleged incompetence of Returning Officers. He claimed that the ROs performed incompetently on 10 December, by opening polling stations late, and failing in distribution of polling materials. He claimed that he was worried that if reporting of results was left in the hands of such incompetent individuals at a crucial stage of the conclusion of the count, there would be serious problems. Yet he was supposed to base his judgement on the confidential reports of the same incompetent Returning Officers!

Police has not violated any laws in the Ssejusa-DailyMonitor-Redpepper saga, Says Kayihura


Folks,
Whatever we are doing is within the law. CID needs the letter published by the Daily Monitor, and other documents published by the Red Pepper purportedly originating from Gen Sejusa to assist in the investigation of possible criminality committed. CID sought cooperation from the management of the Daily Monitor and they refused to cooperate to handover the letter, and disclose their sources invoking protection from s.38 of the Press and Journalist Act.

Faced with this, the CID sought and got a court order to compel them to do so, as the same s.38 states that a journalist can be compelled to do so by a court order, among others.

The management of the Daily Monitor Publications have to date defied the court order. In fact, it is in anticipation of this that CID sought and got search warrants from court for both media houses. This is routine in investigations. It is consistent with any standards of investigative practice in any democracy. Moreover, these are not the first searches to be conducted by the Police in Uganda, or anywhere else in the whole.

It is not a violation of the lead judgment of the late Justice Mulenga in the Supreme Court case of Charles Onyango Obbo & another vs Attorney General SCC No 2 of 2002. The issues that were addressed were different. The Court did not rule that searching media houses violates rights and freedoms. They outlawed sections of the Penal Code Act providing for the offense of sedition which to their judgment were too widely worded that they could be used to unjustifiably violate freedoms and rights. The court did not declare that media rights and freedoms are absolute. Read the judgment well.

Let me remind you of Article 43(1) of the Constitution which states “In the enjoyment of the rights prescribed in this chapter, no person shall prejudice the fundamental or other human rights and freedoms of others or the public interest”. In fact, in his lead judgment, Justice Mulenga, my uncle as pointed out highlighted this constitutional position, saying there must be balance between exercising rights and freedoms and what he called the common interest.

Therefore, there is no inconsistency between what Justice Mulengs ruled and what the Police is doing under the leadership of his nephew. Ndugu, I have nothing to be ashamed of. Just serving my country diligently, and lawfully.

GEN KALE KAYIHURA
UAH MEMBER IN KAMPALA

Uganda Police in the Daily Monitor-Redpepper saga is comparable to the day the wakombozi went to Mulago and killed patients


Monitor Executive Editor Simon Freeman (R), News Editor Alex Atuhaire (C), and Managing Editor Don Wanyama

Monitor Executive Editor Simon Freeman (R), News Editor Alex Atuhaire (C), and Managing Editor Don Wanyama

Uganda Police has embarrassed us in the Daily Monitor-Redpepper saga. It is comparable to the day the wakombozi went to Mulago and killed patients there suspected to be Amin’s soldiers.Amidst the enormity of the crime by the Ugandan police-hear them that Monitor offices were a crime scene-some of us may have been aghast, but not surprised to see the Ugandan police, yes on orders of Lt General Kale Kayihura who led Makerere university students in 1979 to city square when wakamobozi entered Kampala and Amin’s soldiers fled. Such raids are actually not uncommon today under the IGP; they are normal and even banal.

Ironically, it was the late Justice Joseph Mulenga (RIP), an uncle to the IGP,Kayihura, who made the fundamental ruling on press freedom in Uganda. Now that he is dead, IGP kale Kayihura and his sidekicks’ bakabulimba Mary Okurut and Judith Nabakooba are pissing on those freedoms. Yes pissing on the while standing and telling lies.

This brings me to the question in the title. Folks, in 1979, when Wakombozii entered Kampala, many went straight to Mulago and other hospitals where they executed from close range patients suspected to be connected o Amin or the war. I was shocked to see patients shot in hospital beds. People it is true.

To IGP and his sidekicks, you are now the cats, while the majority of Ugandans are rats. Yes yesterday you feasted on Monitor and red pepper but please reflect on this saying. The rat that age will one day feast on the cat. Yep.

Folks, think about it, General Ssejusa courageously wrote the letter and sent it to the director of ISO to investigate allegations. I understand why the director of ISO feigns ignorance and denies ever receiving the said letter from General Ssejusa. So why would the IPG order his boys and girls to go and shut down the Monitor and Red Pepper to look for a letter which was written and sent to the director of ISO.

IGP Kale Kayihura shame on you. As they say ebbibimba bikka/what rises, come down eventually.

W.B. KYIJOMANYI
UAH member in NewYork

THE STORY OF THE CROW, THE HAWK AND THE COCK:Would you get worried as a Muganda if you read the following story from someone close to Museveni? What do you make of it?


Mutesa's body after being brought back by Amin

Mutesa’s body after being brought back by Amin

Once upon a sorry time! Once upon a time, there was a crow. That crow sat on her eggs in its nest, waiting for them to hatch. One chilly morning, in 1876 as the crow sat on her eggs, a slick, slithery serpent stole its way into the nest.

The smooth, sleek reptile, itself hatched in 886 when Alfred the Great defeated the Danes, punctured the eggs one by one, sucking all the yolk and white, and wiping out their viability once for all; doing so without the crow’s notice. After accomplishing its mission, the serpent slid out of the nest as stealthily as it had slunk in; all the while, never barging the mother crow’s slumber.

Like all incubating she-birds do every now and then, one warm afternoon, the crow left her nest for a minute or two to stretch and grab a snack, leaving her ‘eggs’ unprotected. It is then, in 1966 that tragedy struck – at least according to her. Alas, a hawk (kamunye) with a parting in his feathers swooped at the nest; and in a lightning’s moment, and with unimaginable ferocity, the hawk snatched all the ‘eggs’ from the nest.

A fierce tussle for the ‘eggs’ ensued between the two beasts of the air. It did not take the Kamunye long to register that it had swooped at empty shells, prompting it to jettison them into the undergrowth below, all without the notice of the combative crow. Thus the stage was set for an eternal, misdirected and futile feud between the hawk and the crow.

Weeks later, in 1986 another bird, (hatched in 1946), an ‘enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in mystery’ started gracing the airwaves. It is a bird that is one time a menacing vulture and another time the dove of peace; then another time, the wise old owl, yet another time a cuckoo that lays her eggs in other birds’ nests; then again an agile kingfisher and also a maladroit duck; one time an alluring rooster that heralds the arrival of a new day, and another time the hornbill that silences all feather wearers with its deafening melody, through 1996, 2006, who knows, 2016.

Grave of Dr. Milton Obote

Grave of Dr. Milton Obote

That Delphic new bird on the block shrewdly extricated the ‘eggs’ from the undergrowth and delicately placed them back in the now derelict nest, to the utter glee of the crow which has since then, continued to jealously and fiercely incubate the shells days on end, as new mating seasons continue to come and pass. And she whispers to herself that tragic lullaby, ‘Awangale’, ‘Hangiriza Agutamba’, ‘Rukirabasaija’, ‘Isebantu’, Irema………..ad nauseum.

Sorry! That was my story.

L/Cpl (rtd) Otto Patrick

UPDF has a structure but we should really focus also on policy and statecraft issues


Folks,
Kazini’s status: Have you heard of any former Army Commander in Africa being taken to prison for stealing a few shillings? Kazini, Major General, S.3 dropout. Otamuweka wapi? Tanzanian retired generals are diplomats, regional governors,etc. Could you trust Kazini with your herd of goats? How did such an individual like Kazini become the embodiment of the values of a very important national institution? I am told he still had some cases to answer for petty thieving. You know, when he was in Nigeria for senior command training, those officers there always wondered how he became a general. When they went out to look for ladies, Kazini would go in for those that befitted Nigerian Corporals! When he went to Ghana for a staff course, he nad a runin with an instructor. He was thrown off the course, escorted back to Uganda by the Ghanaian Military Police paka Entebbe , then they heard he was Chief of Staff, then Army Commander! Did they laugh or cry?

And with Kazini, when you talk to the average UPDF soldier, he will tell that if all he had left in his rifle were only two rounds of ammunition, and he found Kazini, Kony and Odhiambo in a dark corner, he would shoot Kazini twice in the head………

General Kazini….two words that are a heart-rending oxymoron!

Anyway as I said, ever since 1979, Uganda has tended to lean towards Tanzania in the manner of organising the military…for obvious reasons. Even subsequently when you did away with NRA, you opted for UPDF…mirroring TPDF. To appreciate the Uganda military arrangements, look at TPDF.

And by the way, the Tanzanians (and anybody else) would tell you that the Kenyan system is the one that is confused. Kenya lacks the conceptual grasp between ‘Command’ matters, i.e., everything to do with the general directing of operational matters (the teeth) and ‘Staff’ matters i.e., everything to do with directing support matters (the tail). The Joint Chief of staff in Tanzania is actually called the Chief of General Staff…he is in charge of Staff Officers that support the commanders. Kenyans call their biggest commander a ‘chief of staffs’ which is really funny….like referring to a headmaster as a head prefect. With the Tanzanians, the Chief of Staff is of a higher rank than the respective service commanders, making him the third most senior. The Tanzanians are also silent about the chiefs of staff of the respective services.

UPDF has a structure, Yes it does as President Museveni being the Commander-in-Chief, Gen Aronda Nyakayirima as the Chief of Defence Forces, Lt Gen I Koreta as the Deputy Chief of Defence Forces, Lt Gen Katumba Wamala is the Commander Land Forces, Brig Lusoke as the Joint Chief of Staff, Brig Angina Chief of Staff and other follow

There is the link to the Uganda MOD where the details of the UPDF can be found. The information appears to be in the public domain: Link: http://www.defenceuganda.mil.ug/about_updf.php?status=true

The link for the Army, which you Ugandans have elected to call the Land Forces is: http://www.defenceuganda.mil.ug/landforce.php?status=true..

The link for the Airforce is: http://www.defenceuganda.mil.ug/airforce.php?status=true.

The link for the Marines is: http://www.defenceuganda.mil.ug/marineforce.php?status=true

Of course Uganda is a land-locked country, so reference to ‘Marines’ is a misnomer. Our geography has nothing to do with the sea. May they should have referred to ‘Amphibious’ or ‘Lake-borne’

Note that, in terms of doctrine, whether organisational or tactical, Uganda has borrowed from Tanzania . Even when you look at Kenya , we need to be clear about the structure. The heads of the services (Army, Airforce, Navy) are respectively called Commanders, they are all at the same level, falling directly under the CGS–>VCGS.

In Uganda , instead of ‘General Staff’ you refer to Defence Forces. Gen Aronda is the CDF (equiv of CGS) and Gen Koreta is the Deputy CDF (equiv of VCGS). Gen. Koreta is not the Chief of Staff of the Army as you indicate. The army has its own command structure as a service with Gen Katumba as the commander. The same applies with the Airforce where there is a commander. Each of the Services has its chief of staff. The Joint Chief of Staff, Brig. Rusoke oversees the chiefs of staff of the services, and not the service commanders. The service commanders are answerable to the CDF through the Deputy CDF, just like in Kenya .

Gen Koreta, the Deputy CDF is senior to the respective service commanders (Katumab for the Army, Owoyesigire for the Ariforce)….no contradiction there.

Whether Kenya mentions its chiefs of staffs or not is a matter of preference but I am sure they do exist there too and operate in a similar manner. I think all you Ugandans have not done is to draw an organogram like Kenya has done.

Note that, for Kenya you refer to the Army Commander as the third highest ranking but that is not the case. All service commanders are at the same level…they are peers (see this link: http://www.mod..go.ke/Modsite/about.htm)

But even, all this debate about structure and personalities really takes us into the weeds: bottom line, it is trivial in regard the defence and security of Uganda .

But the question of Uganda ‘s institutional realities: Institutions are a mirror image of the societies that they service. How institutions function (and malfunction) is a culmination of historical factors, and a distillate of political realities. It may be a bit unrealistic for us to take the Kenyan arrangement as the norm for all time and all places. One may ask for example, why is it that following the 1964 mutiny of the East African militaries, did Mr Nyerere disarm, lock up and finally disband the Tanganyika Rifles completely, then Mr Kenyatta did the same but not as comprehensively yet Mr Obote decided to honour all the demands of the mutineers, increased their salaries, gave them promotions; dismissed the ringleaders and reinstated them half an hour later? Part of what we see today has roots right there in our history.

How many civil wars has Kenya or Tanzania had? Do those countries have the equivalent of Buganda , as an ‘indigestible element’ in national life, to use Huntington ‘s words in his ‘Political Order in Changing Societies’? How many times since 1964 has the Kenyan military been disbanded; and how about Uganda ? How many rebel groups has Kenya had? Uganda …anything up to thirty. Co-opting all those for the sake of short term harmony has always been at the expense of professionalism. The Katebe ‘institution’ is an embodiment of some for those skeletons in the closet of our political history.

At UAH, we should really focus also on policy and statecraft issues. This is where the future of the country can best be thought about instead of spending alot of time on recrimination, defensiveness and making comical promises. I will send you the country’s defence policy and the white paper on defence…..it is in such areas that incumbents should be put to task for the good of the country, not just hurling insults at them like we like to do here at UAH.

L/Cpl (rtd) Otto Patrick

PRESS STATEMENT ON THE SEARCH OF THE NATION MEDIA GROUP AND PAPER PUBLICATIONS


MONITORMembers of the Uganda Police Force this morning cordoned off the premises of the Nation Media Group in Namuwongo and Pepper Publications in Namanve. The FM radio stations – KFM and Dembe FM were taken off-air.

This is to reassure Ugandans that the government is not interfering with press freedom.

The search of the above premises comes on the heels of the utterances made by Gen. David Sejusa, aka Tinyefuza which have caused undue excitement. This is being treated as a matter of national security.

However the police is working within the parameters of the law, specifically, section 37 of the Penal Code which bars the publication of information prejudicial to national security.

The Police went through the due legal process and secured a court order – which was issued by a court of competent jurisdiction (Nakawa Chief Magistrates Court).

There is therefore nothing untoward or surprising about the procedures used, as great care has been taken to follow the law to the letter. For the time being the premises in question are being treated as crime scenes.

As soon as investigations are over – which will be very soon as police is under instructions to handle the matter expeditiously – the premises will be duly handed back to the owners.

About social media

This is also to quash rumours going round that Social Media has been banned or that the platforms are about to be closed. This is not true. There is no plan to switch off or disconnect Social Media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.

Hon. Mary Karooro Okurut (Mrs)

Minister of Information and National Guidance

A Ugandan Colonel (whether Acholi, Langi or Munyankore) earns about the equivalent of $ 6,000 per year where as his British counterpart earns $150,000


Below are the groups that make up the UPDF. An alphabetic listing of the UPDF would probably show that, about 40% of the surnames start with letter ‘O’, and not because they are Otafiire, Owoyesigire, Owakubariho Omulyannaka, Omutego-kweguli or Owobusingye. It is the ‘Okellos’, again! Infact the single name ‘Okello’ may be anything up to 10%.

It may not be advisable to assume that 80% of the force is from one ethnic group. I would suggest that you get yourself acquainted as quickly as you can,to the reality that, the rank and file of the Ugandan military is an amalgam of at least two dozen pliticomilitary groups that have graced the country in the last three or so decades, and not those Tutsis and Rwandese as many of you here like to refer to them. The NRA is just one out those many groups that make up the UPDF, and the original NRA soldier is now a very, very, very rare commodity. And by the way, that is not to imply that, yeah, good riddance.

One time, James Kazini, the disgraced former head of the UPDF boasted that there were about 6,000 UPDFs from Nyabushozi county only. I do not think he really knew what he was talking about.

Here are the groups:

1. National Resistance Army (NRA)

2. Uganda National Liberation Army (UNLA)

3. Uganda People’s Democratic Army (UPDM/A)

4. Uganda People’s Army (UPA)

5. Ruwenzururu Kingdom Freedom Movement

6. Uganda Freedom Movement (UFM)

7. Uganda Mujahdeen Movement (UMM)

8. Ninth October Movement/Army (NOM/A)

9. Allied Democratic Front/Force (ADF)

10. Force Obote Back Army (FOBA),

11. Federal Democratic Movement (Fedemo)

12. West Nile Bank Front (WNBF) I &II

13. Uganda National Democratic Alliance (UNDA)

14. National Army for the Liberation of Uganda (NALU)

15. Uganda National Rescue Front (UNRF) I &II

16. Holy Spirit Movement/Holy Spirit Mobile Forces (HSM) I & II

17. Citizen Army for Multiparty Politics (CAMP),

18. Action Restore Justice (ARJ)

19. Former Uganda National Army (FUNA),

20. Anti-Referendum Army (ARA),

21. Peoples’ Redemption Army (PRA)

22. Uganda Salvation Force/Army (USF/A)

23. Lord’s Army

24. Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA)

Many of the UPDF riflemen were born after 1986…may be 90% of the young boys in UPDF battalions. The UPC many of them know is the group that in the 2006 elections polled 0.82% of the votes, behind a young independent man that polled 0.95%. That is all they know!

Many are from the groups I have listed for you above. They joined the UPDF to earn a living, they work under severe hardships, when their bosses are busy stealing their pay and procuring for them substandard equipment. Several were integrated into the UPDF from anti-NRM insurgency groupings which they were gangpressed into joining, through grissly initiations like murdering their own parents and siblings.

The great majority of those boys are yearning for a change that can make their situation better than it is now. 100% of those boys who joined the UPDF through regular recruitment did not receive pay as recruits because Uganda is the only country in the world that does not pay its recruit during the first nine or more months of initial training. This is the situation in the UPDF, and ironically, that was the situation in the UNLA…..

Just as an example, A Ugandan Colonel (whether Acholi, Langi or Munyankore) earns about the equivalent of $ 6,000 per year where as his British counterpart earns $150,000. That UPDF Colonel needs to hear voices that promise to alleviate his plight, and not those like yours, that are bent on demonising him. A future government that holds childish views about the hard-pressed UPDF soldier definitely alienates itself in advance.

For those of you who keep referring to the UPDF as ‘Tutsi/Rwandese’, you cannot imagine what anger you cause for young boys who are living under serious hardships. Somehow, you end up politicising them, and poisoning them against your own interests.

We are all sympathetic with the conditions of our civil servants and soldiers serve in due to their numerical strength; police, army, teachers, nurses. Our economy can not make make for them havens. Unlike UA and UNLA, this is a people’s army which has successfully transformed from a guerilla force to a professional army. They are political but not partisan, so they know from where we have come from, where we have reached and where we are going. Some of you seem not confortable with the name NRA. But let me remind you that when DP wanted to change UNLA name to UA,. UPC led by Defence Minister Paulo Muwanga refused. Fortunately UPDF was a consensus in Constituent Assembly since the army was NRA, the draft recommended for UAF and they all agreed with UPDF. Initially Sebaana Kizito was not confirtable with it because of the word people which, he said would reminding him of UPC and its atrocities. The army and the media are so crucial in the politics of Uganda and else where and those who are hostile to them will never see the gates of State House.

One of the stupid things President George Bush was to dismantle the Iraqi army, one million strong. It has taught him and his occupiers a lesson. A similar mistake was made by Tanzanians in 1979 when they banded Uganda Armed Forces as Idi Amin’s personal army. They regrouped in the Sudan and DR Congo and almost went with Obote and Okello Lutwa’s heads in Koboko in 1980. Ask Barig.Robert Rwenhururu.They became a prey for Isaac Lumago, Moses Ali, Faruq Minawa, Lutakome Kayiira and Yoweri Museveni’s recruitment against Obote ll regime. Brig.Kasirye Gwanga has been giving testimonies to that effect. Therefore any politician abusing UPDF will never step into power even for a day.


L/Cpl (rtd) Otto Patrick
and Ahmed Katerega

The Common Man’s Charter – Luganda version


Ekiwandiiko The Common Man’s Charter

Akatabo ka The Common Man’s Charter, mu Luganda aba UPC kyebavvuunula nti Okununulibwa kw’omuntu owabulijjo, mu bufuunze kaali kefanaanyirizaako bwe kati:

Kaalimu obuwendo oba ebitundu ebyawuliddwamu 44 nga bikubiddwa ku mpapula 18. Ku lupapula olusooka munda, kwaliko ekifaananyi ky’Obote n’ennyanjula gyeyali awandiise ng’omukulembeze w’ekibiina. Ku lupapula olwokubiri, kwaliko enkola y’ekibiina kya UPC. Olwokuba nti ekibiina kino kye kyali mu buyinza, enkola eno yali eraga nga bwe kyali kyezizza enkiiko za disitulikiti, ez’ebibuga era n’enkolagana eyaliwo wakati w’ensi za East Africa. Wano nno mbu kye kyava kisalawo okuwagira Charter mbu olwo ebyagendererwa mu kwefuga biryoke bissibwe mu nkola nga tugoberera enkola eya Nnaakalyako-ani (Socialism).

Akawendo akokubiri, ku lupapula lwe lumu, Obote yannyonnyola nga UPC bwe kyali kigenda okumalawo okutya kwonna n’oluvannyuma wabeerewo obwenkanya, okwenkanankana, eddembe n’okwesiima eri abaana ba Uganda ab’omu mirembe egiribeerawo nga bayita mu kutambulira ku kkono.

Akawendo akokusatu, Obote yategeeza nga bwe bakkiririza mu nfuga eya Republic (awatali bwakabaka) era nga kino kyekyali ekinyusi mu kusalawo okutandika okutambulira ku kkono basobole okuziyiza omuntu yenna oba akabiina konna okusajjalaatira ku bantu abalala n’okubafuga bonna oba ekitundu ekimu ekya Uganda, nga bwe gwali mu mirembe ng’Obwakabaka bukyaliwo. Bo aba UPC baali baagala abantu ba Uganda be baba beramulira ebintu byabwe ebibakwatako!

Akawendo akokuna, Obote yategeeza nga ye n’ekibiina kye bwe besammulira ddala mu birowoozo ne mu bikolwa, Uganda oba ekintundu kyayo ekimu okubeera ettwale ly’omuntu omu; okusikira ebifo olw’obuzaale bw’omuntu nga bwe kiri mu b’olulyo olulangira; obwabifekeera oba obunyunyuunsi nabyo nga muziro! Abagwira okujja mu Uganda ne babeera n’ebintu byabwe ebikusike oba okugezaako okuwugula abantu b’ensi eno, ogwo nagwo nga muziro. Ebintu ebikolebwa okuvaamu amagoba agagenda okugasa abantu abatono nga nakyo muziro.

Akawendo akokutaano, Obote yategeeza nga UPC bwetakkiririza mu kitundu ekimu ekya Uganda okwesalako okuva ku Uganda oba yadde Uganda okweyawula ku nsi eziri mu mukago gw’obuvanyubwa bw’Africa (East African Community) okutwalira awamu.

Akawendo akomukaaga kaali kagamba nga bbo aba UPC okuviira ddala ku ntandikwa bwe baali bakkiririza mu buyinza bw’abantu (empowerment of the masses) era nga balagirwa nti buli kintu kyonna ekikolebwa mu Uganda kiba kirina kukolebwa ku lwa bulungi bw’abantu bonna era n’olw’ensonga eyo kye bava bakakasa bino wammanga:

i) Okuzimba Uganda ng’ensi emu erimu abantu bamu, olukiiko lumu ne gavumenti emu nga ya Republic;

ii) Okutaasa obwetwaze bwa Uganda n’okukuuma eddembe n’obutebenkevu wamu n’Entegeka y’obufuzi eya 1967;

iii) Okutereeza ekibiina kya UPC abantu bannansi basobole okubaako kye bakola ku ebyo ebikwata ku nsi yabooffe;

iv) Okulwanira ddala obutassa ngabo mu kugoba Obwavu, Obutamanya, Endwadde (Poverty, Ignorance and Disease) wamu n’obufuzi bw’amatwale obw’obumbula obutakubwa ku mukono n’okusosola okwa langi;

v) Okukulaakulanya eby’enfuna ya Uganda nga gavumenti yeyamba amakampuni gaayo, ebibiina eby’obwegassi, amakampuni g’abantu ge betandikira ku bwabwe, amakolero, abasuubuzi n’abalimi;

vi) Okutaasa buli muntu ali mu Uganda kasita abeeramu mu mateeka, awatali kusosola mu langi, eddiini oba olulyo lwe; asobole okweyagalira mu Uganda;

vii) Okukakasiza ddala nga tewaba muntu yenna munnayuganda aweebwa buyinza obukusike, oba embeera, oba ekitiibwa okusinziira ku buzaale bwe oba olulyo lwe mw’asibuka;

viii) Okulabira ddala nga mpaawo muntu ayinza kwekiika mu maaso g’emigaso gy’eggwanga, oba eddembe ly’omulala;

ix) Okuwagira ebibiina oba amawanga ebirina ebigenderwa oba ebiruubirirwa ebifaanana n’ebya UPC;

x) Okukolanga ebintu ebirala ebiringa ebyo UPC bye kigenderera okukola.

Akawendo akomusanvu kakkaatiriza nga Uganda bwe yamala edda okufuuka Republic okuva ku nfuga eya Federo era n’ey’ensikirano ey’obwakabaka. Obote yaggumiza ng’okulwanirira n’okukuuma obwetwaze bwe bitaali byakukoma, era ng’olutalo luno lwatandika nga 09/10/62. Yagamba nti olunaku olwo kyali kikyamu okulufuula kkome-kkome ng’ekkubo ly’e Bubebbere (end of the road) abantu webagabanira ebintu okusinziira ku ndowooza zaabwe.

Akawendo akomunaana kaali kanyweza ebigendererwa bya UPC okwewala enkola n’endowooza ey’obufuzi bw’amatwale n’okulekera awo okulowoolereza mu mawanga, okusuula ebbala endowooza y’okubeera n’ebintu ebikusike ebitakwatibwako.

Akawendo akomwenda, Obote yasojjasojja abafuzi ab’ensikirano mu lugezigezi bwe yagamba nti yali talaba nsonga yali ebobbesa bantu mitwe ng’ebiseera eby’okwefuga bisembera. Yagamba nti ebintu ebyayogerwangako ennyo nga bino:

a) Uganda bw’erimala okwefuga, tulifuna gavumenti ya ngeri ki?

b) Ani alibeera omutwe gw’eggwanga nga tumaze okwefuga?

Obote yagamba nti ebintu ebyo byazimbulukusibwa nnyo ne bituuka okulabika ng’ebikulu ennyo eri eggwanga. Wano Obote weyagambira nti amagezi ag’okuvvuunuka ebizibu ebyo bwe gaazuuka si ge gaali ag’okulongoosa embera y’omuntu owa bulijjo; naye olw’okuba ng’abo abaali abanyuunyuunsi (abafuzi ab’ensikirano) baali ng’abantu babalina mu ngalo, baalaba ng’okwefuga kyali kijja kuba kya kabi eri ebifo byabwe ebikusike. Awo nno mbu abafuzi bano kwe kusala amagezi ebifo byabwe babifuulire ddala eby’omugaso eri omuntu owa bulijjo, kwe kugamba nti ng’okwogera ku bifo byabwe ebyo nga kitegeeza kugendana n’omutindo gw’omuntu owa bulijjo. Obote mu kawendo kano yagamba nga bwe wataali kubuusabuusa nti ebifo by’abanyuunyuunsi bano byali bitangira omuntu owa bulijjo okwenyigira mu by’obufuzi bwa Uganda eyali yeefuga nga 09/10/62 kubanga abanyuunyuunsi (bakabaka) baayagala okwongera okufuga nga bwe baakolanga edda ng’Omungereza tannajja, ne bataagala omuntu owabulijjo okubaako ky’agamba mu kutereeza embeera ya Uganda eyeefuga. Kyokka kati embeera eyo mbu yali eggyiddwawo era ng’omuntu owabulijjo wa ddembe okwesalirawo ku mbeera ye n’atabeera muddu wa muntu munne. Abantu kati baddembe okwogera kaati kyonna ekibaluma kasita bakikola nga bayita mu mateeka g’ensi agatakolebwa mu nkiiko njawufu, wabula mu lukiiko olumu; National Assembly, abantu mwe balina eddoboozi erimu nga bayita mu babaka baabwe.

Akawendo akekkumi, Obote yagamba nga okufuulibwa kwa Uganda okuba Repabulika bwe kyali kigisembezza okumpi ne ggoolo ey’okwefuga okujjuvu era n’okwetakkuluza ku Bamwanawaani okuva mu 1966. Abantu abo bwe baali nga bakyali mu by’obufuzi n’eby’enfuna bya Uganda, kyali kizibu obutabafaako. Kisaana kimanyibwe nti abantu abalina enkola eya mwanawaani mu by’obufuzi n’eby’enfuna tebalema kusigala mabega mu bintu ebikwata ku nsi yaabwe n’ensi z’ebweru. Kati nno nga tumaze okuggyawo enkola eya mwanawaani mu by’obufuzi n’eby’enfuna tuteekwa okukola ebintu bibiri:

1. Okukkiriza ebifo ebyalimu bamwanawaani ab’edda okuddamu bamwanawaani abapya;

2. Okwewala okuleetawo bamwanawaani abapya abalina endowooza ya mwanawaani.

Akawendo akekkumi n’akamu; Obote yagamba nti okugoberera enkola ya Nnaakalyako ani kwe kutandikawo endowooza y’eby’obufuzi empya n’embeera empya etegeeza nti bannayuganda bonna awamu, ebintu ebikwata ku by’obulungi bwabwe ne ku ddoboozi lyabwe mu gavumenti y’eggwanga lyabwe ne ku bukiiko obulala obw’ebitundu nga byonna babitwala nga bikulu ddala. Enkola ya Nnaakalyako Ani ewakanya enkola eya Mwanawaani.

Akawendo akekkumi n’obubiri; Obote yajjukiza nga mu 1968 ekibiina kya UPC bwe kyayima mu lukiiko lwabwe ne kiyisa ekiteeso ekiggyawo enkola ezimba eggwanga erimu n’enkola ya Mwanawaani okusobola okussaawo enkola eya Repabulika. UPC kyasiima nnyo abakulembeze ba gavumenti olw’okutandikawo enkola empya eyali egenda okukyusa ku by’enfuna n’okuleetawo obwenkanya mu by’obufuzi n’embeera z’abantu ababulijjo. Ekibiina kya UPC kyasalawo abantu n’ebintu bissibwe ku mulimu gw’okuzimba eggwanga era ne kiragira olukiiko lwakyo olwa ttabamiruka (National Council) okwetegereza amakubo n’amagezi ag’okussa ebibiina byonna ebya gavumenti n’ebitali bya gavumenti okukolera awamu ne UPC mu kuzimba eggwanga.

Akawendo akekkumi n’obusatu; Obote yagamba nti baali bakimanyi bulungi nga bwe waaliwo abantu bangi abaali tebamanyi bulungi oba abaali bawubisibwawubisibwa ku mulimu gw’okuzimba eggwanga n’okutegeera obukulu bwagwo. Wano kwe kugamba nti kyali kibakakatako bbo ng’ekibiina okubuulirira abo abaali balimbibwalimbibwa n’okubatangaaza nga bwe kyali kisaanidde ebibiina byonna okukolera awamu n’abantu bonna mu kuweereza eggwanga.

Akawendo akekkumi n’obuna; Obote yagamba nti UPC bwe kiba ne kyekiteekateeka okukola olw’obulungi bw’abantu, kiba kitegeeza Abantu bamu, mu nsi emu, abalina gavumenti emu. Yagamba nti mu myaka omusanvu gye baali bamaze mu kwefuga UPC kyali kifubye nnyo okunnyonnyola nti omuntu okuba ow’ekika gundi, oba akawanga gundi, oba okwogera olulimi gundi, oba okusoma eddiini gundi, tekirina kye kimwongerako. Naye okuba munnayuganda kyo kirina kye kyongerera ddala ku muntu kubanga kimufunyisa byonna byateekwa okufuna n’asobola okukolera ab’ekika kye, akawanga ke, eddiini ye, ekitundu kye by’ateekwa okubakolera kasita biba nga tebiziyizibwa mateeka agayisibwa mu lukiiko lw’eggwanga.

Akawendo akekkumi n’obutaano; Obote yagamba nti mu myaka omusaavu bukya bannayuganda bafuna bwetwaze, UPC yali erabye nga bannayuganda bakwasi b’amateeka era abantu abaagala ennyo abantu b’omu maka gaabwe n’emiriraano ne Uganda yonna awamu okubaamu eddembe. Yayongera n’agamba nti bannayuganda era baali bategeera bulungi nga bwe kyali kisaanidde okugaziya eby’enfuna n’okusitula omulembe ogw’omuntu owabulijjo. Baali beegomba nnyo okusitula embeera z’obulamu bwabwe nga beetabira mu bibiina bya gavumenti era nga babirinamu eddoboozi erimala. Kyokka UPC yali erabyewo akabi akaali mu kirungi ekyo; ab’amawanga ag’ebweru okutulondera abakulembeze n’okweyingiza mu by’obufuzi bwa Uganda ng’ekigendererwa kwe kufunyisa amawanga gaabwe ebirungi kyokka nga beeyambisa bannayuganda okutuuka ku bye baagala. Tekyali mu nkola ya Uganda okugumiikiriza empisa ey’okwonoona ebirowoozo by’abantu n’okubaterebula mu byetaago byabwe.

Akawendo akekkumi nomukaaga; Obote yagamba nti UPC kati kyali kiraba ng’ekimu ku bintu Uganda bye yali eyolekedde okulowoozaako nga bye biseera by’abavubuka eby’omu maaso. Kino okusobola okukifumiitiriza obulungi, omuntu yali asaana okutunuulira omuwendo gw’abavubuka abali mu Yunivasite, amasomero ga ssekendule, aga pulayimale ne mu matendekero agatali gamu kyokka okwo ng’abaana abatudde obutuuzi eka tobagasseeko. Mukutunuulira emiwendo gy’abaana abo omuntu yali asobola okumanya ng’abo be bannayuganda abateekebwateekebwa okwetikka obuvunaanyizibwa obw’okwongera okunyweza obwetwaze bwaffe n’okuggula amakubo amalala agalituusa bannayuganda ku kwefuga kwennyini mu by’enfuna n’embeera z’abantu.

Akawendo akekkumi nomusaanvu; Obote yagamba nti singa abavubuka batendekebwa kukolera mu gavumenti za buwanga bwabwe zokka (wano yali akoona Bwakabaka – Omuwandiisi) e mu nkiiko zaabwe mu mpisa zaabwe; ng’ebintu ebyo byeyambisibwa okwesalaasalamu obutundu n’ebibiina; olwo UPC yandibadde terina ky’eyambye ku mulimu gw’okukyusa Africa era n’abavubuka abo bandibadde tebaweereddwa ekyo ekibagwanira okutunuulira Uganda yonna mu kifo ky’okulowoolereza mu katundu akamu kokka. Uganda yali teyinza kukolera bavubuka baayo ttima lyenkana awo.

Akawendo akekkumi nomunaana; Obote yagamba nti UPC teyalina kulowooza ku bavubuka bokka, naye n’abakulu nabo baali ba muwendo ng’abavubuka. Yagamba nti abakadde n’abajenjebu nabo baali batekwa okulowoozebwako kubanga obuwanga (tribe) bwabwe bwokka ku bwabwo bwali tebukyasobola kubawa byetaago byabwe eby’omulembe guno oba n’okukuuma obulamu bwabwe n’ebintu byabwe oba okubayisa ng’abantu mu nsi yaabwe eyeefuga.

Akawendo akekkumi nomwenda; Obote yagamba nti akiddamu lunye nti olutalo lw’okwefuga terwalwanibwa kawanga kamu era terwali lwa bantu ba ddiini emu. Yagamba nti abafuzi Abangereza baawulira enduulu nga ziva mu nsonda za Uganda zonna. Olutalo terwalwanibwa okuzza ebitundu bya Uganda ebimu mu nnyombo z’obuwanga ez’edda (kirabika wano yali akoona Buganda ku masaza g’e Buyaga ne Bugangaizi – Omuwandiisi) ne mu butatabagana era n’entalo, wabula lwalwanibwa okuleetawo embeera empya abantu ba Uganda bonna mwe bali obumu, mu nsi emu era n’okweddiza ekitiibwa kyabwe bayisibwenga ng’abantu.

Akawendo akaabiri; Obote yagamba nti kyali kimanyiddwa bulungi nti Uganda yali nsi ekyakul era nti mu kukkiriza entegeka ey’enkola ya Nnaakalyako Ani UPC yali esoose kwetegereza nnyo ebintu nga bwe byali mu kiseera ekyo. Yagamba nti emyaka enkaaga mu omwenda (1894 – 1962) egy’enfuga y’abazungu bannayuganda gye baamala nga bayigirizibwa okumanya era n’okunywereza ddala enkola y’ekingereza gyali giviiriddemu abantu baffe okukulira mu ndowooza eyo era nga n’ebikolebwa bikolebwa mu ngeri eyo. Ebintu ebyaleetebwa Abangereza mu bbanga ery’obukuumi bwa Bungereza (British Protectorate), bannayuganda baabitwala nga byebisingira ddala obulungi mu kukulaakulanya eby’obugagga bwaffe ne mu nkolagana n’abantu. Bwe kityo ne kibeera nti mu bufuge ne mu kwefuga abantu baasigala mu mbeera y’obulamu eyaleetebwa abagwira. (Bannange kambuuze, olwo lwaki Obote yali takkiriza Buganda okwetakkuluza ku nfuga ey’ekipooli eyaleetebwa Abangereza? – Muwandiisi)

Akawendo akaabiri mu akamu; Obote yagamba nti UPC yali teyinza kukkiriza mawanga abiri okukulaakulanira mu Uganda; kwe kugamba erimu nga ggagga, liyigirize, ly’Afrika mu ndabika naye nga mu ndowooza ggwira (wano yali ategeeza Baganda – Omuwandiisi); ate eddala nga lye lirimu n’abantu abasingira ddala obungi kyokka lyo nga lyavu era n’okusoma nga terisomyeko. Yagamba nti bo aba UPC baali tebalowooza nti byonna eby’obuwangwa bwaffe obw’eky’Afrika kati bikkirizibwa ng’ebigoberera enkola ya Nnaakalyako Ani (wano yali ku bwakabaka n’empisa z’Abaganda); gamba UPC tekkiriza nti abakulembeze b’obuwanga bandibadde n’ebbeetu okukozesa abantu b’obuwanga obwo byonna bye baagala olw’obulungi bwabwe bo ng’abakulembeze. Obote yayongera okugamba nti mu ngeri y’emu baali tebakkiriza ng’enkola eya Mwanawaani (obwami n’obulangira – omuwandiisi) newandibadde nga enkola eno yali ebadde mu Uganda n’emu Afrika okumala emyaka mingi nnyo yali esaana esigale bwetyo. (Wano Obote yeerabira nti buli ggwanga n’ebyalyo. Ova otya e Lango gye basuusuuta akalo n’ojja e Buganda okubagamba nga amatooke bwe gataliimu? – omuwandiisi). Obote wano kwe kugamba nti Uganda yalina okulondawo ekimu ku bibiri: okusigala ku nkola eyasangibwawo ng’abafuzi b’amatwale bazze era netuyigirizibwa okugoberera eby’abagwira ebitalina musingi gutegeerekeka; oba okugoberera entegeka eya Nnaakalyako Ani egendera ku bintu nga bwe biri mu nsi yaffe. Bbo nga UPC baali basazeewo okugoberera enkola eya Nnaakalyako Ani.

Akawendo akaabiri mu obubiri; Obote yagamba nti bbo aba UPC baali tebakkiriza ekigambo ky’okubaawo akabinja akasoolooba ku balala era n’akabinja ako okukozesa obuyinza bwa Mwanawaani. Obote ne banne era baali bakkiriza nti okuva okuva mu byafaayo byaffe, si ntegeka ya bya njigiriza yaffe yokka ye yagoberera omusingi ogwaliwo nga tetunneefuga naye n’eby’obusuubuzi, n’amakolero n’abantu bennyini abaali mu gavumenti oba ebweru waayo; byonna byagenda biteekawo enjawulo wakati w’abaggagga n’abantu abalala abasinga obungi. Enkola ya Nnaakalyako Ani ye yokka eyali egenda okumalawo enjawulo eyo.

Akawendo akaabiri mu obusatu; Obote yagamba nti baali balabawo engeri bbiri eziyinza okuyamba n’okukuza ekitundu ky’abantu abamu ne baba n’enkizo ku balala:

1. Entegeka y’eby’enjigiriza egenderera okuteekawo abantu abalowooza nti olw’obuyigirize bwabwe bo be bafuga abo abatali bayigirize era n’okubalowoozaako ng’abaweereza baabwe.

2. Abayigirize, ate nga be batono, be basinga okuba n’emikisa egy’okufuna emirimu egy’okwekozesa bokka mu by’obusuubuzi n’eby’amakolero era n’okuweebwa emirimu mu gavumenti n’awalala. Kyokka abantu bano mu kifo ky’okukola kyonna ekisoboka okuyamba abo abataayigirizibwa okusobola okubenkana, badda mu kuyamba ba ηηaanda zaabwe. Enkola eno eviiramu ddala obuteesigwa mu by’emirimu era n’okukozesa obubi obuvunaanyizibwa.

Akawendo akaabiri mu obuna; Obote yagamba nti munnayuganda owabulijjo okukula kw’ensi yali akulowooleza mu kweyongera kufuna nsimbi mu nsawo ye. Ssente ezo ayinza okuba nga yali aziggya mu bibye bye yeekolera oba mu kukozesebwa. Wabula omuntu owabulijjo ky’asinga okulowoozaako ng’ekikulu ye gavumenti okumuteerawo ebintu eby’obwereere ensimbi ze zireme okugenda kw’ebyo bye yeetaga mu bulamu bwe naye zidde mu nsawo ye asobole okwekolera ebibye by’ayagala. Akabi akali mu kino kali nti omuntu oyo yeerabira nti mu kukulaakulanya ensi, gavumenti eba erina ebintu ebirala bisatu by’eteekwa okufaako era nga bye bino:

THE COMMON MAN’S CHARTER(English Version):THE MOVE TO THE LEFT” by DR. A MILTON OBOTE


Proposals for document No. 1 on “THE MOVE TO THE LEFT” by DR. A MILTON OBOTE

President of the Uganda Peoples Congress to the Annual Delegates’ Conference

of the UGANDA PEOPLES CONGRESS

FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT

In June, 1968 the Annual Delegates’ Conference of the Uganda People’s Congress passed a number of far-reaching Resolutions. The National Council, the Central Executive Committee and the officials of the Party, were directed by the Conference to implement those resolutions.

As President of the Party I have made a detailed study of the implications behind the Resolutions passed in the June, 1968 Conference and the methods of carrying them out. As a result, officials of the Party and I have produced a document – Proposals for National Service (Document No. 2 on “The Move to the Left”) to implement some aspects of the Conference Resolutions.

It is my sincere belief that in June, 1968 the Party Conference clearly indicated that the Party and Uganda as a whole must take initial steps, as early as possible, to move ideologically and practically to the Left. The practical steps for and the degree of commitment by Party members to such a move were not defined at the Conference. It has been my responsibility as the President of the Party to codify all that the Party stands for and the principles which have been basic characteristics of the Party since its foundation. In this exercise officials of the Party, members of the Party and other persons have been of the greatest assistance in enabling me to interpret the Party Resolutions.

I hereby present to the Central Executive Committee, to the National Council and to the Annual Delegates’ Conference, these same principles and the strategy for the implementation of the June, 1968 Resolutions. Similarly, I commend this document to the people of Uganda and to all our well-wishers.

A. MILTON OBOTE

President

Uganda People’s Congress

THE COMMON MAN’S CHARTER

FIRST STEPS FOR UGANDA TO MOVE TO THE LEFT

1. We the members of the Annual Delegates’ Conference of the Uganda People’s Congress, assembled on this Twenty-Fourth Day of October, 1969, in an Emergency Meeting in Kampala; being the body charged under the Constitution of the Uganda People’s Congress with the responsibility “to lay down the broad basic policy of the Party” and being conscious of our responsibility and of the fact that the Government of the Republic of Uganda, District Administrations and Urban Authorities are currently run by our Party and on policies and programmes adopted by our Party and recognising our responsibility to the people of Uganda as a whole and to the association of Uganda, Tanzania and Kenya in the East African Community and to Uganda’s Membership of the Organisation of African Unity, do hereby adopt this Charter for the realisation of the real meaning of Independence, namely, that the resources of the country, material and human, be exploited for the benefit of all the people of Uganda in accordance with the principles of Socialism.

2. We hereby commit ourselves to create in Uganda conditions of full security, justice, equality, liberty and welfare for all sons and daughters of the Republic of Uganda and for the realisation of those goals we have adopted the Move to the Left Strategy herein laid as initial steps.

3. We subscribe fully to Uganda always being a Republic and have adopted this Charter so that the implementation of this Strategy prevents effectively any one person or group of persons from being masters of all or a section of the people of Uganda, and ensure that all citizens of Uganda become truly masters of their own destiny.

4. We reject, both in theory and in practice, that Uganda as a whole or any part of it should be the domain of any person, of feudalism, of Capitalism, of vested interests of one kind or another, of foreign influence or of foreigners. We further reject exploitation of material and human resources for the benefit of a few.

5. We reject, both in theory and in practice, isolationism in regard to one part of Uganda towards another, or in regard to Uganda as a whole to the East African Community in particular, and Africa in general.

6. Recognising that the roots of the U.P.C. have always been in the people right from its formation, and realising that the Party has always commanded us that whatever is done in Uganda must be done for the benefit of all, we hereby re-affirm our acceptance of the aims and objectives of the U.P.C., which we set out below in full:

(i) To build the Republic of Uganda as one country with one people, one Parliament and one Government.

(ii) To defend the Independence and Sovereignty of Uganda and maintain peace and tranquillity, and to preserve the republican Constitution of Uganda.

(iii) To organise the Party to enable the people to participate in framing the destiny of our country;

(iv) To fight relentlessly against Poverty, Ignorance, Disease, Colonialism, Neo-Colonialism, Imperialism and Apartheid;

(v) To plan Uganda’s Economic Development in such a way that the Government, through Parastatal Bodies, the Co-operative Movements, Private Companies, Individuals in Industry, Commerce and Agriculture, will effectively contribute to increased production to raise the standard of living in the Country;

(vi) To protect without discrimination based on race, colour, sect or religion every person lawfully living in Uganda and enable him to enjoy the fundamental rights and freedom of the individual, that is to say:

Life, Liberty, Security of the person and Protection of the Law; Freedom of Conscience, of expression and association; Protection of Privacy of his home, property and from deprivation of property without compensation.

(vii) To ensure that no citizen of Uganda will enjoy any special privilege, status or title by virtue of birth, descent or heredity;

(viii) To ensure that in the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms no person shall be allowed to prejudice the rights and freedoms of others and the interests of the State;

(ix) To support organisations, whether international or otherwise, whose aims, objects and aspirations are consistent with those of the Party;

(x) To do such other things that are necessary for the achievement of the aims, objects and aspirations of the Party.”

7. Republicanism in Uganda, just like the political Independence of Uganda, is now a reality, but the demand and struggle for Uhuru has no end. This is part of life and part of the inalienable right of man. It is also the cornerstone of progress and of the liberty of the individual, the basis of his prosperity and the hallmark of his full and effective participation in the affairs of his country. October 9, 1962, therefore, was the beginning of a much greater struggle of many dimensions along the road of full Uhuru. During the last seven years the U.P.C., by action and exhortation, has shown to the people of Uganda that it is wrong and deceitful to treat and regard the 9th October, 1962, as the end of the road; or the day on which the people of Uganda as a whole reached a stage in their development when all that remained was to divide the spoils on the principle of the survival of the fittest; or that the well-to-do, the educated and the feudal lords must and should be allowed to keep what they have, and get more if they can, without let or hindrance.

The Party has always made it clear to the people that the only acceptable and practical meaning of October 9th, 1962, is that the people of Uganda must move away from the ways and mental attitudes of the colonial past, move away from the hold of tribal and other forms of factionalism and the power of vested interests, and accept that the problems of poverty, development and nation-building can and must be tackled on the basis of one Country and one People. The Strategy laid down in this Charter aims at strengthening the fundamental objective of the Party. We do not believe that any citizen of Uganda, once freed of the mental attitudes of the colonial past, freed of the hold of tribal and other forms of factionalism, and freed of the power of vested interests, will find himself or herself at a disadvantage. On the contrary, it is our firm belief that such a citizen will gain that part of his/her freedom which has so far been in the hands of others, and which enabled those others to exploit for their own benefit not only the wealth of the country, but also the energy of our people, thereby arresting the mental development of our people.

8. Less than ten years ago the most prominent and explosive political issues which faced the people of Uganda had in reality, and in practical terms, nothing to do with the people as such. The issues were “The form of government suitable for an independent Uganda” and “Who was to be the Head of State on the achievement of Independence?” These issues were made to appear as of national importance, not because when solutions were found they would advance the lot of the common man, but because the feudalists, on account of their hold on the people, saw Independence as a threat to their then privileged positions and sought to make these positions synonymous with the interests of the common man. It cannot be denied that the then privileged positions of he feudalists were a barrier to the full and effective participation of the common man in the Government of Independent Uganda. The feudalists wanted to continue to rule as they used to before the coming of the British and they did not want the common man to have a say in the shaping of the destiny of an independent Uganda. That situation, however, is no longer with us Uganda is now a Republic. We hold it as the inalienable right of the people that they must be masters of their own destiny and not servants of this or that man; that they must, as citizens of an Independent Republic, express their views as freely as possible within the laws of their country, made, not in separate Parliaments, but in one Parliament in which the people as a whole have an equal say through their representatives.

9. The Republican status, therefore, has taken Uganda further towards the goal of full Uhuru. It must not be accepted, however, that our new status by itself is sufficient, or that it has removed exploitation and has brought full Uhuru. We realise that it is, by itself, an advance towards the goal of full Uhuru, but because we are also convinced that more has yet to be done, this Charter has been adopted, and its strategy is in our view a logical development from the fact that we have been moving away from the hold of feudal power since 1966. For so long as that feudal power was a factor in the politics and economy of Uganda it could not be disregarded. Thus the reason for this Charter. It must also be noted that in a society in which feudalism is an important and major political and economic factor, that society cannot escape being Rightist in its internal and external policies. With the removal of the feudal factor from our political and economic life, we need to do two things. First we must not allow the previous position of the feudalists to be filled by neo-feudalists. Secondly, we must move away from circumstances which may give birth to neo-feudalism or generate feudalistic mentality.

The move to the Left is the creation of a new political culture and a new way of life, whereby the people of Uganda as a whole – their welfare and their voice in the National Government and in other local authorities – are paramount. It is, therefore, both anti-feudalism and anti-capitalism.

10. In 1968, the U.P.C. Delegates’ Conference passed the following resolution on the important matter of nation-building:

(a) “NOTE with deep satisfaction the liquidation of anti-national and feudal forces, and the introduction of the Republican Constitution;

(b) THANK the leaders of the Party and the Government on initiating the revolution for economic, social and political justice;

(c) RECOGNISE that the most important task confronting the Party and the Government today is that of nation-building;

(d) RESOLVE that its entire human and material resources be committed in that task of nation-building;

(e) DIRECT that the National Council of the Party do examine ways and means for active involvement of all institutions, State and private, in joint endeavour with the Party to achieve and serve a nation united and one.”

11. We have no doubt whatsoever about the high priority which must be given to nation-building, and we are fully aware that there may be many people in this country who are either uninformed or misguided, who have not yet come to appreciate the importance of nation-building. We, therefore, consider it our responsibility to inform the uninformed, and to guide the misguided. It is also our responsibility to enlighten the people about the necessity of all the institutions in this country and the people as a whole being actively involved in the joint endeavour to serve the Nation.

12. When the U.P.C. proposes a policy or programme on behalf and for the benefit of the people of Uganda, the meaning of the phrase “people of Uganda” is always clear and definite. It is, One People under One Government in One Country. Accordingly, over the seven years of Independence the Party has indicated more than sufficiently that to belong to a clan, a tribe, a linguistic group, a region or a religion, is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage to any citizen of Uganda. The fact of being a citizen of Uganda, however, is a decided advantage which gives him fundamental rights and freedoms, and affords him full opportunity to exercise his social duties and obligations to his clan, tribe, region or religion, save as forbidden by laws passed by Parliament. These laws, as it is clearly stated in Principle 6 of the U.P.C. Aims and Objects, and in the Republican Constitution, are desirable so as to enable all citizens to enjoy their fundamental rights and freedoms without infringing upon the rights and freedoms of any other citizens to do the same.

13. In seven years of Independence we have experienced that the mass of our people are law-abiding citizens, who believe in the security of their families, stable conditions around their homes and throughout Uganda; who appreciate the need for expanding economic and social services, and who are desirous to work hard to improve their conditions of living and participate fully in political control of governmental institutions. This experience is in contrast to another, namely, the desire of foreign powers and institutions to choose leaders for us, to influence the policies of the Government of Uganda to the benefit of foreign interests, and to use the sons and daughters of Uganda to advance these interests. In our experience we have not found a single instance where foreign interests have sought to use the masses of the people to serve the interests of foreigners. We have, however, had abundant instances where the well-to-do, the educated and the feudal elements have been bought to serve the interests of foreigners. This kind of corruption of the intentions and frustrations of the wishes of the people may be tolerated in countries where nationhood has been firmly established, illiteracy is almost unknown and other factional issues do not play any important part in elections or in the formulation of Government policies. Uganda has not yet reached that stage of development; but even when we eventually reach that stage we will not tolerate, on principle, the corruption of the intentions and the frustration of the wishes of the people.

14. One of the most important considerations facing the people of Uganda, in the view of the U.P.C., is the future of the youth. We have only to look at the figures of all the young men and women in the Universities, in the Secondary Schools, in other institutes of learning and in the Primary Schools, to speak nothing of those who are at home, to realise that these are citizens of Uganda who are being prepared to shoulder responsibilities of consolidating further the political independence we now have, and to open more and more avenues which will lead the people of Uganda to real economic and social independence.

15. If, here in Uganda, we adopt the policy of developing our country and preparing our youth within the confines of tribal Governments, tribal Parliaments and traditions, and as tools of sectionalism and factionalism of any kind, we would neither be making a contribution to the African Revolution, nor would we be giving these young people what is within our power to give them – that is, the broadening of their horizon to look at the whole of Uganda and not just a part of it as the centre and platform of their operations. It is our duty and responsibility to accept these young people irrespective of the corner of Uganda which may be their birthplace. The whole of Uganda is their inheritance and we must not deny either all of them or a majority of them or even a minority of them, their heritage. They are growing in a different world – a world very different from the world in which those who faced the British when they first imposed colonial rule in Uganda lived. Young people are growing in a world which is becoming smaller and smaller, and for us to make that world even smaller by inducing them, directly or indirectly, to become exponents of tribal Herrenvolk principles, religious bigotry and fanaticism and feudalistic selfishness, and capitalistic rapacities would be to do a disservice that Africa will never forget, and a disservice that will certainly reduce the mental capacities of our young men and women. Uganda cannot afford to be so heartless to her youth.

16. It is not only the youth whom we must think about. Those who are grown up are equally important. Even the old and the infirm are important. The tribal confines and security are no longer strong enough to give them the requirements of modern times, or to protect their lives and property or to give that important recognition of human dignity and citizenship of a sovereign state.

17. We reiterate the fact that the struggle for Independence was not a struggle confined to people professing one religion. The colonial power heard voices from all corners of Uganda. The struggle, however, was not that different parts of Uganda should return to the days of tribal quarrels, disunity and wars but to move to the new era wherein all people of Uganda are one and the country is one, and to regain our dignity as human beings.

18. We recognise that ours is a society in transition. We want to bring out our considered assessment of the present situation as the starting point for our adoption of the move to the Left Strategy set out in this Charter. Uganda is a country which is already independent politically. It is that status that makes it the responsibility of the people of Uganda to shape their destiny. Before the 9th October, 1962, the people of Uganda did not have that responsibility or power. The sixty-nine years of colonial rule, during which an alien way of life was not only planted but also took root, resulted in the phenomenon of developing our human and material resources to bear the imprint of this factor in our society. What was planted in Uganda during the era of British protectorate appeared in the eyes and minds of our people as the final word in perfection regarding the development of our material resources and human relationship. Consequently, both before and after Independence, our people have been living in a society in which an alien way of life has been embedded. The result has been that most of our people do not look in to the country for ideas to make life better in Uganda, but always look elsewhere to import ideas which may be perfectly suitable in some other society but certainly unfitting in a society like ours. The more we pursue that course, the more we artificially organise out society, our material resources and human relationship, and the more we perpetuate a foreign way of life in our country.

19. We cannot afford to build two nations within the territorial boundaries of Uganda: one rich, educated, African in appearance but mentally foreign, and the other, which constitutes the majority of the population, poor and illiterate. We do not consider that all aspects of the African traditional life are acceptable as socialistic now. We do not, for instance, accept that belonging to a tribe should make a citizen a tool to be exploited by and used for the benefit of tribal leaders. Similarly, we do not accept that feudalism, though not inherently something peculiar to Africa or to Uganda, is a way of life which must not be disturbed because it has been in practice for centuries. With this background, we are convinced that Uganda has to choose between two alternatives. We either perpetuate what we inherited, in which case we will build on a most irrational system of production and distribution of wealth based on alien methods, or we adopt a programme of action based on realities of our country. The choice adopted in this Charter is the latter.. We must move away from the ways of the past to the avenues of reality, and reject travelling along a road where the signpost reads: “Right of admittance is belief in the survival of the fittest.” To us, every citizen of Uganda must survive and we are convinced that Uganda has to move to the Left as a unit. Conditions must be created to enable the fruits of Independence to reach each and every citizen without some citizens enjoying privileged positions or living on the sweat of their fellow citizens.

20. The emergence and growth of a privileged group in our society, together with the open possibilities of the group assuming the powers of the feudal elements, are not matters of theory and cannot be disregarded with a waive of the hand. Nor should the same be looked at from a doctrinaire approach. It is for this reason that in this Charter we do not intend to play with words, even if those words have meanings, such as “Capitalism” or “Communism”. We are convinced that from the standpoint of our history, not only our educational system inherited from pre-Independence days, but also the attitudes to modern commerce and industry and the position of a person in authority, in or outside Government are creating a gap between the well-to-do on the one hand and the mass of people on the other. As the years go by, this gap will become wider and wider. The move to the Left Strategy of this Charter aims at bridging the gap and arresting this development.

21. We identify two circumstances in which the emergence of a privileged class can find comfort and growth. First, there is our education system which aims at producing citizens whose attitude to the uneducated and to their way of life leads them to think of themselves as the masters and the uneducated as their servants. Secondly, the opportunities for self-employment in modern commerce and industry and to gain employment in Government and in other sectors of the economy are mainly open to the educated few; but instead of these educated few doing everything possible within their powers for the less educated, a tendency is developing where whoever is in business or in Government looks to his immediate family and not to the country as a whole in opening these opportunities. The existence of these circumstances could lead to actual situations of corruption, nepotism and abuse of responsibility. It is unrealistic for anyone to believe that the answer to such situations lies in the strict application of the laws. Much as the laws might assist in preventing such crimes being committed against the nation, it is our view that the answer lies in tackling the roots of the problems, namely to generate a new attitude to life and to wealth, and new attitudes in exercising responsibilities. Our country is fortunate in that these problems have not taken deep roots and the crimes which they generate and the crimes which they generate are universally condemned by the society. If we do not take initial effective measures to change the course of events at this stage of our history, it may be too late to avoid violence in future years. It is because we are convinced that this is the right moment to re-orientate our course that we have adopted the measures set out in the move to the Left Strategy of this Charter.

22. The ordinary citizen of Uganda associates economic development of this country with a rise in his own private real income. This income may accrue to him from self-employment, i.e., farming, fishing, cattle-keeping, or paid employment. What is of crucial importance to the ordinary citizen is that Government should provide him with certain social services free and that his income should rise faster than the cost of living, so that he can afford more goods and services for his own use. But there are also three other major dimensions of economic development which must concern our Government. These are the distribution of the national income, the structure of the economy and the creation of institutions conducive to further development and consistent with the Socialist Strategy outlined in this Charter.

23. Let us begin with the examination of the distribution of income in our country. It is obvious that for development to take place there should be a rise in the average income per head (per capita income). This can only occur if the rate of growth of national income exceeds the rate of population growth. For this reason our Government must always place great emphasis on the fast rate of growth of the economy and the national income. Indeed, increased production and wealth is one of the three major goals of the current Plan (“Work for Progress”) 1966-71. We are fully convinced that this emphasis is not misplaced, since raising the standard of living of the Common Man in Uganda must be the major aim of our Government. It is possible, however, for the overall rate of growth to rise without affecting large masses of the population. This is a danger that we must guard against. We must not either because of inertia, corruption or academic love for the principle of the theory of free enterprise, fail to take bold corrective measures against this danger.

24. There is also the danger that economic development could be unevenly distributed as between regions of the country. The fact is that there is no automatic mechanism within our economic system to ensure an equitable distribution of the national income among persons, groups of persons or regions. We need only to stretch our eyes not to the distant future but to the years immediately ahead of us, taking into account the fact of our present expanding economy, to recognise that if no new strategy is adopted now, inequalities in the distribution of income will change dramatically the status of millions of our people, and might result in our having two nations – one fabulously rich and living on the sweat of the other, and the other living in abject poverty – both living in one country. In such a situation political power will be in the hands of the rich and the maximum the Government will do for the poor will be paternalism, where the lot of the masses will be not only to serve the well-to-do, but to be thankful on their knees when opportunity arises to eat the crumbs from the high table.

25. The nature of our economy today is such that the resources are not allocated by a central authority. The reality of the situation is that allocation of resources in Uganda today is directly proportionate to the distribution of income. The practical fact which emerges from this can be illustrated in this way. If 5 per cent. of the population receive, say, 50 per cent. of the national income among them, this small minority possesses the power to command at least half of the productive resources of the country. With so much wealth at their disposal their consumption habits will affect the whole economy. As it happens, these habits will be characterised by the consumption of luxurious goods not produced in the country but imported from outside, or produced in the country at extremely high cost. If the goods have to be imported then the bulk of the population must produce for export in order to pay for the import of such luxurious goods. Our argument for a change to make it impossible for such a situation to develop as a feature of Uganda, is that the consumption habits of the very rich not only impinge directly on the disposal of one of the very important resources of the country, namely foreign exchange, but also constitute a negation of the real meaning of our Independence. The crucial point here is that inequitable distribution of income leads directly to non-development of resources which could cater for the consumption needs of the poor, since the masses cannot afford to pay for the goods which would be produced, and instead the economy becomes dependent on exports of primary commodities in order to pay for imports of luxurious goods for the rich. The end result is a constant problem of unfavourable balance of payments and external debts, and a neglect of the welfare of the Common Man.

26. We must examine the argument in another way. A redistribution of income which puts more purchasing power in the hands of the Common Man, who constitutes the greatest proportion of the population, would give an impetus to the development of local industries. This is because the needs of the masses are unlikely to be of the luxurious type. As the mass of the people of Uganda begin to acquire higher and higher incomes, they would in all probability acquire more and more goods produced in their country; but to open the door only to the rich to buy at high prices any quantity of imported goods and locally produced goods at high costs, which put them beyond the means of the Common Man, is to disregard the existence of the mass of the population or to acknowledge their servitude to the rich.

27. The heart of the Move to the Left can be simply stated. It is both political and economic. It is the basic belief of the Uganda Peoples’ Congress that political power must be vested in the majority of the people and not the minority. It is also the fundamental belief of the Uganda Peoples’ Congress that economic power should be vested in the majority and not in the minority, as is the case at present. It is therefore, our firm resolution that political and economic power must be vested in the majority.

28. The structure of Uganda’s economy is characterised by: an excessive dependence on agriculture as a source of income, employment and foreign exchange; a heavy dependence on exports based on two major export crops; heavy dependence on imports, particularly of manufactured products; and the limited participation of Ugandans in the modern industrial and commercial sectors of the economy. It has therefore been the policy of the Party to diversify the economy to make it less dependent of foreign trade, to promote the participation of citizens in all sectors of the economy, and the Move to the Left is intended to intensify these efforts through collective ownership, viz. Co-operatives and state enterprises.

29. Economic development demands, among other things, capital (money). We recognise that a country cannot depend upon capital from outside because this, apart from being unpredictable, is subject to variation by various factors and has always got strings attached to it. We are convinced from experience that this country is capable of generating sufficient capital out of the savings of all the citizens. We therefore propose that a suitable means where savings of the citizens can be effectively tapped and correctly channelled into further economic development should be introduced.

30. To this effect we propose that the system be based on the present basis of calculation upon which wage-earners pay contribution of a fraction of their earnings into the Social Security Fund. The basis of the calculation of that part of the income of the wage-earners that goes into contributions to the National Social Security Scheme should apply proportionately to the income earned by all other persons, either by way of salary or other method of determinable income. With the exception of the wage-earner who is already required by law to make contributions to the National Social Security Scheme, all other persons will either pa direct or have it deducted and paid into an approved scheme.

31. The present banking institutions cater mainly for the needs of commerce and industry. It is not possible for the peasants, who constitute the majority of our population, to advance their lot through financial assistance in the form of loans from these commercial banks. Even if they were to do so, they would spend a substantial part of it, if not their entire income, in paying back these loans. It is, therefore, imperative that a new banking system, to be known as the Co-operative Bank, be established to cater solely for the peasants who are members of the Co-operative Unions. The policy of such a Bank should include a provision to the effect that the Co-operative Union of the person applying for a loan from the Bank gives a guarantee and takes over administration of the repayment of the loan, and that the loan in the majority of cases should be given in relation to what the applicant is already doing.

32. We reiterate the fact that there can be no investment unless somebody first makes a corresponding saving. This applies equally to local and overseas investment.

(a) With regard to local investment we have now proposed a scheme for compulsory saving in a number of schemes, and the establishment of Co-operative Banks.

(b) With regard to foreign investment we fully realise that foreign investors want guarantees, and we consider that the Foreign Investment (Protection) Act covers this adequately and generously. Much as we appreciate the need to attract foreign investment, we are fully convinced that the economic future of this country depends on local capital formation and local savings and investment.

33. In future we would wish to see foreign investments coming into Uganda under the Foreign Investment (Protection) Act, engaging in priority projects and not projects decided solely on the basis of profitability. Similarly, local investments should be controlled in such a way that they are made in priority projects determined by the needs of the economic development of the country.

34. In our Move to the Left Strategy, we affirm that the guiding economic principle will be that the means of production and distribution must be in the hands of the people as a whole. The fulfilment of this principle may involve nationalisation of enterprises privately owned.

35. The issue of nationalisation has already been determined and therefore it is a settled matter. It was in the 1962 Constitution, as it is in the republican Constitution of 1967. Therefore no citizen or person in private enterprise should entertain the idea that the Government of Uganda cannot, whenever it is desirable in the interests of the people, nationalise any or all privately owned enterprises, mailo and freehold land and all productive assets or property, at any time, for the benefit of the people. The Party therefore directs the Government to work along these lines.

36. In this Charter we lay emphasis first on the people being given massive education in operating and establishing institutions controlled, not by individuals, but by the people collectively. This massive education should aim at re-orientating the attitudes of the people towards co-operation in the management of economic institutions, and away from individual and private enrichment. We therefore direct the Government to give education to the people to acquire new attitudes in the management of our economy where collective exploitation of our resources to the benefit of all will take the place of individual and private enterprise aimed at enriching a few.

37. We must move in accordance with the principles of democracy. That is the way that brings human progress. Ideas must be generated and sifted, and citizens – educated or not – must be able to think for themselves, learn to work together, and to participate in the processes of governing themselves.

38. The Move to the Left involves government by discussion. This Charter and the principles enunciated herein should be widely disseminated through mass media of communication, and discussed by study groups and individuals all over the country.

39. Principles are a good thing but they are no substitute for hard work. The success of the Charter demands full commitment of leaders to its realisation, acceptance by the mass of the population, and hard work by all.

40. The adoption of the Charter provides an opportunity to the Common Man for the realisation of the full fruits of his labour and of social justice.

Sir Edward was not only a British trained military officer, but was an instructor himself in the Grenadier Guards


On 30th Nov 1953, when the Governor Sir Andrew Cohen surmoned Sir Edward Muteesa to Government House in Entebbe, after Sir Edward refused to budge from the numerous threats made towards him, Sir Cohen handed him the deportation order. Without looking at it, Sir Edward passed it over to his Katikkiro, Owek. Paulo Kavuma, and kept on staring at the Governor. He (Sir Edward) just calmly asked them, “Does this mean that I am under arrest?” The Governor hissed out, “Yes”. Two white constables then walked in to take away the Kabaka. He then allowed them to walk him out of the office. Upon reaching outside, his deputy ADC, Robert Ntambi (RIP) being concerned over the safety of his Kabaka asked him, “Ssebo, nkube?”, meaning “Sir, should I shoot the bastards?” Sir Edward being the Royal and British trained military personnel he was, replied calmly with wisdom and guidance, “Tokuba, baleke” meaning “Just let the poor souls be!”

Please note that Sir Edward himself was armed with a revolver which he later handed over to the accompanying British officer in the aeroplane when they were already airborne, and could have done a Terrance Hill to those two poor souls, but he couldn’t kill an innocent man.

Sir Edward was not only a British trained military officer, but was an instructor himself in the Grenadier Guards. As you might guess, British Army is not some ‘’taka taka’ African army where some officer might be made an instructor simply because of some top connections. Sir Edward was worthy his pips and medals. Sir Edward though still a minor, had the advantage of receiving lectures from his father; the late Sir Daudi Chwa II. It was not just by chance that he was made the 35th Kabaka of Buganda

I live by the truth, and that is part of the true history of our kingdom Buganda.Katikkiro of Obwakabaka bw’e Buganda brought light not only to Buganda, but to the rest of Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda! Thanks to Buganda’s Katikkiro Kawalya, not only Buganda is enjoying NWSC services, but the whole of Ugandan towns. Thanks to Buganda’s Katikkiro Mukasa, not only Buganda is enjoying the benefits of Islam and Christianity, but the whole of Uganda and the region including Rwanda, Burundi and Boga-Zaire (East DRC). Buganda is a key player in the development of our Region, from establishing religion, nagging the British with independence to introducing electricity and piped water and sewerage system!

‘I remember even when the then Katikkiro of Buganda, owek. Michael Kawalya, proposed to the British Protectorate government to introduce a piped water grid system and hydro electricity in the country, a great section of the population threatened to stone him to ‘death’. They asked him whether the lake Nnalubaale and the various brooks and streams in Buganda had run dry. All the masses wanted (they told him) was Independence from the Lukokobe – Muzungu!’

You have well heard of the Kiganda saying that; “Okwogera ennyo, ssi kuzza Lubaale!” In other words, even if you play and dance TWIST, it won’t help you to bring back the Bazungu wish of stiffling Buganda and the region!

The problems between Bazungu (this includes Indians and British citizens who were living in East Africa at the time) and Baganda might have started with Sir Hesketh Bell, but th…is does not erase the history that as per the 1894 and 1900 Agreements, Buganda was treated as a Sovereign State, and that is why Buganda and later Uganda was NEVER a Colony! Amazima gakaawa but non-Baganda should appreciate Buganda’s role in preventing their regions from becoming a colony, as was the case with Kenya and Tanzania! I shall repeat once more, Buganda has perfected the art of negotiating since time immemorial, that is why the Arabs and British explorers cum traders found it in an asdvanced stage, because Baganda knew the value of negotiating! Even the wars that were fought by Buganda and her neighbours, negotiations were not ruled out

Simply because of Olunyoomonyoomo lwa Bazungu that was evident with the coming of Hesketh Bell on the scene, we are not going to accept our history to be re-written. Buganda was a Sovereign State while other regions looked on, but just like a good teacher who doesn’t wish to see part of the class advancing while the rest is lagging behind, Buganda tried to move in step with the rest of the regions, at her expense. Otherwise we would have got our independence in the 1930s. Ever heard of the Buganda organisation called Bataka Union – BU, that was headed by a one Ssemakula Mulumba? Those men were not jokers!

You very well know that in the past, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda have enjoyed a long history of co-operation under successive kingdom and regional integration arrangements. Kingdom in that Bunyoro-Kitara and Buganda kingdoms were trade partners way deep up to Karagwe in Tanzania and then westwards. With the negotiations between the British and Buganda that brought about the Uganda (Buganda) British Protectorate in 1894 and the Buganda Agreement of 1900, more developmental initiatives were introduced. These have included the Customs Union between Kenya and Uganda in 1917, which the then Tanganyika later joined in 1927; the East African High Commission (1948-1961); the East African Common Services Organisation (1961-1967) which was tasked with pst office, railways, airways, ports and harbours; and research. The East African Community was formed later in 1967 and lasted until 1977.

The East African High Commission sparked off what was later to become the 1953-55 Buganda Crisis. Why? Because the British in their arrogance formed it without consulting Buganda thru its Great Lukiiko in Mmengo, as per the Agreements in place. Buganda just learnt about it through the media, and to add salt to injury, this son of a Briton called Oliver Lyttelton announces at an exclusive party tha was held at the East Africa House how Britain is going to federate the three East African Countries just like they had done with Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland (Malawi). The rest is history, but bottom line: Buganda affairs before were in the Foreign Office okutuusa abalabe baffe lwe baatukwatirwa obuggya! And even then, if you persist on the disinformation, the demand for Buganda to be returned to the British Foreign Office shows the foresightedness of our forefathers and the kingdom as a whole. Hate it or love it, if it weren’t for Buganda negotiators, Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania would now be like Zimbabwe or South Africa! The choice is yours. Please, give the Devil his due!!!

OWEK.ROBERT NVIRI
UAH MEMBER

——————————————————————————–
1/7 If you chanced to access a Top Secret memorandum C. (53) 324 written by the British Secretary of State (Minister) for the colonies to the British cabinet on 18th November 1953, you would learn that HM EF Mutesa II had very few options when he was summoned by Andrew Cohen for interview.

2/7 The governor (Cohen) already had instructions to ensure that Kabaka Mutesa complied with instructions to leve the country. The memorandum stated that, “If the Kabaka refuses to come to this country to see me then I propose to authorize the Governor to put into operation the plan described in paragraph 6 above.”

3/7 Para 6 of the memorandum was a detailed military plan (referred to by Secretary Lyttleton as “extreme action”) that was supposed to be executed from the day of the Kabaka Mutesa/Governor Cohen meeting (30.11.1953) to 8.12.1953.

4/7 Note that on 16th November 1953 4th Battalion K.A.R started moving back to Jinja from Kenya ready for military operations in Buganda “in support of the police” to carry out what the memorandum called a coup d’etat had the Kabaka tried to

“…embark on an open trial of strength with Her Majesty’s Government.”

5/7 That “Top Secret” memorandum in part states that, “General Erskine has agreed to make available one battalion of the King’s African Rifles which is now moving into Uganda ostensibly as a routine transfer. He has also agreed to have a reserve battalion on standing by at three days’ notice but if this or any further reinforcements were called upon he might have to ask additional assistance from the United Kingdom.”

6/7 So then, Kabaka Mutesa was alot wiser than you can possibly imagine, by avoiding any childish action of the type that you call “Terrance Hill”. Had he tried, he would probably have been subjected to an emotional experience that would have denied him the chance to see 1966, itself a continuation of the 1953 intransigence.

7/7 The difference between 1966 and 1953 was, that Governor Cohen had alot more manoeuvrability than AM Obote, otherwise the basic plan was the same. Cohen had plan A and B. Plan A worked and that saved the day. AM had only Plan A, namely, Cohen’s Plan B, a Zero sum game.
L/Cpl (rtd) Otto Patrick

The whole notion of ‘tax-payer’ is completely out of place in Uganda


The whole notion of ‘tax-payer’ is completely out of place in Uganda.The population of Uganda has no solid stake in the management of public affairs because it lives outside that domain: 85% peasants, dying at 45 years of age, living in a non-monetary sector, in the rural countryside, untaxable because they do not produce any surplus to be taxed, about 50% of them are illiterate, 50.2% 15 years and below, wearing nappies, the highest in the world….that is not the kind of population that takes its government to task. Never!

As you know Ugandans have no fiscal contract with their politicians. If you do not pay the piper, you cannot call the tune.If you look at the 1,000 top tax payers in Uganda, you will find that the top two, MTN and Shell BP pay 12% of all the taxes. The top 10 pay 28% of all the taxes. And those top 10 are petrol vendors (Caltex, Total, Shell), mobile phone vendors, soft drinks and beer makers (Century bottling, Uganda breweries, Nile breweres), cigarette makers (BAT)…all foreign. No real production, no indigenous stake holder on how public affairs/finance should be managed. The other day graduated tax was scrapped…So?

The ‘donors’ contribute up to 53% of all recurrent expenditures. Th so called tax payer is in Brussels and Paris, London and Stockholm, Amsterdam and Copenhagen. More than 80% of the population live outside the monetary sector…peasants. So, which tax payer? To whom, then, are your politicians accountable?

That is why I always wonder what we mean on this forum (and indeed in Uganda) when we keep talking of the lack of democracy, accountability etc. In a country where there is no fiscal contract between the political class and the population as we have in Uganda, there can never be a social contract. Democracy, accountability, ‘good governance’: all that is rubbish. The content of democracy is a fiscal contract.

We need to come to grips with the real content of democracy. Very clearly, in Uganda, there is no foundation or basis for democracy….a cabinet of 500 is feasible.

Unless the country is radically shaken up, to transform the socioeconomic basis in the direction of making the political class dependent on the majority of the population, for get about democracy, keep mum about the ‘tax payer’.

That aid is unearned income and you know what unearned income does. If government was depending on mony deducted from 20 million Ugandas wage earners, it wold think twice before squandering it. It would be someone’s sweat and they would demand for accountability. But who in Uganda identifies with ‘donor’ aid as his money? If we do not come to grips with the relationship between paying tax and governmental accountability, then we shall keep fooling ourselves for ever with democracy for ever.

That is why I always insist that we need to proletarianise the population-urgently-create wage earners, get rid of the passive peasant class. A population that is largely wage-earners or proletariat is a population that you do not foll around with. The impunity of our political class now is a logical consequence of the fact that the country is largely peasant. That is why some of them are interested in preserving that passive class that will vote for them just because of a piece of soap. A wage labourer will tell you not to insult him by bribing him with money he contributed as PAYE or income tax.
What tax do the peasants pay?

We know that Uganda was broke right from the cradle: independence was on 9 oct 1962, 24 hours later, on 10 oct 1962 there was no money to finance the return of the colonial administrators to London. The first structural adjustment facility was arranged there and then (what ever structures there were to adjust on day one). If AM Obote had asked for grants to finance his ‘public spending’ (whatever that means) instead of expropriating foreign multinationals, he would probably have lived longer and may be succumbed to internal contradictions.


L/Cpl (rtd) Otto Patrick

MUSEVENI IS THE BIGGEST LAND OWNER IN UGANDA


LAND4The market for land collapsed long ago. And it collapsed because the govt messed up with the incentive structures. Actually several things are happening simultaneously in the land sector. The land bill Act of 1998 or 1997 offered full insurance to land squatters/bibanja holders/and so called bonafide land tenants (read land grabbers). I equate land to insurance. Once the laws was passed things fell a part literally. There has never been order/certainity in the land sector ever since. I invite you to wonder why it is that insurance firms discriminate on the basis of age, gender, and even race.

For some strange/stupid reason the cabinet of Uganda wanted to treat every one in the land sector the same. Actually tenants were treated better than mailo land owners which in the insurance industry would be like treating young male better than middle aged women drivers. In other words, the land bill should have taken into consideration quality. Quality of land/location/size etc but also quality in terms of ownership.

To privilege the tenant/bonafide tenant over the mailo land owner was the biggest mistake the bill made. It may be the case that tenant/bibanja holders have groups that represent them but not mailo land owners because the regime hates them even as the big men in the regime have become the largest land holders in Uganda not by birth, but through land grabbing, okay blackmail purchases. Anyone who cares to know knows that the President Museveni is now the largest land holder in Uganda (that is why he and the twatera embuddu clique eschewed efficient tools such as land taxation). The consequences are there for all to see: the opposite has happened to the land sector. The order the bill wanted to introduce is now no more. Truth of the matter is tat the land sector is characterized by chaos and uncertainty.

That chaos and uncertainty has led to the second problem: multiple land titles. Mailo land owners have the original copy which by law-gazette notice -has never been annulled. The crooks with the right connections have duplicate copies. Mark you, the ministry of lands is a den of thieves who create land titles for the NRMO crowd. under such an environment, land buyers can never be sure that the land they are buying belongs to the person selling it in the first place. That is where the lemon problem comes in.

What you saw the IGP doing is the equivalent of what buyers of second hand vehicles in the West do: demand a certificate from govt licensed garage to verify that indeed the car is not a lemon. It is costly. With the crime levels in Uganda, the IGP is now in the business of verifying land titles. How did things get to that level?

Things will get worse not better. I suspect that as Kony terrorized parts of northern Uganda, some ‘bonafide’ tenants may have taken over people’s land. Mark you the Land Act does not take such developments into consideration. If someone takes over your land and can prove that they have been on that land since 1986 (notice the cut off year) for 10 years, they can invoke the law to protect them.

Basically, the Land Act assumes that if you let -never mind whether you were aware or not-someone on your land for 10, you are deemed to have slept on your rights and therefore out of luck. The bonafide tenants has all the rights to be issued land titles.

The insight I want to emphasize on you is that if NRMO really wanted to create efficient land use in Uganda, BUT it should have used taxation. All holders of mailo land holders/other forms of land would be subject to a land tax. It would have served multiple goals. a) it is more efficient than the current land Act. b) there would be no such uncertainty with regards to land titles and therefore minimal chaos in the land sector. C) It would have been more equitable in the end. The logic is that you tax heavily something you do not like(NRMO hates land owner).. Those unable to pay the tax on the expansive land would sell to return portions they can afford to pay the tax on. It is possible the govt could have generated bilions in taxes since land can’t be hidden to vade taxes.. I told why taxation was not considered: it would hit the new kids on the land block.

As Justice Wendel Holmes famously observed, taxes is what people pay for civilization. YKM wanted to avoid land taxes for personal reasons and created the current chaos in the land sector. Similarly, he hoodwinked Ugandans when he abolished the only taxes most people paid so today they have no voice. How can Ugandans complain that YKM is hiring only his relatives when they pay no taxes? If they want that voice they have no choice but pay taxes.

Let the embattled land holders counter YKM’s land reform with a proposal to be taxed instead on their land holders. NRMO would then have to explain why a revenue starved nation would leave money on the table. As they say kyoyagala kikusezza (sp)/you pay dearly for what you treasure. Imagine if the land holders were to call a national press conference and announce that they are willing to be taxed on their land holdings. Things would interesting would they?

This the what Akerlof talked about. the land market is full of lemons hence the uncertainty. No one can be certain of the land title they hold. It has now become so costly to a level where the IGP checks land titles. The picture of IGP with scared Katoto checking land titles said it all: the land market is Uganda is no more. that is the uncertainty Akerlof talked about. The govt offices are responsible for the lemon business. No one can be sure of the land titles they hold. Former Finances ministers are not pared and so is NSSF. I will summarize the Akerlof paper with concrete Ugandan examples very soon.

Byebyo.

WBK

There has actually never existed anything such as 9,000 sq miles claimed by the Buganda kingdom!


Folks,
There has actually never existed anything such as 9,000 sq miles claimed by the Buganda kingdom! That figure was an estimate made by H Johnston committee in 1900, as land that was to be under the charge of the central government after allocations were made to other interests (Royals, churches, chiefs etc).

They made the estimate basing on the assumption that Buganda land was 19,600 sq miles, pending confirmation by a survey. They further noted that if after the survey, Buganda land was found to be less that estimate, the deficiency would be deducted from the 9,000 allocated to government.

The Survey took place in 1936 and it confirmed that actual land was 16,138 sq miles, i.e., right from go, the Johnston estimate was deficient by 3,462 sq miles. According to Article 15 of the 1900 agreement which still stands, that deficiency was to be immediately deducted from the 9,000. That left 5,538 sq miles. In other words, by the time of the allocation, government gave itself ‘air’ to the tune of 3,462 sq miles: Akenda, no! Nkumi ttaano, yes!

So, when in 2012 someone, a member of the educated elite, comes around to still demand for Akenda, in spite of those realities, and when you alert him of those facts he calls you a ‘Buganda hater’, and packs Youtube with songs, ‘Akaalo kaffe’ etc etc, then you know that the country is in very, very serious problems, and faces great dangers in future.

Besides the deficiency resulting from the overestimate, 667 sq miles of the inflated Akenda (now really 5,538) was in fact in Buyaga and Bugangaizi. The 1964 referendum automatically removed that from Buganda and reverted it to Bunyoro. Therefore, anyone demanding for Akenda now, not only disregards the 1936 survey but also disregards the meaning of the 1964 referendum. Why should anybody put themselves in that kind of position? Now, as you see on this forum, when someone just reminds colleagues of those realities, they are straight away branded as a ‘Buganda hater’. What is wrong with us?

I am actually writing a PhD on Post-Mwanga Baganda kings. The title is:

‘The Pathologies of Power and Powerlessness: Buganda Monarchs after the reign of Ssekabaka Daniel Basammula Butagali Mwanga II’

Anyhow, in a world where people make such undertakings as research, it becomes pitiable for the mediaeval individual who looks at his tribe as his personal property…..And how do you know that I am not a Muganda?

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

WHY WAS A TRAITOR LAWYER CHOOSEN TO BECOME THE TOP GOVERNMENT LAWYER, OF ALL PEOPLE


Peter Nyombi is a Ugandan lawyer and politician. He is the current Attorney General in the Ugandan Cabinet. He was appointed to that position on 27 May 2011

Peter Nyombi is a Ugandan lawyer and politician. He is the current Attorney
General in the Ugandan Cabinet. He was appointed to that position on 27 May
2011

In the early 1980′s, a young State Attorney called Nyombi made ‘miracles’ by betraying the state he was supposed to represent…30 years later, the man is the same:

Recap:
1. When A.M.Obote was MoF under President Obote, Foreign exchange was hard to procure. The signature of the MoF was needed.
2. A certain Asian [name withheld] procured forex with a forged Obote’s signature and got the dollars from BoU. It was a scandal of proportions. The Asian escaped to Nairobi, out of the reach of the law, seemingly.

3. The Special Branch [of The Uganda Police] swung into action and lured the Asian back from Nairobi. He was ‘nabbed’ at /near ‘Tank Hill’ [at Reste Coner to be exact] by the CID and soon aligned before Court. Chosen to represent the State of Uganda was one young lawyer, Nyombi.

4. Before Court at Mmengo, facts were presented on file and the culprit was to be sent to Luzira but he asked for bail. When the State was asked whether bail was appropriate, Mr. Nyombi answer, “The State does not object to Mr…’s bail. The culprit was released, jumped bail and never appeared again. At the CID and the the Attorney General’s chambers, there was shock

5. The instruction to Nyombi had been, “No bail under any condition since this man had been extracted from Kenya with difficulty….”.

6. The head of CID then, One Kanywamusayi confronted Nyombi, who had no explanation.”You are a fake lawyer and thief’, cried the CID BOSS. Rumour had it then that Nyombi had been seen in some corners with the agents of the culprit some days before the court date. Interestingly, this betrayal of his institution and country is known by all contemporaries of Nyombi, and even PM Mbabazi should be aware, having been his colleague and the AG’s chamber before.

7. Mother of all questions: WHY WAS A TRAITOR LAWYER CHOSEN TO BECOME THE TOP GOVERNMENT LAWYER, OF AL PEOPLE. Nyombi was born and grew up a ‘fraud’. He should never have been trusted.

So, when he decided to side with a Political party in the case of the four NRM MP rebels against the State he represents, Nyombi should not surprise anybody. It is in his blood.

Chris Muwanga,
Nakasero,
Kampala.

Beti Kamya Doesn’t agree with the ruling made by Kadaga on NRM rebel MPs


As a student of the Constitution of Uganda (hereafter to be called The Constitution) and believer in organized (multiparty) as opposed to disorganised (individual merit) politics, I am provoked to respond to Prof Oloka Onyango’s opinion titled “NRM Wrong on Speaker” published in The New Vision of 8 May, 2013.

Quoting the Constitution extensively, Prof Onyango defends Speaker Kadaga’s ruling on the (no)relationship between MPs and political parties that sponsor them, once in Parliament. In my view, his powerful arguments sound like a skilled defense lawyer’s, than an academic analyzing the Constitution.

Article 1 of the Constitution says “All power belongs to the people who shall exercise their sovereignty in accordance with this Constitution”. Article 1(4) mandates the people to exercise their will on HOW they wish to be governed through referenda, hence, there is only one way in which the people can express their will on HOW they wish to be governed, i.e. through referenda.

Through the 2005 referendum, the people chose to be governed under the multiparty system, making multiparty democracy the apex principle of governance in Uganda, anything less being contemptuous of the people’s will.

In a multiparty system, people who subscribe to political parties are bound by the respective parties’ constitutions and rules, duly registered under appropriate laws. Those who do not wish to be regulated by parties do not join them, and seek election as independents. One cannot be sponsored by a party, then once in parliament, claim the benefits of independents, because you cannot eat your cake and have it.

It was in cognizant of this that Article 83(3) provides for recall of MPs by the electorate only during the Movement System where MPs get elected on individual merit, with accountability only to the electorate, so the electorate regulates them directly. It is in the same spirit that Article 83(g) requires an MP who “leaves the political party for which s(he) stood as a candidate to vacate the seat….” and seek fresh mandate because the electorate would have elected the MP knowing her / his political ideology, party manifesto and team-mates.

When the MP “leaves” her/his party, regardless of the exit method, the electorate are left with no clear knowledge of whom they are dealing with.

Article 83(g) is an entitlement of the electorate for the MP to redefine her/himself so that they know who they are dealing with. It is also a source of accountability to the electorate, who should not be taken for granted, because they know exactly whom they originally sent to Parliament. The much acclaimed “speaking for the people” by the rebel MPs is a fallacy because the people decided through the 2005 referendum that anybody wishing to speak for them must do so under the multiparty system, and under Article 255(3), “…. the results (of the referendum) shall be binding on all organs (including parliament) and agencies of the State, and on all persons (including the Speaker) and organizations in Uganda”.

Once the People speak (through referenda), their will must be reflected through laws, practices and policies that govern organs, organizations and individuals. The challenge at hand is to strengthen internal party democracy in order to derive inhouse consensus, instead of destroying multipartism when MPs fight their parties under the patronage of parliament.

I find it hard to concur with Prof Onyango (and Speaker Kadaga’s) insinuation that the Constitution of Uganda feigns ignorance of political parties’ interests in Parliament and the need to protect them or deems them irrelevant and inconsequential, in a multiparty dispensation.

Beti Kamya-Turwomwe

President

Uganda Federal Alliance

E mail: ufapresident@gmail.com

Tel: 0783 438 201

1980 ELECTIONS:’UNOPPOSED” IS THE VOCABULARY OF UPC ELECTORAL WICKEDNESS


1/9 I see some UPC supporters taunting DP for not ‘filing’ candidates during the 1980 elections: typical riggers’ lingo. File candidates! In fact, UPC had ‘filed’ 43 candidates, but to their disappointment, they managed to get 17 “unopposed” giving them a headstart that was further reinforced by Legal Notice No. 10….and of course they refer why other parties did not take UPC to courts of law and they do not tell us why Justice W Wambuzi was summarily sacked a few days before polling day and replaced with George Masika, a card-carrying UPC diehard…and the sacking of 14 non-UPC District Commissioners etc. Let me run you through how UPC “files” candidates:

2/9 Arua: All five DP candidates arrived in time for nomination. The electoral commission had assured all parties that several requirements had been waived due to the prevailing war situation in Arua, Moyo and Nebbi. Almost from nowhere, AM Obote announced on radio that UPC in Arua had no opposition and they were there-and-then declared elected unopposed. The waiving of the requirements was a trap laid for the DP. While the DP candidates took the Electoral Commission for their word, the same commission tipped the UPC to have all documents in place. Although the Arua DP candidates were disqualified fraudulently for non-possession of income tax documents, the UPC candidate for Masaka North, who was unable to secure a nomination on similar grounds was later “nominated”, 36 hours to polling day on 8 December 1980, two weeks after the actual nomination day.

3/9 Moyo: The DP candidate, Engineer Sam Drale was detained by UNLAs some five miles before he reached the DC’s office. He was kept in the Army barracks and released at 1930, after the nominations had ended. The reason for detaining him was that he was plotting to overthrow the Military commission government.

4/9 Mbale: DP candidate Haji Sulaiman Masaba Mbale West constituency was declared nominated at noon on the day. The DC then recalled him with allegations that some of his nomination documents were forged. The DP leaders in Mbale strongly objected to the DC’s claims and the DC chickened out of his scheme.

5/9 Soroti: The DP candidate, Mr Michael Etatau (Soroti Central) was declared nominated at noon, given a certificate of proof of nomination, later he was put at gun point by UNLA personnel and caused to surrender the certificate and ordered to report to the DC. The DC then taught Mr Etatau that from that day onwards, he (Mr Etatau) did not know how to speak English and therefore his nomination was invalid. Elsewhere, DP candidate Mr Raymond Ekadu was nominated, given a certificate but later the certificate was confiscated from him by the Returning Officer on grounds that Mr Ekadu had not resigned from public service, which was in fact not the case. Even if it had been, once nomination is completed, challenges can only arise after the general election has been held.

6/9 Bundibugyo: The DP candidate arrived at the DC’s office, he was ordered to wait for 2 hours and there after tadvised that he was too late.

7/9 Kasese: Nomination papers of all three DP candidates were accepted, notified to the electoral commission in a letter dated 27th November 1980 (which I have seen), and duly gazetted on 5 December 1980. Then on 8 December, 2 weeks after nomination, and 36 hours before polling began, Radio Uganda announced that EC had declared the nomination of those three DP candidates invalid on grounds that the papers had been presented after 1200 noon and that the Returning Officer had only accepted their nomination under duress. The Commonwealth Observer Group strongly objected to this action by Mr Kikira of the EC. The UPCs tampered, rather clumsily, with the nomination papers of the last DP candidate to alter it from 11:58 to 12:05. Apparently, Mr Kikira, the EC Chairman used the Primary Three saliva-on-finger rubber that almost created a hole in the nomination paper. Consequently, two Kasese UPC candidates were elected unopposed. In Kasese North, UPM’s C Kiyonga beat UPC…by 900 votes. On the action of the EC on Kaseese DP nominations, the COG concluded that, “In all the circumstances we have no option but to conclude that the action taken by the electoral commission in declaring the nomination null and void was contrary to the law and had no basis in fact”

8/9 Tororo: The UPM candidates were disqualified from nomination on grounds that they did not know how to speak English. One of the victims of that requirement was Chango Macho W’obanda, who was at the time, (and for many years before and after) a Senior Lecturer at the Makerere University Centre for Continuing Education. Father Okoth was blocked on similar grouds: zero english, when in fact he had even been in the post-Amin cabinet holding the portfolio of Deputy minster of internal affairs, and was even a member of the National Conusltative Council.

9/9 Lango: All but one DP candidate made it to the registration station. Other candidates were chased away by UPC youth wingers/UNLA. The only one that made it was Adoko Nekyon, courtesy to his Oyima clan membership. Even with him, all his 12 supporters were sent running for their lives, so he had no proposer or seconder.

When some people mention the case of Mr Mugwisa, you remind me of UPC impudity. Mubende North East was one of the constituencies where elctions went on to be rigged weeks after voting. At the end of the voting exercise, Dr Sebuliba (DP) was declared the winner. Two weeks later, his seat was allocated to Mr Mugwisa, who was thereafter appointed Agriculture Minister.

For Iganga North East, Luwuliza’s to be constituency, Mr P Wangola (DP) fled to Kenya on 11th Dec 1980 after a squad of UNLAs tried to arrest him. By the time he was forced to flee, he was leading by 28,000 votes, with UPC tagging on with 11,000 in 38 out of 40 polling stations, and even after rigging. The result was eventually announced mid January 1981 on Radio. By the time the announcement was made, Mr Kirunda had 23,144 votes and Mr Wangola had 18,345!

Even in Iganga East, there was similar switching. Mr Nakendo polled 19,859 and Mr Mwonda polled 19,566. Those were switched.

The same story was repeated in Kigezi Central. Mr Kitariko (DP) polled 18,085; while Mr Katama (UPC) polled 17, 827. Those too were switched. At Kashenyi polling station of that constituency, 1,076 ballot papers were received but only 106 were used. Mr Muwanga announced 357, viz, DP: 25; UPC: 330; UPM: 2.

That is when I say: if the opposite of pros is cons, the opposite of progress is Congress!

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

Mutesa’s Death certificate in the UK says that he died of ‘alcohol poisoning’


death certicatemutesa11Mutesa 11′s death certificate in the UK:Follow this link, if you are in the UK, pay £10 by card and you will get Mutesa’s death certificate within 5 days on your doorstep. This is the link:https://eforms.southwark.gov.uk/307.html.

if you have any questions about the names on that certificate, call the Southwark District Registrar’s office and alert them about your concerns. Their telephone contact is: UK 020 7525 7651, their physical address is on this website:http://www.southwark.gov.uk/a_to_z/service/2013/southwark_register_office.

Alternatively, follow the link I give below and pay £10 and the same office will send you your won copy of Kabaka Mutesa’s death certificate within 5 days if you reside in the UK. Link: https://eforms.southwark.gov.uk/307.html. They will sens you somethng like this:

If you happen to visit them in person, they will show the full physical register of deaths recorded in 1969. They will take you to page 763 that will show you Edward Mutesa and the page will look like this image below:

When you zoom in further on the fifth entry on the right side, you will see Edward Mutesa’s full names and initials as they are reflected on the death certificate. NPG x73138; Sir Edward Frederick William David Walugembe Mutebi Luwangula Mutesa II, Kabaka of Buganda by Bassano

Alternatively, go to the website called Ancestry.co.uk on the page for deaths, births, etc at this link: http://search.ancestry.co.uk/search/category.aspx?cat=34. Under search, fill in the Kabaka’s names and enter. You will be given exactly those names and initials. You can pay if you want, to get the full record. If you pay, all you will get is that page 763 of the register, so better not waste you money anyway

In my last years of service in UA I worked in what was called the NAAFI…Navy, Army and Airforce Institute…some kind of Army shop, name copied from the British. We had no Navy! Anyhow, we used to receive some goodies from the UK, remember the Stansted shuttle? These at times included Newspapers and magazines.

In October 1972 we got a bundle that included the Sunday Times Magazine of 22nd. I grabbed it before the CO saw it and I have kept it in my archives ever since. It gave coverage of the highlights of Kabaka Mutesa’s life, under the heading, ‘The King who died in Bermondsey’, written by one Mark Amory.

Below are excerpts from that magazine. I think it might settle some of your doubts and the speculations of many. He was a heavy drinker and as those excerpts show, at PM he was found with 408mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood. That was above the life-threatening threshold of 400.

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

Some UPCs attack my fundamental right and freedom to aspire and/or participate in any elective UPC process ostensibly because of my heritage- Akena


OBOTEUgandans,
I have most often opted not to dignify some of your unintelligible ramblings with comment and I’m sure that is not likely to change any time soon. The direction you seem to be taking is not far removed from what some despairingly naive and senseless people did; coined it as a “unique opportunity” and plunged the whole country into a foreseeable quagmire on the assumption that if you got rid of Obote, some Ministers and some army officers we would all live (except those to be got rid of) happily ever after! Therefore, while you may imagine that by throwing Akena (with Yoga) to those unappeasably baying for the blood of Obote you would have solved some fundamental political differences between UPC and ‘Mengo’, I think otherwise. You have constantly attacked my God given fundamental right and freedom to aspire and/or participate in any elective UPC process ostensibly because of my heritage and mockingly refer to “those who think they are owners of the UPC party”. Unlike you who “supported” and/or were “conscripted”, I, with all due conscience made a conscious decision out of my own conviction and belief, to belong to the UPC and as such will do all within my power and before God to see that MY Party, i.e. UPC, in which I believe, will seek to improve the livelihoods of all citizens of Uganda.

I end with a excerpt from a New Vision interview of 23 May 2009.


Do you regret some of the mistakes committed by your father Dr. Milton Obote like attacking the Lubiri in 1966 and saying a good Muganda is a dead one?

The clash between Mengo and the Central Government was a most regrettable event in the history of our country. I would like to support the position Buganda gave to the Constitutional Review Commission that we should put 1966 behind us, and within UPC we agree and urge that we forge ahead towards a brighter common future with the understanding that we have all learnt from history.

The statement attributed to my father of “a good Muganda…” was not something he ever said nor could he have ever conceived such a diabolical thought. Further to that, how would he have remained married to my mother had he said or held such a view? The statement was a creation of propagandists and has since been used as a weapon to drive a wedge between UPC and Buganda which has been exploited to such an extent by those who sought to gain power at any cost and who seek to retain it while sowing seeds of discord irrespective of the devastating repercussions.

I am among the majority of Ugandans who were not even born in 1966! I would hate to see future generations getting entangled and fixated on these events without the matters being finally laid to rest after a clear open exposition. The UPC has constantly advocated for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission which could help separate the propaganda from the hard facts and this is a position I would be most comfortable with.

What are you people doing to ensure that you mend the UPC relationship with Buganda?

We are seeking to have frank talks with Mengo but as you know approaching the Kabaka must be one with the appropriate formality and takes time. It is important that we engage honestly for the sake of our country. Personally, I find no contradiction to being a son of Buganda and Obote, but then that is my heritage. I would love to see a far better relationship where UPC and Buganda can appreciate their roles and if this means that the Muganda son of Obote must lay his neck on the chopping board before the Kabaka in order for true reconciliation to take place, I would be more than willing if this would guarantee better future for all Ugandans.

Hon. James Akena

RECORD EVIDENCE OF SOLDIERS OR POLICE OFFICERS ABUSING YOU PLEASE


abuseUgandans,

One of the reasons our people are getting this abusive to the population is that we have so far failed to hold them accountable to their actions. It has so far amazed me that in the all past governments in Uganda we have not had a single Ugandan taken to court and charged of human right abuse. We get tyrants and absorb them into society in both inside the country and outside the country. If you look at a country like Rwanda where many have been hunted down it gives those in power a second thinking before they become tyrants like this fat man.

We need to collect as much evidence as possible and send these Police Officers to Hague. Let me also again go after the Uganda population of UK, we have seen a whole lot of these people ending up in UK, target them and sue them. And on this one I hand it to Canada for we have written some very strict laws on books that no single country out there has written them, for we can arrest you in this country and charge you under a Canadian law if we have evidence that you abused Ugandans when you were in power. The Rwandese that have been arrested in this country we even have a specific fund to fly Rwandese from Kigali to the court system here and bite you with evidence. abuse2

So if you are in Uganda and in power and abused the population do not think about showing up in Canada for we will arrest you. In fact we now have a special section in The RCMP {Royal Canadian Mountain Police} which only investigates people with human rights abuse in their own countries. Since we now have the ability of Utube and cameras, record many of these things for they are going to be useful in front of a judge. And after you serve the time The Canadian law set up, we pack you on a flight out back to your country. Uganda Police officers need to get this information. But when photographs like these are posted, I need to know the particulars of these officers, honestly there is someone in Kampala that must know these names and file numbers if possible.

The more we keep quite after such behaviors the more they will be abusive.

Edward Mulindwa.
TORONTO

When M7 is facing and defeating all his enemies, he has to be silly to take his personal security lightly


natasha_museveni‘……….And oh yes: it is silly for some of us to come here every day and rehearse Museveni’s death, and pray openly that his family perishes, and then cringe when he takes the same family out of the country for treatment, like taking Natasha to give birth in German. If people are wishing me dead, everyday at UAH, I would not put my life into their hands, or the hands of their cousins and uncles and that is just a Corporal telling you!

If you superintend a political process where all such groups as those below, pour themselves on you right from day one and you shake them off, know that you are in a very strange world indeed!fool

1. Uganda National Liberation Army (UNLA)
2. Uganda People’s Democratic Army (UPDM/A)
3. Uganda People’s Army (UPA)
4. Ruwenzururu Kingdom Freedom Movement
5. Uganda Freedom Movement (UFM)
6. Uganda Mujahdeen Movement (UMM)
7. Ninth October Movement/Army (NOM/A)
8. Allied Democratic Front/Force (ADF)
9. Force Obote Back Army (FOBA),
10. Federal Democratic Movement (Fedemo)
11. West Nile Bank Front (WNBF) I &II
12. Uganda National Democratic Alliance/Kirimuttu (UNDA)
13. National Army for the Liberation of Uganda (NALU)
14. Uganda National Rescue Front (UNRF) I &II
15. Holy Spirit Movement/Holy Spirit Mobile Forces (HSM) I
16. Holy Spirit Movement/Holy Spirit Mobile Forces (HSM) II
17. Citizen Army for Multiparty Politics (CAMP),
18. Action Restore Justice (ARJ)
19. Former Uganda National Army (FUNA),
20. Anti-Referendum Army (ARA),
21. Peoples’ Redundant Army (PRA)
22. Uganda Salvation Force/Army (USF/A)
23. Lord’s Army
24. Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA)

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

BY MAY 1966, BUGANDA KINGDOM WAS PENNILESS; DEPOSED MUTESA DESTINED FOR PENURY


Sarah Kisosonkole Kabeja, the mother of Ssabassajja Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II.Just as she looks in this picture - very kind, beautiful and lovely!!! R.I.P

Sarah Kisosonkole Kabeja, the mother of Ssabassajja Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II.Just as she looks in this picture – very kind, beautiful and lovely!!! R.I.P

1/8 To fully appreciate Kabaka Mutesa’s financial predcament in exile from 1966, we have to look back at the fiscal sources of the 1966 fiasco that led to that exile. Let me try to give the facts as I was made to understand them in my P4 civics classes. Initial troubles centred on the financial position of Buganda, leading to protracted wrangles between Entebbe and Mmengo over the interpretation of Article 1 of schedule 9 of the 1962 constitution (See pp. 173-4 1962 Constitution at compatriotto, http://www.scribd.com/doc/20262240/Uganda-Constitution-1962). The Central government sought to deduct from its grants to Mmengo additional revenue accruing to Buganda from graduated tax on non-Africans, rents received from public land, leases to urban authorities etc.

2/8 Earlier on, the Relationship Commission (Munster Commission) had laid out the means through which the central government would maintain firm financial discipline over local authorities but curiously, Mmengo did not think that those stipulations applied to Buganda insisting that its relationship with the centre was special and different from that of other local authorities. This (mistaken) view was largely informed by the leverage Buganda had over the UPC government, having eased it into power through the UPC-KY alliance. In spite of that, though, AM Obote is remembered to have insisted that, “we refuse to sign a blank cheque to the Buganda Government”.

3/8 For all its feeling of being special, Buganda was however not assisted by the never-ending financial misdemeanours by the Michael Kintu ministry (Kintu was the Katiikiro until he was deposed in 1964 after Buganda lost in the referendum over the “lost counties”). While Buganda had £1 million in its coffers by the end of 1958, this had dwindled to a mere £465,000 in 1960. In 1963, it was in the red by £226,863.

4/8 In 1965, the Planning Commission of the Buganda Government warned that the Kabaka’s government was on the brink of bankruptcy and that the ministers whose nepotism had reached new limits were the worst offenders. The report also sent out danger signs on the state of morale of the Buganda civil service which it warned, had reached a very low ebb. Another report of a committee led by a Makerere academic, DP Ghai warned that the feeble control by the central government on public expenditure in the kingdom had resulted in a perilous financial situation at Mmengo.

5/8 In 1965, Buganda finances were already in a considerable overdraft but even then, Mmengo went ahead to craft a budget that right from conception, suffered a deficit of £430,000, all this on top of a sum of £200,000 loaned internally to key officials at Mmengo for personal use.

6/8 Through all this, the services that had been transferred to the Buganda government as a federal authority were being heavily subsidised by the central government. Even in the face of that reality and evidence of financial indiscipline, Mmengo wanted the payer of the piper not to have anything to do with calling the tune: the Kabaka Government insisted that in spite of Central government subsidies, Mmengo was entitled to spend according to its own policies and legislation. Entebbe on the other had insisted that it was not obliged to subsidise schemes over which it had no control, particularly in light of reports of serious financial impropriety on the part of the Kabaka Government.

7/8 All this tussling was happening against the backdrop of the pending resolution of the thorny question of the “lost counties” (Buyaga and Bugangaizi) of Bunyoro; which the 1961 Constitutional Conference, attended by Buganda, was supposed to be resolved by a referendum to be held by the central government on a convenient date not earlier than two years after independence, i.e., after 8th October 1964.

8/8 Thus the stage was set for a serious political stalemate between Entebbe and Mmengo……the rest is….as much of history as it is hysteria.


Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

M7 WOULD NEVER BLOCK AN IVORIAN OTUNNU’S THIRST FOR UN BIG JOB


Where is UPC's Otunu? He has been a disappointment to the opposition ever since he came back from exile.

Where is UPC’s Otunu? He has been a disappointment to the opposition ever since he came back from exile.

Is it really possible that YK Museveni could block Mr Olara Otunnu’s attempts at taking the UNSG job? Mr Otunnu had denounced Ugandan Citizenship when he became Ivorian…..and became Ivorian after failing to get Namibian citizenship…..remember? I do not think that the Ugandan authorities could have been consulted at all on Mr Otunnu’s intentions. It must have been the Ivorians that ditched him, and for good reasons. Remember that he was on the shortlist of 5 possible candidates. When it came to the actual voting, his name had been dropped.

Here is an extract of the daily UN news for Tuesday, February 7, 2006….confirming Otunnu’s citizenship as a UN official….

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SPOKESMAN’S NOON BRIEFING
BY STEPHANE DUJARRIC
SPOKESMAN FOR THE SECRETARY-GENERAL
UN HEADQUARTERS, NEW YORK
Tuesday, February 7, 2006

ANNAN APPOINTS ENVOY FOR CHILDREN AND ARMED CONFLICT
The Secretary-General has appointed Radhika Coomaraswamy of Sri Lanka as his Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict.

Coomaraswamy, a lawyer by training and currently Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission, is an internationally known human rights advocate who was Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women from 1994 to 2003.

Coomaraswamy succeeds Olara Otunnu of Cote d’Ivoire, who left that position in the latter half of last year.

details at: http://www.un.org/sg/spokesperson/highlights/?HighD=2/7/2006&d_month=2&d_year=2006

And by the way, Olara Otunnu attended the Moshi Conference of 1979 as a representative of Andrew Kayiira’s UFM. When is it that he onverted to UPC?

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

MUSEVENI’S RESCUE FROM KIREKA ROADBLOCK: WEEKLY TOPIC, 17TH OCTOBER 1980


rescueThe Vice Chairman of the Military Commission Mr. Yoweri Museveni, who is also interim Chairman of the Uganda Patriotic Movement, was rescued from a road-block at Kireka near Kampala on Saturday after being held there for nearly four hours. The rescue was effected by Museveni’s own security personnel who acted after receiving information that he was being held there on the orders of some ‘Mukubwa’ at Nile Mansions.

Information reaching Weekly Topic Investigation Desk indicates that as Museveni was driving towards Ki­reka at about 6.30 p.m. he was overtaken by a car driven by an army officer who is understood to have issued orders at the Kireka Road block that Museveni should be detained there until further orders were received from Nile Mansions.

On arriving at the road block Museveni introduced himself and was told by the soldiers at the road block that they had instructions from ‘Our Mukubwa’ to de­tain him there until further instructions. The Vice Chair­man of the Military Commi­ssion – the ruling body in the country – patiently remained at the road block, together with his wife and five-year-old son for four hours. Meanwhile his two escorts had been disarmed.

At one stage there was disagreement between the soldiers manning the road block; some saying that there was no legitimate reason to hold Museveni there and others maintaining that they were under strict order to do so.
Somehow, nobody knows exactly how, soldiers respo­nsible for Museveni’s personal security learnt that he was being detained at Kireka and mobilised a contingent that rushed to the scene. Accord­ing to eyewitnesses, the Vice Chairman’s security perso­nnel arrived at Kireka in an atmosphere of grave tension and only a timely interve­ntion by Museveni prevented what could have been a bloody incident. He was immediately rushed home.

Whatever explanation for the incident one might care to offer, the political significance of the Kireka affair has not escaped the critical analysis of political observers. This is particularly so be­cause it came in the immediate aftermath of a week of concerted personal attacks and tau­nts against Museveni and the UPM by the UPC leadership.

It is, for example, a matter for easy recollection that a few days before, UPC’s Obote had challenged Museveni’s position as Vice Chairman of the Military Commission in a speech that was broadcast live by the National Radio. And the UPC organ, The People, published an article under a crude headline screaming:’Museveni is bogus’.

Political observers believe that the UPC are spoiling for an immediate showdown with the UPM, and that the week of taunts and snubs directed against the UPM boss was intended to provoke Museveni and the UPM leadership into ‘making a first move’, as one observer put it. According to this theory, the UPC leadership is stalking for an opportunity to ‘solve’what they commonly refer to as ‘the Museveni problem’, once (and) for all.

In another recent incident, gunmen attacked and fired at the car of Dr. Ruhakana Rugunda, Deputy Minister of Health, at his home. Dr. Rugunda is a key member of the UPM National Executive Committee who is known to be a close confidant of Muse­veni.

It has also been learnt that the UPM Secretary for Mpigi District, Herman Mugoye, was abducted from his house at Kajansi by armed men in Uniform. Efforts by UPM officials traced him to a room in Nile Mansions where, it is understood, he was being urged to ‘co-operate’.

At a press conference in the course of the week, Democratic Party boss Paul Semogerere complained that DP suppo­rters in various parts of the country are being subjected to intimidation and torture. These are the conditions under which the Uganda citizenry are proceeding towards the ‘fair and free’ elections on December 10. 1980.

Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto

Wasn’t Amin Forced to Rule At Gun Point?


OBIT IDI AMINAs a military convoy was approaching Major General Idi Amin’s residence, he received information about the impending arrest and jumped over the back fence to escape.

While the military searched his house, Amin first took refuge at the neighbors and from there, proceeded to Kenya.

Obote was president of Uganda at the time and had implicated the Army General in a defense scandal where Amin was accused of having misappropriated public funds.

But for the military man, these were trumped up charges and the real purpose of the arrest was to eliminate him.

There were rumors of a so-called “Lango Master Plan” where the army and government officers of the Luo tribe (Acholis and Langis) were said to be preparing a genocide-like purge of the government of Uganda so that they would take full control of the country.

Obote called Amin back and reassured him. Soon after, Amin was promoted to be the most senior officer in the army.

This promotion brought a new uproar from senior Luo officers in the army and government. One of their arguments was that Lt. Colonel Oyite Ojok who was Army Quarter Master General at the time, was more educated than Amin and therefore deserved the promotion.

Oyite Ojok was also one of their own, a Luo.

President Obote now faced serious decent from his own tribesmen and had to appease them lest they turned their weapons against him.

By 1971, rumors about the impending Master Plan were rife again. Top on the list for elimination was Major General Idi Amin Dada, the head of the army.

He had to be eliminated for the plan to succeed.

Those seeking for his neck claimed to Obote that Amin had planned the assassination attempt on the President in Lugogo in 1969.

They also told the President that the death of Brigadier Okoya and his wife in Gulu was planned and implemented by Amin. They however failed to link the military man to the double murder when matters.

Indeed it was discovered that Idi Amin had actually been at his hometown of Arua at the time of the Brigadiers death.

With all the accusing fingers trying to blame Amin, and with President Milton Obote under pressure from his fellow Luo tribesmen, the Master Plan quickly gathered momentum in a series of secret meetings.

Tensions started rising within the army, including even with the families of officers in the barracks’.

During the line up for rations, wives and children of the Luo officers would openly threaten those of the other tribes, pushing them out of the line and warning them about the impending purge whereby the Luo’s would rule Uganda.

In the Master Plan, the soldiers from the West Nile region of Uganda had to be eliminated since they were in big numbers in the army. And Amin, a known combatant and fighter, was from West Nile.

In a last meeting before travelling to the Common wealth meeting of Singapore, Obote is said to have agreed to the implementation of the Master Plan to take place while he was on the official trip abroad from the 14th to the 24th of January.

23rd January 1971 was code named “Bloody Sunday” for what was going to happen on that day, and Obote would be away at the time and therefore not be seen to have a hand in it.

Amin and many Uganda Army officers and soldiers were now in mortal danger.

Lt Col Okwang, a Luo and Commanding Officer of Lubiri military barracks was tasked to handle the implementation of the operation in his barracks. One Captain Keneri a sniper specialist was tasked to clear Amin upon his arrival back from Egypt were he (Amin) had gone for treatment.

With events in motion, Obote left for the Commonwealth meeting.

Amin got to know of the assassination attempt and avoided it. He then called a press conference on the 16th of January 1971 to announce the attempt on his life by elements close to Obote.

This brought more sympathy to Amin within the army and the country at large as he was already the most popular military officer in Uganda. Soldiers had always revered him for his hands on approach and his ability to easily mix and associate with the common man.

In the streets, people were genuinely concerned about what was happening in the leadership of the country and also what was happening against Idi Amin.

Suddenly on the 23rd of January, (the date for Bloody Sunday of the Master Plan) new developments started unfolding in the Lubiri barracks, the main military facility in the capital Kampala and former official residence of King Muteesa II, deposed first president of Uganda and King of Buganda.

Senior Luo officers in the facility started disarming all soldiers hailing from the other parts of Uganda and ordered them to take the day off.

Luo soldiers were brought in to replace them particularly on guard duty.

Sgt Major Musa Yaoga who was from West Nile, was duty officer in charge of the security of Lubiri Barracks. He was summarily detained to avoid any mishap of the plan.

At the time, many soldiers were just glad to be released from duty so as to enjoy their free time in the nearby Kisenyi bars.

At around 16:00, an announcement was made to the effect that Johny’s mess, where all the lowly ranked soldiers usually had their meals from, was to be the venue of an important officers meeting. All soldiers were ordered to stay away from the venue and instead gather unarmed at the Officers mess where they would be confined.

The meeting took place in the evening after 7pm and involved only Luo military officers.

When the meeting was over, the confined soldiers saw these officers and their kinsmen lining up at the armory to pick weapons and ammunition.

When other soldiers who had avoided being locked in the officers mess tried to join the line for their duty weapons, they were told off and also sent for confinement.

Suspicions now peaked within the military facility. People’s worst fears about the Master Plan were becoming reality right in front of their eyes. And they, in Lubiri, were about to become the first victims.

One soldier, Private Lubari from West Nile, escaped from the barracks and headed for nearby Kisenyi suburb where his comrades who had been relieved of guard duty were enjoying the evening.

He alerted them of what was happening in the barracks and mentioned that the Luo soldiers were now picking weapons from the armory and also disarming and locking up everyone else.

This group from Kisenyi got up and dashed back to the barracks to see what was happening.

Upon arrival, the quarter guard at the entrance of the barracks had been blocked and no one was allowed to enter the barracks.

The group returning from Kisenyi then suddenly received oncoming fire from the armed soldiers and had to retreat. But they only went around the barracks’ and climbed over the perimeter wall under the cover of darkness.

They then proceeded quietly to the area where all the Armored Personnel Carriers at the facility were parked.

One Private Musa Gala jumped in one of the APC vehicles. There were no keys to start the vehicle as all keys were usually kept together with all weapons at the armory.

He found a six inch nail and a key-like opener of tinned beef, fidgeted with that for a while to start the vehicle.

Suddenly, the APC roared into life.

His other comrades gathered around the vehicle for cover as Gala drove the vehicle through the compound.
Destination? The Armory.

Upon reaching there, the Private rammed the vehicle through the armory door shattering the buildings front wall with it.

His comrades dashed into the premises and helped themselves with weapons and ammunition.

Others grabbed the keys of the remaining military vehicles and very soon, several Armoured Personnel Carriers with heavy machine gun fire supported by foot soldiers armed to the teeth, were attacking the Luo soldiers in every corner of the barracks and liberating colleagues.

It is at this point that Amin is contacted from the communication system of one of the APC’s and told of what was happening at the barracks.

He orders the soldier to report to his official residence known as the Command Post for a debriefing.

After being told of unfolding events, Amin orders the Corporal to place the APC strategically in the middle of the road leading to the premises so as to prevent any would be attackers from gaining access to the residence.

Meanwhile, Sgt Major Musa Yoga, who had been released by his comrades from the Lubiri lock-ups, was now commanding the fight inside the barracks.

Some of the Luos fled for their lives, others got arrested and some were killed or injured in the firefight.

After clearing the facility, Yoga proceeded to deploy military vehicles with support troops into the city.

Two APC’s were sent to Parliament. Another two deployed to Amins residence in Kololo, a few at Radio Uganda, some at the Main Post Office and others patrolling the city.

More military vehicles were then sent to the towns of Jinja, Masaka, Mubende and Mbarara.

Amin, as Army Chief, quickly contacted all the commanders around the country ensuring that all military facilities were calm and that there would be no further fire fights.

On the 24th of January, everything seemed relatively quiet and a decision had to be taken as to what to do next.

Obote was to return soon, and for the Lubiri soldiers, that meant getting back to square one where their lives would once again be in danger.

It is at this point that one Sgt Major, requested Amin to lead the country. A request that Amin immediately rejected.

The soldiers also immediately turned their guns on Amin saying they would rather kill him and themselves if Amin didn’t take over as President.

Faced with the inevitable, (they were now all in the same boat anyway), all other imaginable options seemed worse for Amin and the officers from Lubiri.

Amin agreed to be president.

The Sgt Major then went on air on radio Uganda on the 25th of January to announce the military take-over led by Major General Idi Amin Dada.

The so called Master Plan had failed upon implementation and many Luo officers and soldiers were to suffer the backlash of their planned genocide after the take-over.

It is only later in the 90′s that elders from West Nile and those from Luo tribes were able to sit together, forgive each other and put that cycle of violence and retribution to rest.

But while many in Uganda and around the world today believe that Amin instigated a Military Coup against Apollo Milton Obote, what actually happened was an act of self defense by a bunch of soldiers from Lubiri barracks who had been enjoying a day off in the nearby Kisenyi suburb.

The Coup of 1971 was an incredibly ethnic development, and it didn’t belong to Amin. The coup belonged to Private Musa Gala, Sgt Major Aswa, Sgt Major Musa Yoaga. Corporal Lubari, Abdalatif, and around 200 other soldiers of all tribes and religions of Uganda who had feared for their lives and had to fight and take-over in order to survive Bloody Sunday.

by Hussein Juruga Lumumba Amin

STATEMENT BY SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT May 2, 2013


Honourable members, you have heard about the much publicized letter from the Secretary General of the National Resistance Movement (NRM) Party informing the Speaker that the Central Executive Committee (CEC) of the NRM Party had received a report and recommendations­ of its internal Disciplinary Committee and that four members of the party who are also members of Parliament, namely

1.Hon. Theodore Ssekikubo, member of parliament for Lwemiyaga Country;
2.Hon. Wilfred Niwagaba, member of Parliament for Ndorwa East Constituency;
3.Hon. Mohammed Nsereko, member of Parliament for Kampala Central Constituency;
and
4.Hon. Banarbas Tinkasimire, member of Parliament for Buywaga West Constituency .had been expelled from NRM.

The letter also requested the Speaker to invoke her powers to direct the Clerk to Parliament to declare the seats of the said members of Parliament vacant so as to enable the Electoral Commission to organize bye-elections in their respective constituencies.

Honourable members, you will appreciate that since we embraced the multiparty systems of Government this will be the first time that a political organization or party has expelled its members who are at the same time elected Members of Parliament and formally requested the Speaker to direct the Clerk to declare their seats vacant.

Article 83 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda provides as follows

83. Tenure of office of members of Parliament.
(1) A member of Parliament shall vacate his or her seat in Parliament

(a) if he or she resigns his or her office in writing signed by him or her and addressed to the Speaker;

(b) if such circumstances arise that if that person were not a member of Parliament would cause that person to be disqualified for election as a member of Parliament under article 80 of this Constitution;

(c) subject to the provisions of this Constitution, upon dissolution of Parliament;

(d) if that person is absent from fifteen sittings of Parliament without permission in writing of the Speaker during any period when Parliament is continuously meeting and is unable to offer satisfactory explanation to the relevant parliamentary committee for his or her absence;

(e) if that person is found guilty by the appropriate tribunal of violation of the Leadership Code of Conduct and the punishment imposed is or includes the vacation of the office of a member of Parliament;

NRM RESPONSE TO THE RULING OF THE RT. HON SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT TO RETAIN IN PARLIMANT THE FOUR (4) MPS WHO CEASED TO BE MEMBERS OF NRM


Following the Rt. Hon. Speaker’s Ruling made on 2nd May 2013, in response to the NRM Secretary General’s notification to her of the party’s decision taken on the four Members of Parliament as a result of their conduct, namely, Hon. Tinkasimire Barnabas, Hon Theodore Ssekikubo, Hon. Mohammed Nsereko and Hon Wilfred Niwagaba, Members of Parliament for Buyaga West, Lwemiyaga County, Ndorwa West and Kampala Central respectively; asking her to notify the Clerk to Parliament, that their positions had fallen vacant, and her subsequent refusal to honor the request, the NRM responds to her ruling as follows;

The NRM takes exception to the Rt. Hon. Speaker’s ruling to retain in Parliament the four MPs who ceased to be its members, and on whose ticket they were elected to Parliament.

1) The Rt. Hon Speaker’s decision was selective, convenient and ignored to read and apply the provisions of the Constitution holistically and fell short of taking cognizance of Article 1 (2) which empowers the people of Uganda to choose how they shall be governed.

2) The people of Uganda, during the 2005 Referendum adopted the Multi Party system of governance as the political framework under which Parliament operates.

3) Art. 78 of the Constitution supported by the Parliamentary Elections Act, the Administration of Parliament’s Act and the Rules of Procedure of Parliament of Uganda, provide for the sitting arrangement in Parliament based on parties, independents and special interest groups. So the decision of the speaker to retain in Parliament the four MPs, creates another group in Parliament that is legally strange.

4) In taking her decision, the Rt. Hon. Speaker should have taken consideration of the entire constitutional provisions so as to give Article 83 (1) (g) of the Constitution its rightful meaning. Having failed to do so, she limited the operation and development of parties in the Multi Party system dispensation, which the people of Uganda adopted in 2005.

5) The affected MPs having ceased to be Members of NRM, ipso facto, and as such ceased to be Members of Parliament. This is so because, there are four sides of representation in Parliament; namely, Government (NRM), the opposition, independents and for UPDF.

6) By purporting to create special accommodation for the (4) four Members of Parliament, in front of the Speaker’s desk, she effectively recognizes the fact that they ceased to belong and represent NRM in Parliament which defeats her earlier interpretation of Article 83 (1)(g) of the Constitution.

7) We contend that, it was an error of judgment for the Speaker to have purported to create another category of representation in Parliament outside those provided for in the law and this will be vigorously challenged.

8) It is also worth noting that the Speaker is the 2nd National Vice Chairperson of the NRM, member of Central Executive Committee (CEC), and having attended and actively participated in the unanimous decision regarding the status of the four named MPs in the Central Executive Committee (CEC) of NRM, it would have been prudent to disqualify herself from presiding over the same subject matter in Parliament.

9) The Speaker’s decision notwithstanding, the NRM takes the firm position that the membership of the four MPs in its ranks ceased, and their continued stay in Parliament does not only offend the clear provisions of the Constitution but also undermines the will of the People who exercised their power to decide on how to be governed.

10)The ruling of the Speaker is not only an issue of NRM as a political organization but sets a serious and dangerous precedent that undermines the spirit of Pluralism. Consequently, the NRM disagrees with her ruling, and has taken a firm decision to refer the matter to the Courts of law for adjudication.

Hon. Ruhakana Rugunda
Chairman NRM Electoral Commission*********************

HON JOHN SIMBWA, ANTI-CORRUPTION BILL MUST BE INTRODUCED SOON THAN LATER


Museveni vision 2040 has raised many questions

Museveni vision 2040 has raised many questions

By Peter Marco

A few years ago while celebrating UGANDA INDEPENDENCE DAY with some friends I proposed the idea of fighting corruption at all cost and at all level, but some people thought it will be hard and difficult to do.

I proposed the idea of confiscating the wealth of the guilty corrupt people, the freezing of assets they own, selling off property they have acquired, introducing a criminal record status that will be on their record for some time and recovering the money they have taken including paying the court bill to the DPP if they lose the case.

But after sometime someone has taken up my proposal and my dream. Hon Simbwa proposed bill is a great i deal that I had in my heart and it will be one of the main reforms that will help in fighting corruption and building public trust, helping the economy to grow, create new jobs, encourage foreign investors, improve on the social welfare and fight employment among youth.
This idea I copied it in the North East of England where they had a problem of drugs and crime, but when they introduced measures to arrest drug dealers and charge them, it reduced crime,

Measures included the guilty criminals where meant to pay the police money for investigating them, recover the money they had gained from drugs, repossessing of the houses they have bought, take everything of valve in the house and sentencing them to prison for a long time.

This was to discourage the few who thought that drugs and crime pays because the drug dealers who used to show-off with big cars and jewellery they were coming out of prison without anything and with a big and long criminal record that always stays in their life.

The measures gave Cleveland Police, Durham Constabulary and Northumbria Police ways of reducing crime and building the communities.

The reason why Hon Simbwa’s Bill must be introduced soon was started in the North East Of England the Police Services in the area can testify the achievement that such ideas brought.

We need to show the corrupt that abuse of office, embezzlement and stealing from public coffers does not pay.
It will not only benefit in fighting corruption but even to discourage many who are thinking of stealing and embezzling funds.
There is a need to send a strong message to the public that action against corruption is being taken and to the corrupt that corruption will not be tolerated in anyway, by taking away what they have gained and owned through corruption, it will be of National Benefit and for many years to come.

Now if we do care about the country and the future generation we need to build trust in them and make them be proud of their country, by taking action on matters that are of great importance to them and fighting corruption must be Uganda’s Main priority

But i would like to appeal to Hon John Simbwa MP Makindye East to include a clause or title in this bill, which must take away the President’s power to pardon people who have been found guilty on corruption charges.

And to include the title which states that we must have an independent judiciary to Investigate and judge the corruption cases, but that judiciary must be monitored and checked because they can misinterpret the law and go on to use separation of power.

So let’s amend the Anti-corruption Act 2009 and 2012 by supporting Hon Simbwa’s motion regardless of political Party, Tribe, Religion, Culture or Region, but for National interest and for a better Uganda, where people can dream of success with Love, Faith and Hope.

Not a country where dreams are being washed away and people are not proud of their country, we need to build faith back in the public.

Written by Peter Marco

Community Policing is the way forward- says Kale Kayihura


Another Kayihura achievement:New police station building in Bushenyi!

Another Kayihura achievement:New police station building in Bushenyi!

We are working towards setting a modern call center to handle distress calls, and other emergencies. In the meantime, I want to assure you that all the emergency lines, including 999, work and there are free. I will personally confirm this and will get back to you.

We don’t discriminate, and I can assure you we are committed to providing policing services in all parts of the country. However, the problem is resources, human and non-human. For instance, effective strength to be able to show visible policing in the whole country requires 68,000 personnel to police a population of 34 million, ie the international standard of 1 per 500 people. But we only have an establishment of 43,000. And even then, the force must have the necessary mobility and other equipment, not to mention the infrastructure. Nevertheless, we are making progress towards building the capacity of the Police.

I promise in my next communication to give you comparative figures to show you the progress. In the meantime, as they say in Kiswahili, kupanga ni kuchaguwa. We have concentrated a larger force in the Kampala Metropolitan Policing Area (Kampala, Wakiso, Mukono, and parts of Mpigi) because that is where there is the biggest concentration of the population, as well as economic and other activities, consequently, registering the highest incidence (more than half) of the crime, public disorders in the country. And they are followed by the urban centers. But you are right, there are challenges like domestic violence, land related violence and crime in the countryside that need attention.

However, let me also add, that mere visible of police is not enough. It is also the methods of policing. Today, we are embarked on a programme of transforming the Police away from the traditional policing to community policing. Community policing is a crime prevention strategy as different from merely a crime suppression strategy.

One definition of Community Policing: community policing is “a new philosophy of policing based on the concept that police officers and private citizens working together in creative ways can help solve contemporary community problems related to crime, fear of crime, social, and physical disorder, and neighbourhood decay. The philosophy…requires that police departments develop a new relationship with the law – abiding people in the community, allowing them greater voice in settling local priorities, and involving them in efforts to improve the overall quality of life in their neighbourhoods. It shifts focus of police work from handling random calls to solving problems. ( Trojanowicz and Bucqueroux, ‘Community Policing’)

It is preventive through being proactive as opposed to the reactive tendency of traditional policing. Community policing has four elements: transformationing the ideology and organization of the Police to be community oriented; building partnerships with different communities; problem solving: identifying problems that are root causes of crime and violence and together with other stakeholders in the community, find solutions to them.

With this strategy, even with small nos of police in the rural areas, if the Police commanders religiously implemented this strategy, we would be effective. For instance, in some districts, using this strategy, and with LCs and crime preventers (crime stoppers in USA, and the British have similar volunteers) at village level, the policing is effective. In fact, even in urban areas, if this strategy is not employed, the big nos will not be optimally employed to deliver desired results.

The third element is “crime prevention by citizens and police working together”. That is the basis of crime preventers in Uganda, and crime stoppers in the USA, as I noted earlier. We should be able to patrol, and mobilize the community against specific crimes, as well as working together when crime occurs to investigate.

To continue this discourse, i will send you crime reports from 2006 to 2012.

GENERAL KALE KAYIHURA
MEMBER OF UAH AND CURRENT IGP IN UGANDA

What YKM did in Kamuli(Busoga) is what Mr Moi used to do all the time!


M7 and sack with moneyFolks:
What YKM did in Kamuli(Busoga) is what Mr Moi used to do all the time. That is why the likes of Kirongo and yes Deputy President Ruto became very rich. BTW, people used to fight in Moi’s state house. I mean real blows in the corridors, over you guessed it, money. it is also why Kamlesh Pattni milked Kenya billions under the Goldenberg Scandal . People used to wake up and go to hang out in the corridors of state house. The new occupant seems to make state house accessible to journalists, which is a good thing.

So what is it the youth of Kamuli are doing with 250 million? I hope the money does not get stolen because the thieves are also salivating. they want presidentt YKM to give out more cash. One of these days the thieves will pounce, after all they are among the youth and hell will break lose. Being state controller under YKM must the most difficult job.

General Kayihura

I think the IGP has done well under the circumstances. He said it. He needs more boots on the ground but there is no money. Instead the thieves at OPM are swindling billions while the police force is starved off resources. Yet the more boots on the ground the better. But as Mr Nochrach has not tired to remind us, it is upon Ugandans and not us to demand an effective police for them.

We try to ask the IGP questions and offer suggestions but we are not voters in the country. It is upon the voters of Uganda to demand accountable and responsible government. For instance, why no police outside urban boundaries? Why no police vehicles? Why no fuel money for the few if any police cars? Why police officers are poorly paid? Why is the govt not doing enough to construct homes for police etc? These are questions so called MPs and Ugandans must ask.

From what I read and to his great credit, the IGP is accessible. I mean he is everywhere so why are not Ugandans approaching him with real concerns? My advice to the IGP is to hold public consultations/town hall meeting to hear from the peasant. Actually the police in Uganda is overworked and un appreciated. Yes if you appreciate someone or something you treat them with respect and pay them better.

Also the police must also change their attitude towards the people. Why so many different police uniforms? A police officer must not be feared by the people. To complicate matters the “Ogwenos” whom Mr. Okurut talked about negatively are probably no more. Big mistake. The gomboloola askari were the ‘police’ in rural areas.

I sense Ugandans or the govt is waiting for oil money to dream big. Wrong. Dream big now. YKM’s cabinet is a den of thieves. He said it when handing out a bagful of money. Phew! Many are thieves who join politics to steal and not to serve. True dat. There is nothing about public service.

WBK

Kibuli S.S@68:Haji Abasi Kawasi Mukasa is a father to me while Hajji Matovu is a friend


Brig.Kasirye Ggwanga displays his award during the Kibuli SSS anniversary (centre)

Brig.Kasirye Ggwanga displays his award during the Kibuli SSS anniversary (centre)

Dear members of this Forum,

My name is Abdul (Abdullah) Ssewaali. My memories of Kibuli SSS centre around how I ended at this school, my relationship with the HM, Haji Abasi Kawasi Mukasa, and how I performed at the end my A’ Level.

I did not want to go to Kibuli because virtually all the people who mattered most at the school were parents to me: Haji Abasi Kawasi Mukasa; Haji Swaibu Mubiru Mbazira, Mr. Lwamba and many others were literally my parents. I had been used to a discipline without close parental supervision.

Haji Abasi Kawasi Mukasa and Haji Mubiru of Kikunyu, Butambala, then HM at Kabasanda Primary School, as far back as when I was in Primary I at that school, had been driving me to Kampala to go their brothers, my fathers, Haji Badru Kasule and Professor Ishmael Kalule Sabiti. That was far back as 1972. On another level, Haji Mukasa and my mother, Fatiya Nanfuka, a grand daughter of the late County Chief, Kirimi, were literally sister and brother, from Bukundugulu, Gomba. While, Haji Mubiru is the grandson of the late Katambala, Nsambu of Mabanda, Butambala. My parternal grand mather, Nasaza, daugher of Abdullah ssewaali of Kalamba Butambala, was the last standing wife Haji Nsambu. Kibuli was going to be home away from home. I did not want it.

But, at the same time, I felt I had wanted to be with my brothers, the late Isa Mukasa of Haji Abasi Mukasa and Buruhan Mugerwa, HM of Kawempe SSS. The three of us had had a long history as kids.

Mr. Badru Kiggundu, Chairman of the Electoral Commission talks To some of the old girls of Kibulu SSS

Mr. Badru Kiggundu, Chairman of the Electoral Commission talks To some of the old girls of Kibulu SSS

I made sure that I did not make Kibuli any of my A’level choices. I felt that Kibuli was of an inferior status, having been at Busoga College Mwiri! I had passed my O’Level at Busoga College Mwiri, apparently so well as the results could show, but denied a place at Kisubi. I am a nationalist. I will not go into reasons for apparent denial of a place at Kisubi. However, as fate could be, I ended up at Kibuli SSS. Strangely, it turned out to be the best destiny Allah provided to me.

As already indicated that Haji Abasi Kawasi Mukasa is a father to me, some students at Kibuli did realise it, as at one time as a matter of principle I had stood my ground on matters of mutual discipline, they were suprised that he came to visit me at about 02H00 in the morning to enquire of me and the situation at hand.

At the time when Makerere University was the only university with a medical school accommodating at most 100 students, in 1985 I was amongst those who joined the Medical School. That is my Kibuli, That is my Great HM.

Through Kibuli, through a School Sheikh who was in O’Level, I manage to learn to perform Swallah. May Allah reward him in this life and in the hereafter. It was not that at home we were not praying, but the schools I had gone to had incapacitated me!

Through Kibuli, I managed to meet and make friends, amongst them being Haji Dr. Ibrahim “Kinvinvi” Matovu, Current HM at Kibuli. He was my mentor and a friend. That is my Kibuli.

In all this my beloved father, the late Ismail Kalule Bbossa, then working at Kampala City Council was central to my success.

Today, since 13th April 2000, I have a Doctorate in Business Administration, a trained Accountant and a Professional Banker. The foundation was my parents and Kibuli.

May Kibuli stay to be the best.

Dr. Abdullah Ssewaali (DBA)

‘WHO PUT MEHTA IN MABIRA?’- ASKS THE UBC BOSS


Forumists,

I have keenly followed the Mehta-Mabira story for some time and I am not one of those who will blindly support murdering ancient trees just for a little sugar. But I also know of an opposition leader whose ticket to State House was simply riots over the high price of sugar!

Incidentally, many ‘Forest Protection Crusaders’ only protect Mabira on Jinja Road but have destroyed their own smaller Mabiras, which were planted by their ancestors on the lands they have now turned into brick factories. They used their small Mabira forests as firewood to bake bricks…

I was doing a Mabira programme on STAR TV last year when an angry caller stated “let Museveni go away with his muyindi (Mehta) who came with him from the bush in 1986 to steal our land…” From this I belatedly learnt that most of the anti-Mehta fury was about a suspicion that he was NRM and came with Museveni from the bush! Aloooo!!!

In my Uganda today it would be naive to expect the older leaders of such rioters to tell their youthful, misguided brigades the facts because facts work against recruitment.

I stand to be corrected, but I have read that Nanji Khalidas Mehta came to Uganda in 1924. He settled where he is now with the kind permission of the British colonial authorities and the government of His Highness Kabaka Daudi Chwa.

Because Mabira is older than SCOUL, I am sure Mzee Mehta was permitted (encouraged, or even urged) to cut down several acres of trees to plant sugar. Therefore, Mehta and Mabira have been living in symbiosis as neighbours for 89 years. This relationship beats any possible links between Mehta and NRM by only 57 years.

Recently, Mabira got encroachers without permission from Uganda government or even Kabaka. Their impunity is based on the pigment of their skin and the number of votes they can cast. In less than a quarter of the time Mehta has lived beside Mabira, these blessed encroachers have made the forest gods gnash their teeth in impotent rage by murdering thousands of trees.

I have a photo of one Mabira campaign poster reading; ‘ONE TREE CUT, ONE INDIAN DEAD’ and the proud bearer of this genocidal message was standing next to two beaming Members of Parliament and a priest. When one Indian was murdered even before any tree was felled, these MPs and the man of God disappeared from the scene, (AS USUAL) leaving their misguided missiles to be harvested by the police.

Is our mission to protect Mabira from Mehta because he is Asian? Is it to protect trees from decimation except by our own? Are we protecting Ugandans from sugar to create catchment areas of sugar rioters?

Does anyone doubt what would happen if government ever tried to stop Mr X from baking his bricks with firewood from the ffene or even muvule trees in his kibanja, which were left there by his great-grandpa?

Let us protect Mabira from the Mehtas of this planet even as we protect our own few trees from OURSELVES. Only then will Environmental Protection thrive.

TONY OWANA
UBC BOSS AND UAH MEMBER

ARRESTED IMAMS: LETTER TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE


Dr.Kiiza Besigye showing solidarity with the Muslim community

Dr.Kiiza Besigye showing solidarity with the Muslim community

This is to request your office to carefully study circumstances under which some imams have been arrested, prosecuted or investigated on grounds of training/recruiting children in terrorist related activities.

As imam of Parliament of Uganda, I wish to draw your attention to the following Islamic principles and practices.

1) it is within Islamic norms and practices to teach our children S early as 3years the best Islamic practices.

2) Quranic memorization and recitation is taught at a very tender age (3-15years). This is usually done at mosques, homes of imams/sheikhs and. Islamic Madarasas or school

3) During school holidays, many Muslim parental including myself who take their children yo secular schools were Islamic knowledge is not e.g. Mosques, imams/sheikhs residences and some schools turn into Madarasa holiday centers to enable them study the Islamic principles and norms

4) Freedom of worship is clearly enshrined in our constitution and nowhere in our laws parents are barred from teaching their children principles. and practices of their religion at tender ages and there are no gazzeted places for this system.

As you carry out your mandate of keeping law and order, I implore you not to tarnish the image of Islam and the Muslims in general by attributing them to tarnish the image of Islam and Muslims in general by attributing them to terrorist related activities. MemoriZation of Quran and teaching Islamic doctrines has never and will never be a basis for terrorism recruitment since it has been the practice form centuries. I find it difficult to believe That someone interested in recruiting terrorists would target 3-13 years children as the most suitable candidates for the exercise!

Your statement may even lead to many Muslims parents abandon sending their children to Islamic children centers under the fear f b3ing misunderstood at rhetoric expense of their cherished Islamic norms and practices.

We must all fight terrorism in all its forms but we shouldn’t at any one time encroach on people’s freedom of worship which is guaranteed by our laws.

It’s against that Background that I request you to corred4 this impression since many imams/sheikhs will abandon this noble cause of inculcating Islamic norms in our young children for fear of being victimised as recruiting terrorists. You should also engage our religious leaders on this issue so that we can all move in th3 same direction otherwise you may be misunderstood as infringing on our freedom of worship

I SAY THIS FOR FOR GOD AND MY COUNTRY

Yours sincerely

Ssebaggala A. Latif sengendo (MP) / imam

C.c H.E the president

C.c VIP

C.c Speaker

C.c deputy speaker

C.c prime minister

C.c 3rd deputy minister

C.c vice chairman NRM

C.c Price kassim Nakibinge Kakungulu

C.c SUPREME MUFTI OF UGANDA

C.c minister of defence

C.c minister of internal affairs

C.c leader of opposition

C.c director DAAWA/heads of imam

C.c Chairman defense & internal affairs

C.c all Muslim MPS

Lt. Gen.Kayihura Denies Stitching up Top Regime Officials: Nyakayirima, ‘Tinyefunza’ and Mbabazi


LOVE
His Excellency Yoweri Kaguta Museveni
The President of Uganda,
P.O.Box 25497
State House,
KAMPALA.
January, 20th,2013

Yours Excellency. I am Catherine Ddembe, the FDC councilor of Mpigi district and a close friend of Ssebina Ssekitoleko your NRM mobiliser for several years. Around September 2012, I was requested by -y friend Sebina to meet the Inspector General of Police, Lt. General Kale Kayihura to discuss some urgent matters. I agreed to meet General Kayihura in his office at Police Headquarters on Parliamentary Avenue, he asked me to do a mission for him and in return, I would be paid whatever I wanted.

He offered to give me a title for a house in Kampala and a scholarship abroad for further studies. He wanted me to visit my friend Michael Kabaziguruka, the Vice Chairman FDC Electoral Commission at Luzira Prison, where he was remanded on treason charges to convince him as well as Frederick Namara who was once your soldier in PGB and others that were facing similar charges to confess to having been rebels.

Dr. Kizza Besigye he said is a problem with his attempts to overthrow government. He wanted me to convince Kabaziguruka to give a written confession saying this. I got worried when he also asked me to say that the Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, the Chief of Defense Forces General Nyakairima, General David Tinyefuza, and others were the funders and leaders of this rebel group. As a supporter of FDC, you know that I do not support the People’s Redemption Army. If Kabaziguruka and the others agreed to cooperate, they would get their freedom and 200 million shillings each.

I was scared, but I still went to visit the prisoners. ln fact, I visited them many times but my conscience was not clear. I even went to Nakawa court when they were taken there. Ssebina drove me all the times and I felt I could not say no. My friend’s reaction to my offer was of suspicion. They claimed that they had been framed regarding rebel activities, and were not willing to confess in case they ended up in jail forever. Then they told me some other FDC member had also approached them telling them that they were to be poisoned in prison. They told me to go talk to their lawyer Rwakafuzi. When I reported back to the IGP, he said he would talk to Rwakafuzi himself. I did not tell Kale of the poison threats on the prisoners.

A few days later, Kale called me and informed me that Rwakafuzi had refused the offer and said that his clients were innocent in the first place. Then Kale told me to continue engaging my friends at Luzira to convince them that they would find them another lawyer. He even offered to pay their legal fees and upon their release they would be paid 400 million shillings each. I went to talk with Kabaziguruka and Namara again but they refused saying they would die. Kabaziguruka refused saying that in his life he had never met with Mbabazi, Sejusa and Aronda and he can’t help NRM sort out its internal fights.

As for Besigye, Kabaziguruka said that he will die first before implicating his President. When I reported back to Kale, he became angry and insisted that I must finish my mission since he had already arranged a meeting for me with you during your visit to his father’s memorial service in Kisoro last October. After that I went back and met Kabaziguruka and Namara while they were appearing at Nakawa High Court but again they refused.

On Independence Day, Kale called me and informed me that he would skip the Independence celebrations at Kololo and that I should meet him in Muyenga Community Police Post. I wondered why the IGP would miss the Golden Jubilee celebrations and want to meet me. When I arrived, Kale accused me of not doing enough to convince my friends at Luzira to cooperate and yet this operation was blessed by you. He talked a lot about how this operation began Your Excellency, I beg to meet you and tell you more when it is us two.

He told me that the arrest of Kabaziguruka and friends was a set up. This is also what Kabaziguruka had been telling me when I visited him. But Kale said it was your Special Forces that planted those guns. Afande Brig. Muhoozi Kainerugaba had assigned his most trusted soldier, Captain Kashakamba to carry out the operation. I did not believe him and told him that I was scared and wanted to get out of these things.

I feared also now that I would be killed. Kale gave me 20 million shillings to continue with Kabaziguruka group until they agreed to the deal. 20 million was supposed to take care of their families and their welfare at Luzira. Kale told me that he had deployed police escorts to guard the Kabazigurukas on the way to and from Nakawa High Court and that this was a way of putting pressure on them to show them that they had no alternative but had to accept his offer.

While we were seated together, Kale received a phone call from someone he kept on calling as MK. He told him that he had received reports that the Besigye/Mbabazi, Aronda,Tinyefuza group was planning to ambush the prisons vehicle that was transporting the Kabaziguruka’s to court and kill the suspects in order to stop them from talking’ In addition to this, he reported to the same MK that the group had some rebel troops already in Kampala and were planning to attack Mbuya Miltary Barack Naguru Police Barracks and other isolated police stations in central Region. And then Kale told MK that he had requested for 127 billion shillings to sort this out and they were delaying’ He also said on phone that the request was sent to Finance under “supplies” and they were delaying. He told the person on the other side of the phone that they would put pressure on Finance through you since the rebels were becoming stronger.

When he got off the phone, Kale told me that since the Kisoro meeting with you did not happen’ he wanted me to meet you at another time. He told me to tell you that my friends in Luzira had confessed in me that the leaders of their rebel group were NRM leaders in the army and in the party and that also Besigye had carried the other army generals to meet to the Kabaka at his palace in Banda where Kabaka had given his blessing. He also told Muganda me that since the inmates refused to confess, my story would be enough. I am a Your Excellency. I cannot speak about the Kabaka like that.

Your Excellence I decided then that i was going to go in hiding. This man was using your name and I did not feel safe. To know Kale is doing a bad thing, he said he would travel with Ingrid Turinawe our chairperson of FDC women’s League to Norway. From Norway he wanted to buy a confession from a man called Frank Atukunda who is a political refugee in Norway. But when I asked Ssebina why Norway, he told me, Kale was going to Rome for an International police conference. Ssebina told me that I should not talk’ nobody knew he was going to Norway and everyone thinks he will be in Rome. Kale would fly to Thailand to meet you and hand over the confessions he gets in Norway himself.

After this, I got scared and decided to go hide in the village for some time. My conscience was not clear so I asked my relatives and some party members what to do. I was advised to run away from Ssebina and Kale because they are dangerous and powerful. Can you imagine Your Excellence, that Ssebina is so powerful that even Kayihura took him to address the police council? Also Ssebina moves with 5 guns in his car.

Your Excellency, I have written to you because I fear for my life. These people are using your name’ I am also seeking audience to tell you more. The recent problems in Kampala must be the work of IGP Kayihura and Ssebina and their people to justify the existence of the rebel group’ I say this because I have heard Ssebina boasting that these killings are being done by a unit in police headed by a man called Nixon.”

Bayera Gacumba

————————————————————————————————————-
This work of fiction by very evil and malicious persons. I have never met, talked to Dembe Catherine, let alone what is being alleged here. The alleged meetings, and conversations simply did not happen. Preliminary investigations clear show that the letter itself is fictitious. I did not realize how evil, diabolical some human beings can be! No wonder, they crucified Jesus, and this weekend have no shame celebrating his resurrection.

GENERAL KALE KAYIHURA
UAH MEMBER AND POLICE BOSS IN KAMPALA

secession talk is another question demanding answers.


muhooziUganda: secession talk is another question demanding answers.
By Elamu denis ejulu

Politicians have always been the ones known to echo sentiments on secession, of late this year the Acholi members of parliament, reignited the debate on the issue, which has been treated overtime with entrenched suspicion within the ruling NRM and various sections of the country.

This writer would like to add his voice, to this intricate question that has been around as old as this country (Uganda). A section of politicians has chosen to treat this subject (secession) in ethnic lenses from Buganda’s demand for federalism and now the much touted Nile republic (stretching from northern Uganda to South Sudan).

According to Wikipedia, the term “secession” refers to separatism which includes autonomism and self determination/greater autonomy. A clear example has been the agitation by the Scottish nationalist party (SNP) which on winning a majority in the Scottish parliament in 2011, intends to hold a referendum on independence —- in the autumn of 2014.

This would mean that the 1706 treaty of union agreed upon between England and Scotland would come to an end. Meaning the later would seek self determination which is enshrined in the U.N.charter resolution 1514(XV).

The Scottish may seem to have advanced beyond issues like chronic poverty, bad governance but they too like any other society have genuine grievances, which are popular within themselves. Uganda can borrow a cue from such, since we belong to the common wealth of nations.

This does not make us act exceptional, fore stance under the federal agreement that created Uganda, on independence in 1962 between the 14 communities, could be revisited in case of dissatisfaction with the marriage that created Uganda.
Therefore the talk on separation or autonomism, should not be treated with acrimony but accepted as part of the several opportunities, that could heal certain historical problems in our country. The NRM must choose either dialogue as enshrined in article 29, of the constitution or simply repressiveness, postponing the trouble.

It has been propagated by some individuals, that if some regions are granted autonomy or semi-autonomy the country will descend into anarchy. This has been argued in a defeatist manner that seeks to silence even the slightest deliberations on a possibility of regional autonomy (federal system).

In my opinion, this would be the best model for this country. We have been at war within ourselves for over the last 50 years. From the 1962-66 till today we have endured a centralized system of government that has absorbed all resources for the ruling elites, while suffocating the county governments.

This has been coupled with endemic corruption, nepotism and incompetence at the top affecting service delivery at the lower levels of the polity. For us to cure the problems created by the powerful presidency and mal administration.
We need a paradigm shift as a country and this would be federation of the country. Those who argue for secession may not do it out of hate, greed or chauvinism but they try to give the centre chance to reform and ensure equity, effective service delivery and rule of law but much of their effort is instead misconstrued by the suspicious rulers to be anti-nationalists and myopic.
A case in point since 1986 the northern part of this country has been at war (either victims of a war they didn’t start or the perceived marginalization). Its only of recent after the cessation of hostilities between government and the LRA that normalcy started to return, but with all this, came the problem of land grabbing, nodding disease and even the little affirmative programmes geared towards alleviating social deprivation like the peace, recovery and development programme funds (PRDP) were embezzled by corrupt officials in the office of the prime minister.

Such scenarios are what motivate people, to wonder whether they should continue to be under a corrupt, unjust and intolerant NRM government? Instead they opt to determine their destiny but out of frustration amid several opportunities for reforms not forth-coming.

The Museveni administration should not abdicate its constitutional duty of ensuring that equitable development, justice and service delivery is for all. Efforts at silencing secession talk will be treating symptoms, while running away from ameliorating the injustice and maladministration.

Our elites should learn to speak from informed views, one wonders as if this country is the only one where secession is being discussed? Right next to our door step in Kenya, a nationalist group based in Mombasa is demanding separation, citing issues like unfair distribution of land.

This takes us to learn a few from embattled Mali once a vibrant democracy 5 years ago, the MNLA (Tuareg nationalist group) on citing alleged inequality waged a rebellion against the several successive governments in Bamako based on failure to address historical aspirations of the Tuareg people .

The result has been instability in that Sahel country as of late.
No one can claim that all is well in the country; due to perceived injustice it’s a danger for the political elites to celebrate oil discoveries around Albertine grabben and Amuru. in those regions the locals may feel it’s an opportunity to demand for secession, with intent to put more pressure on the centre for reforms and equity. Since they believe the corrupt who have before stolen money for malaria, tuberclusis will not spare the oil resource.

The President is Right on Bail for Corrupt and Murder Suspect:- let them not have bail


Written By Peter Marco
Sometime back while celebrating the 27 anniversary of NRA/M since they took power and liberated Uganda, the President explained the need to fight corruption and economy sabotage as one of the problems facing Uganda today and keeping the country behind.
He stated the need to fight corruption because is scaring away the investors and making the economy not to grow because the taxes, revenue, money for infrastructure, business development scheme, money borrowing schemes, hospitals, poverty fighting initiatives and small business schemes are suffering due to corruption and misuse of office.

The above problems are caused due to corruption and misuse of funds that are meant to help, but because the corrupt thinks that they can get away with it and they can manipulate the system they continue to sabotage everything.His Excellence expresses the failure of the courts in not helping and doing its working in tracking the problem and helping in fighting corruption.He explained the need to amend the law and introduce a bill that will stop Corrupt and Murder suspects from being granted bail.

If we care about the suffering of many Ugandans that is brought about due to corruption it’s high time we support the President on this issue. Why? Someone will ask.The reason is that when we grant bail to the suspect which is their right you can say, some of the suspects misuse it in the way that they temper with the evidence which makes the burden of proof and proof beyond reasonable doubt before the courts difficult.

Someone has just stolen Billions but he/she can buy his way out of the courts and will try to pay off some officers investigating him, take example one officer was suspended for meeting up with one suspect’s lawyers who is fighting charges of stealing billions in the OPM.

If a suspect is granted bail, the first thing is going to do is to cover the tracks which the CID officers did not see in the beginning, like transferring the money on hidden accounts, family member’s accounts, moving money overseas, setting up fake business that will show where he got the money to build nice houses and buy cars, deleting information on the computer and burning the computer savers and high drives, selling off assets to disguise that he did not take money, buying fake shares and finally paying off court officials so that he can be found not guilty.
When the courts grant bail to people they do not give any restrictions that are strong and tuff enough to stop them from doing anything, they just ask for a few millions from someone who has stolen Billions, securities’ and deposit of the passport.
This is a joke because if the person knows that he/she will be found guilty, can even jump bail because he as the money to buy a new passport, and you will hear the next thing that the suspect is in East London, Stockholm, Boston, South Africa or even Nairobi. Some of the places where you find the biggest number of Ugandan Community, when you read about the law and understand it in Equity the law says that whoever comes to Equity must come with the clean hands, but those people do not have clean hands, so why should the courts treat them with grace.

Even their so called lawyers they are not with clean hands because they know that if their clients gets bail they will go and temper with the evidence or run away, they know how to manipulate the system and access to judges through court clerks and other court officials.

Take an example in England John Terry the court found him not guilty of the offences against Anton Ferdinand but the Football Association charged him on the same offences and was found guilty and he accepted the ban of not playing for some matches.
That means that the courts and judges may interpret the law in someone’s favour which is not in public interest and helping, same as giving bail to people who have committed the above crimes, it’s not in public interest to do that.

Still in England one terror suspect Abu Qatada was on bail but with restrictions on whom he talks too, sees and meet up with, but in Uganda the Corrupt and Murder suspects walk free and talk to anyone to help them cover their crime.
If we cannot detainee the suspect for over 35 days without trial, let’s just denial them bail until the trail starts and they appear in the courts to defend them self’s. Simple

The verse of Corruption will not be solved if we do not take measures that are working; the misinterpretation of laws by judges in Uganda courts is causing more harm than good. They take the literal meaning of the act and change it, they go on using the mischief rule and statutory interpretation where it does not apply and which is in favour of the criminals.If the young Rwanda can fight corruption what about the old Uganda, matters of Corruption should be ‘Judicial Review Matter ‘because it’s in the public interest to see that the law is being interpreted in the proper way in fighting Corruption.

By Peter Marco

Uganda: betrayed by the middle class


BY ELAMU DENIS EJULU

The fact is the Ugandan middle class continues to remain detached from the common man, this has contributed to the predicament the country finds itself in.

With salient lessons learnt from the North Africa uprisings in the previous two years famously dubbed the “Arab spring”. Take it or leave it the role played by largely the middle class from public intellectuals, business and student leaders was pivotal to the success of the revolutions. The same has been attempted in Uganda to only a dismal showing due to passiveness and complacency from largely elites, who feel attached to their assets and interests, be it small or huge.

The fact remains, all democratic efforts at changing the repressive and corrupt order in Kampala, has been sabotaged by an aloof middle class (elites) though a few have remained true to the cause. Majority have had to pay loyalty to the hand that feeds them (political patronage) where they survive on the state for lucrative small contracts in whatever illicit ways earned.
Many arguments have made rounds in the public domain, on whether the middle class could join the popular protests “walk to work” and create the ideological base of the cause. This according to analysts has only been wish saying since a great number exhibit concern for their jobs, the little buck that comes at the end of the hustle, apart from this worsened by the arrogant attitude of having a better education in contrast to the false perception on those who participate in the street protests as semi-literates who lack tangible work to do.

Its believed Egypt and Tunisia owe the success of their uprisings to their sizeable middle class estimated at 79.7 and 89.5 percent respectively in contrast to Uganda’s 18.7 percent (ADB) by 2011.

Any way the debate after all may rage on by what determines the middle class in Africa! Since some critics think its almost not yet there but according to the African development bank, referred this group to one that is well educated, access to internet, small family and one whose annual income ranges from $1,200- $7,400.

This was argued against by Calestrous Juma of the Harvard Kennedy School, as not capable of fitting in the capital markets of the developed world but in African— terms they have disposable income and can afford to consume goods and services from a few western franchise.

Recently a friend of mine had a honest debate with Dr.Munini Mulera on social media challenging him on the failure of the Ugandan elites with some savings to support youth in the democratic struggle. The debate left the later startled at the fact that soon many so called elites will be inconsequential to what the country may face, as the disgruntled feel they have common interests with those pillaging the country’s resource.

For radical results to be felt the educated and well-informed citizens should sacrifice their savings to inspire young revolutionaries willing to fight for the restoration of sanity and rule of law in the land. Failure to cooperate will be an indictment on us and none will claim the moral authority to have rescued this country from the mess its entangled in!
Writing per -say is only part of the solution, but real participation is what will end this criminal rule of Museveni and his corrupt cronies. If only my countrymen realized that it took only one soul at self immolation to change the order in Tunis, then we can be counted upon to deliver our land from the bleeding today.

With many journalists arrested and intimidated for speaking truth to the hegemon, academics and other élites have continued to be —-passive——–while blaming the young generation of not taking visible action to change the wrong direction the country is increasingly taking. The cycle of impunity and lawlessness does not segregate the affluent from the poor, highly educated from the less and neither the propertied from the have-nots. The fact remains fate knows nobody and the statements of Richard Dowden, on the African middle class as put below capture the situation in Uganda best.

Are there two Africas? One in a bubble of western-style wealth inhabited by the rich and powerful and another Africa on the other side of the security fence – barefoot, one torn shirt, no money, no prospect of a job – “suffering and smiling” as Fela Kuti sang, but with big and increasingly angry eyes.

Elamu denis ejulu Is a social critic.

Museveni following in the footsteps of Gnassingbe Eyadema.


The recent talk of a military coup in Uganda has gained currency and talk as the public discusses the matter in hushed voices. The pronouncers of these startling statements did not speak secretive but openly for all to hear.

This is one of the several incidents that may break the back of the proverbial camel, as one of the NRM party’s long kept secret, could be soon witnessed not in mere words of hatchet men but in practice. Museveni’s Uganda is not different from the late dictator Gnassingbe Eyadema’s Togo.

Having both ascended to power through a military take over whether the latter’s were two successful military coups in both January 1963 and 71 respectively. Contrary to the so-called NRM revolution which some analysts prefer to distance from a military junta by 1986 ushered in Yoweri K. Museveni to power in Uganda.

The aim of this piece is out of what could be an ulterior motive that could let, out one of the longest held plans in both the first family and the military. Having acquired power successfully through a military junta on January 1967, Eyadema through his rally of the Togolese people (RPT) created a one party system, in which political opposition was suffocated and never allowed to compete on leveled ground.

In the 1993 polls the opposition boycotted and in 1998 and 2003 elections they denounced the results as fraudulent. Amid all this controversy the international community as usual threw in some criticism at the big man including our African union to no avail.

The worst case was in the lifting of presidential term limits in 2002, giving the late Togolese strong man, unlimited avenues to life presidency yet by 2003 he was to be ineligible due to constitutional term limits by then of five.

Why is this Togolese personality crucial for Ugandans to study! It should be known that after the death of Gnassingbe Eyadema one of Africa’s longest tyrants by February, 2005. Zakary Nandja, the then chief of staff of the armed forces declared his son Faure Gnassingbe as new president and later after certain incidences he vacated the presidency only to return later winning a landslide election in April 2005.

President Museveni’s talk of the military taking over through his hatchet men like Gen Aronda Nyakairima and defense minister Crispus Kiyonga, is suspicious!

In January this year daily monitor, was awash with altercations between the various retired generals including the president himself and other officials who are privy to certain information on the military.

Despite warnings from the maverick general Tinyefuza to his colleagues. The worst kept secret of Museveni is now bound to be debated and analyzed on whether Uganda is moving in the line presidential monarchs like Togo and the late Elhadj Omar Bongo’s Gabon.

In both countries the sons of the former presidents took over the reins of the presidency through the same situations created to enhance such a ignominious project.

Since the 1986 takeover by the NRM guerillas- cum- politicians, Uganda has had four highly charged multi-party elections which in all complains of rigging, fraud and intimidation were reported to no avail from the 1996, to the 2001 and 2006 elections believed to be one of the most violent since the NRM took power.

Now the rapid meteoric rise of the first son Muhoozi Kainerugaba in the UPDF chain of command, suggests that the big man could do what others have done before on the continent, since it calls for no feeling of contrition.

The situation suggests it all, with the son commanding a sizeable number of the elite forces (reserve forces) which opposition leader Kizza Besigye and many others look at as a private army within the UPDF.

Such an army could create the last bastion of defense to the Museveni’s bidding to have his son imposed on Ugandans like Saddam Hussein’s revolutionary guards.

Never has this country debated or even thought of a transfer of the presidency from father to son but here we are typical Ugandan fashion of today, simply ignoring the worst that could befall our country and the future of the generations to come.

Not even the NRM politicians can stop such scheme since its not even know
n to most of them but this is what Max Weber best described as “neo-patrimonialism”.

After the lifting of presidential term limits (article 105 of the constitution) Museveni seems to continue until natural forces do him apart but while all this is thought, he seems to be determined to transfer power to one of his family relations.

What could aid such an evil! is when the educated and wealthy Ugandans remain mum and submissive to the regime’s patronage. Just like any unexpected happening it will leave an atmosphere of hopelessness.

The Author,Elamu denis ejulu, is a Ugandan commentator and also journalist in Juba with southern eye/south sudan today news papers

It’s high time we introduce the Birth Control Bill-Peter Marco


By Peter Marco
Birth Control Bill for a future Uganda, great economy and improved social life
Today we can start the work to look at Uganda that will be around 70, 90 or 100 years to come when we are gone, the Nation that our Ancestors left behind and the one that we will leave for the future generation when our time comes to an end.
But I am afraid that we will leave a Nation in which people will fight hard to survive and this is due to over population in Uganda, Uncontrolled Immigration and Uncontrolled child birth.

We are choosing the way we live by having uncontrolled Child Birth every day, which will be dangerous in years to come
When you look at areas in and around Kampala land is scarce while people are too many and they are still giving birth, when you have a chance to visit Bwaise,Katwe, Makerere Kivulu, Katanga, Kiwunya, Kisenyi and others slum areas.

Every 26 people occupy 10mitres of lands and some with a big family of 8,9 children ,they do not deserve to live in such away but due to over population and uncontrolled child birth they find themselves living like that.

Many people have now moved on the wetlands that are not supposed to be settled on by human, areas like Bugolobi, Luzira Nakawa,Wakaliga and the northern bypass road route in the swamp areas which is bad.

I was talking to one Police officer and he told me that the main cause of corruption within the Police force of Uganda is big family and lack of family planning, he gave an example of an officer living in a two bedroom house with 8 children they are looking at the father to provide, food, clothes, school fees and books, while he gets just a few shillings per month which cannot look after a big family of 8, so the end result is to look for other ways to make the family happy and that’s corruption getting money in different channels and making the criminals go away with it

The few hospitals we have cannot handle the increased population every day, schools over 80 students in a class that is not education, roads too many people, cars, bicycle in a small road, Too much pressure on the social life of the population, which is very bad

The government has tried to encourage investors and creating jobs which is good, but every 10 jobs that are created, 560 graduates are applying for the 10 jobs

So we can solve the problem of a poor man in the rural area of Uganda who is going to sell his land to pay school fees for his children by telling him to stop producing children.

The only way will be to legislate and introduce the statute or act of Parliament that will state that any Ugandan over the age of 18 years old and a citizen of Uganda man or women can only have 3 children per family.

We cannot just be playing cheap politics, tribal issues or religious differences on issues that will affect the future Ugandans and our children and grandchildren.

The Africa Development Indicators (ADI) figures shows that Uganda has the highest number of youth in the whole World and its increasing, which is out of control and something needs to be done about it.

I think it’s high time we introduce the Birth Control Bill, in order to choose a life that will be good on the future generation and to stop over population in the country.

By Peter Marco

I met Eriya Kategaya at Forest Mall two weeks before he was hospitalised


by Conrad Nkutu

I met Eriya Kategaya at Forest Mall two weeks before he was hospitalised. We have had a long friendship that was unfortunately diluted at the level of face to face contact by his about-turn when he rejoined Museveni’s Cabinet.

He had been away from work for about 6-8 months after a back problem compressed his lower spinal cord and paralysed him. He was just learning to walk again and was using a cane, which saddened me. I did not know about the blood clot at the time and I wonder now if he himself did.

Typical Eriya, he was in his aging 15-year old personal Volvo. When I asked about the govt 4-wheeler, he smiled and said he had been away from work for a very long time and could not justify using a state vehicle while on sick leave!

I respected his historical contribution to the country but always felt that having to discuss his about-turn would embarass us both, given the strong views he’d earlier given me in private and in public and my continued respect for him.

Reflecting on this though, I would still say he was a very good man and a committed patriot who did things that left the country a better place than he found it. If he was to ask me to judge him, I would say: “No problem Eriya, just like the rest of us, you did not do enough good. But unlike some people in that government, you did no evil. Perhaps we expected more from you than the reality of your relationship with Museveni and the limitations of your personal power and influence could deliver in practice and you retained my respect to the very end…” Rest in Peace.

Statehouse’s – Kirunda Faruk Responds to the IGG’s report


Kirunda at his house. kirunda is a Media Management Officer at state house uganda

Kirunda at his house. kirunda is a Media Management Officer at state house uganda

Members,

I salute the IGG for having seen the value of the investment by allowing the management of MMI Steel Mills LTD to compensate the occupants of plot M155. However, I wish to respond on some of the recommendations in her report:

1. My role in influencing the Jinja district land board

The relationship between the MMI investors and I is nationalistic. My involvement in acquisition of the land was in line with the presidential initiative of attracting foreign investors in the country to expand on the tax base and create employment for the jobless youth. If it wasn’t my involvement Uganda would have lost billions in terms of revenue.

MMI investors have invested USD 30 million in Jinja Steel Factory, which consumes 5 mega watts of power at over Shs 210million per month; they are also boosting the economy of this country by paying VAT of Shs1.2 billion per month. Moreover, they have never received support from government.

kirunda is a Media Management Officer at state house uganda

kirunda is a Media Management Officer at state house uganda

The acquisition of the said land was aimed at expansion of their investments in Uganda and solving a court case following a court injunction on the construction of USD 30 million factory. This followed a case filed against MMI by the second buyer of the land, Dolly Mubarak.

MMI acquired land from Mr. Dolly Mubarak little knowing that he had received a deposit of five million shillings on the same piece of land plot 40, 42-46 Walukuba Road from Mr. Keswala, the first buyer.

The Jinja high court judge, Flavia Senoga , advised both parties to settle the matter out of court. Mr. Subash Patel who was in Tanzania at that time requested me as a friend to spear head the process and in our November meeting at hotel Africana, Kampala we all agreed to settle the matter out of court on condition that the first buyer, Mr. Keswala, be compensated with 5 acres of land so as to lift the court injunction on the construction of the factory. There was no other option but to look for land for the expansion of the factory and compensation Keswala since 4 acres from the 11 purchased from Dolly Mubarak had been lost to NEMA.

Therefore, my alleged influence of allocation of plot M155 was aimed at solving the above problem to save Uganda from losing the MMI investor who has now expanded the tax base of the country. I could not allow the country to lose him. We are all aware that H.E has been keen on promotion and protection of foreign investors. On several occasions he has suggested that whoever stands in the way of investors should be hanged.

2. The alleged use of the Presidents name.

I don’t recall having used H.E’s name as a tool for acquiring the land. I only quoted the meeting of 3rd October 2011 in Dar- es-Salaam, Tanzania where H.E Kikwete introduced Mr. Subash Patel to H.E Museveni as a substantial investor who has contributed greatly to the economy of Tanzania. Among other issues discussed briefly was his Uganda investment plan. In attendance was the then PPS M/s Grace Akello. Records for the meeting can be traced.

However, my communication to the acting RDC Jinja dated 15th January 2012, by then Madam Rwakishumba Judith, was misinterpreted. To the best of my knowledge, it was a brief containing facts about the MM1 investors and not a directive as alleged. The brief was necessary since Mr. Katenda Luutu who had knowledge about the investor was not in office. This followed the failure of Mr. Nyago the deputy PPS to write a letter regarding the same as he had promised in his meeting with the mayor. I couldn’t wait to lose such an investor.

3. The alleged participation in bribery.
It is unfair for a law enforcement officer to punish a person who has been conned and set free a conman with a mere warning. Regarding bribery, if we are to have more foreign investors in the country government should work on mechanism of protecting the investors in this country. There are many investors in this country who have suffered more than MMI, and I can only discuss this matter physically, but what I have to say is that investors are suffering due to political interference with no government protection.

For the case of MMI, I dissuaded then deputy PPS Mr. Nyago from involving politicians but he insisted on involving them because I knew the consequences of involving them based on their track record. When we started facing challenges as a result of their involvement I tried to reach Mr. Nyago on phone and at office but in vain. However, I managed to send him an email on 13th January 2012, on the same matter. I couldn’t do much on the political interference because I am not the one who involved the politicians.

Secondly, on the alleged bribe of Shs15 million, the money paid out was commission to the person who identified the land on condition of refunding the money in case of failure to secure the land. It was receipted. I didn’t pay out that commission neither the subsequent token of appreciation.

4. Acquiring of the land

Jinja district land board is headed by a retired judge Alex Waibale and there is no way I could influence a full experienced judge to make a mistake.

Our main purpose of rushing to secure a title before compensating was to prove ownership of the land basing on the experience of poor management of public land in Jinja whereby land is allocated to more than one person and it was seen as a grave mistake to compensate public land before proving ownership.

Secondly, it is unfair to blame me for the acquisition of land which had occupants yet the council officials who identified that land for the investor were not blamed for misleading us.

The said land was surveyed on instructions of the Commissioner of Lands and Survey in his letter dated 20th may 2005 for Jinja district land board on the request of the then board secretary, Tabitha Kakuze.
Surprisingly, after some time the same Tabitha in her current capacity as the physical planner of Jinja municipal council made some changes on the same land from industrial to residential without notifying the district land board who had the rights over the land basing on their earlier instructions to survey the same land.

The land was dully inspected by the investors with the area land committee which recommended the acquisition of the said land with a condition of compensating the sitting tenants before commencement of the project. The said land had 15 families- not 6, 000 people as it
was alleged in the petition.

A survey was done by Jinja district land board and the lease was offered by the Jinja Land board on condition of compensating the sitting tenants before commencement of the project, and also the required money for the land was paid to Jinja municipal council- not Land board. Documentation is available.

However, when the company reached the stage of compensation confusion arose on who is responsible to handle the compensation among the area leaders.

As a result, the IGG was petitioned over this controversy. It took close to two years for the IGG to issue a report during which time the investment has been on hold.

That petition filed was backed by a clique of some malicious, demanding politicians and technical people who wanted to own oversight over the project for their own benefit. The IGG’s office was used to avenge themselves after failing to make in-roads.

There is always a claim that Jinja has lost its clout as an industrial town. Although numerically that’s false, progressively, it’s true. By 1986, greater Busoga including Njeru had only eight factories. Now they are 70 but could have been many more if it was not for investor frustrations like in the case of MMI.

Investors come here knowing that they will get all the support they need only to encounter hostile individuals who want to squeeze the capital they came to invest out of them. Such people are unpatriotic. Their sabotage is as destructive to the economy as the corrupt and the violent.

Patriotic Ugandans who are doing their best to heed the President’s call of attracting economic-boosters should not be sacrificed at the altar of self-seekers who only milk the economy.

In conclusion I ask you Members of UAH to spare some time and visit MMI. Personally I do not regret my involvement in support of the MMI investors, since it was aimed at expanding the tax base of this country for the growth of our economy which was achieved.

KIRUNDA FARUK
STATE HOUSE

Condolences to the family of Kategeya especially his daughter who is a member of UAH-facebook


It’s sad to learn of the death of Eriya Kategeya. He was on UAH for a year till when he wrote to me last year asking to be unsubscribed. I told him that i wouldn’t unsubscribe him but i would stop messages to his account, as we still needed to hear from him about different issues.

Unfortunately, we never heard from him till when he was reported dead a few hours ago. I’m so disturbed by his death because i believe he has died with a lot of information that would have been useful to a lot of Ugandans. I’m wondering whether he wrote any book before his death……… because that would be so bad if he died without anything for us.

At least, he got a chance to live a bit longer in a Nairobi hospital unlike his colleague, Noble Mayombo, whose family is still finding it difficult to accept his death. I watched a clip on NTV where his brothers: David owini and Phillip something were being interviewed, and they sounded like some members of UAH…. who think that Mayombo might have died suspiciously other than natural causes.

So, Museveni has lost both a dad and close friend during the same period. It looks like old age is catching up with our ‘big’ boys. Condolences to the family of Kategeya especially his daughter who is a member of UAH-facebook. For some reason, I feel sad that Eriya Kategeya is dead!

Now, let us wait for an Edward- Mulindwa- Benghazi bomb!

Abbey
MODERATOR

Muhoozi’s appointments is the consequence of a Constitution that heaps all the appointing authority on the President


Friday 22 Feb 2013

While President Museveni and Dr Besigye’s face off with pen-on-paper instead of teargas and “ajjagenda (“he will go”), is appealing, I was disappointed that “Uganda’s leading politicians” spent so much space discussing the fast tracking of Brigadier Muhoozi. Has Uganda’s instability since 1964 been due to Presidents fast tracking their sons in the army? Weren’t Gen Muntu, Gen Aronda and Colonel Besigye fast tracked by the same Museveni who is fast tracking Muhoozi? Were they the most senior, eligible, competent, deserving and best choice for the positions of Army Commander, Chief of Defence Forces and Minister, respectively? Was it not the President’s arbitrary discretion? Was it ok to fast track them just because they are not his sons? Did NOT fast tracking their sons in the army make Amin and Obote good leaders? Surely the problem of Uganda is more complex than fast tracking of Muhoozi.

ALL top jobs in Uganda are nominated and appointed by the President through assignment of the constitution. These include the Vice President, Prime Minister, Ministers, Chief Justice, Justices, Judges, Ambassadors, Presidential Advisors, heads of the army, police and prisons, Permanent Secretaries, RDC’s, CAOs, Boards and Commissions of Govt Institutions and Statutory Bodies such as the Electoral Commission, Bank Of Uganda, Uganda Revenue Authority, Judicial Service Commission, Health Service Commission, Education Service Commission, Public Service Commission, Human Rights Commission, Law Reform Commission, Local Government Finance Commission, Uganda Wildlife Authority, Uganda Forestry Authority, Uganda Investment Authority, Uganda Coffee Development Authority, Uganda Cotton Authority, National Agricultural Research Organization, National Environmental Management Authority, National Planning Authority, National Water and Sewerage Corporation, Uganda Electricity Regulatory Authority, Auditor General, Inspector General of Government, Attorney General, Solicitor General, DPP, KCCA and now, the Oil Sector Regulatory Authority. Muhoozi is just one addition to this army of beneficiaries of Museveni’s indulgence.

These, and Muhoozi’s appointments are the consequence of a Constitution that heaps all the appointing authority on the President. The overall effect of this constitutional one-man show is that each of these State and Govt officials, who run Uganda with the President, has a personal stake in the Museveni Presidency and actively or passively contributes to its perpetuation, hence the inability to change Presidents, if we want to!

This is the core of Uganda’s problem which needs to be addressed.

If anybody, including Beti Kamya, became President under this constitution, s(he) would generally fill the above positions with people s(he) trusts or those recommended by people s(he) trusts. They, in turn, would be indebted to the appointing authority and the vicious circle of patronage would continue.

Most of the political issues in Uganda are traceable to the Constitution-created-one-man show.

Can the desired autonomy of the executive, judiciary and legislature work when the Executive appoints the judiciary and 20% of parliament, as provided for in the constitution? What is the effect of fusing a supposedly non-partisan State infrastructure with a legally partisan Govt? Is it pragmatic that parliament, of which 20% are appointed by the executive and 60% constantly hoping to be appointed during a cabinet reshuffle, or to be bailed out in time of need, oversee the performance of the executive?

Shouldn’t Uganda’s constitution be reshaped for its rightful role of steering Uganda to democratic order?

I invite President Museveni and Dr Besigye to raise the level of debate above Museveni and his family, (who will be part of Uganda’s past some day), to the infinite future of Uganda, by evaluating Uganda’s Constitution’s ability to provide a conducive environment to promote democratic order, of which separation of powers is a key feature.

Beti Olive Kamya-Turwomwe

President – Uganda Federal Alliance

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,514 other followers

%d bloggers like this: